☛ Signature Bounty & Merit System

[uralcryptocoin]

More than a year ago Merit System was integrated to Bitcointalk forum to make forum messages more informative and quality (or should make it)
That is the question\idea: Why Bounty campaign starters/managers don't use that?
For example it would be an additional bonus for Signature Bounty participants if their message will be merited. It will confirm (in ideal) that the message will be detaily read and estimated and signature will be noticed for sure.

[AzureDragon]

Looks interesting. It potentially can increase both Signature bounty quality and message content quality too

[betty11]

Some bounty managers do carry out similar system. For example, some friends participated in an eth bounty campaign, the aspect of the signature was that: when your post receives signature during the week under review, you will be randomly selected for eth giveaway which is separate from the native token earned. It wasn't limited to signature alone.

[fapar]

More than a year ago Merit System was integrated to Bitcointalk forum to make forum messages more informative and quality (or should make it)
That is the question\idea: Why Bounty campaign starters/managers don't use that?
For example it would be an additional bonus for Signature Bounty participants if their message will be merited. It will confirm (in ideal) that the message will be detaily read and estimated and signature will be noticed for sure.

Previously yahoo62278 used this system to motivate bounty hunters - you have merit therefore get a bonus. But soon there will be a year as he does not use this concept in his bounty campaigns. Here is an example, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3152979

[Lakai01]

I think its a lot of work to track the merit-status of the postings. Bounty hunters usually write hundrets of posts during an ICO, the manager would need an automatic system to analyze and count those posts. But its definitly a very good idea and worth a look at!

[bttmember]

This idea is definitely not workable because very very minor percent of posts get merit so even if they add any bonus for merit point posts there will be hardly any getters.

[dabenko]

In view of that, I was surprised to see that some managers equate Copper Member account with the real Member account. That to me is not encouraging. Which then means that, if a want a reward beyond being a Jr. Member, I should go and by a Copper Membership.

[uralcryptocoin]

I think its a lot of work to track the merit-status of the postings. Bounty hunters usually write hundrets of posts during an ICO, the manager would need an automatic system to analyze and count those posts. But its definitly a very good idea and worth a look at!

Merit data are public and I do not think that it's too hard to collect merit data. It could be realized by simple parsing of registered participant's profile or by using unofficial open API: https://github.com/mprep-btc/Unofficial-Bitcointalk-API/

[OluwaTosin10]

Cooper membership or normal forum accounts are enough I believe
Nothing can be done to convince bounty managers, just make a very applauded posts and get your merits hopefully

[dipeco]

This solution makes sense but nobody will give tokens for a bounty post. It is extremely hard to earn merits, because more and more members are selling it against cryptos. It is too optimistic in my opinion.

[ashmodeus]

More than a year ago Merit System was integrated to Bitcointalk forum to make forum messages more informative and quality (or should make it)
That is the question\idea: Why Bounty campaign starters/managers don't use that?
For example it would be an additional bonus for Signature Bounty participants if their message will be merited. It will confirm (in ideal) that the message will be detaily read and estimated and signature will be noticed for sure.

its a briliant , for basicaly
but , in this cases,
did the manager will want to do some extra jobs like that ?
checking each by each post ,
or u can say , the participant will tell manager about their post got merit
"hello manager , my post got a merit.did i will get extra payment ?"
then manager allocated some payment for people got merit,
then another people try to cheating merit system,then they got banned from a moderator
then they born again as a haters to this forum.
and my opinion, its will be useless in the end.
i just think , merit system created to reduce the birth rate of new member.

[Upgate]

This issue has been discussed before on the forum.
And if I may correct you there are some signature campaign that gives reward to the amount of merit earned during the week

[StatesManG]

This could be discussed on META section I guess. But I really don't think your idea will be implemented because some of the messages from the signature campaign participants are spam

[powerman24]

It is an interesting idea and some bounties are using already motivating merited posts with additional stake. It would increase post quality for sure. Would be nice if other bounties follow this attitude.

[spngebob]

Because for members who are posting in altcoin boards chance to receive merit is very slim. If bounty managers would pick only members who are merited they would not have many participants. Less visibility for projects and that is not really what projects need. They need marketing.

[rachman mahesa]

Because for members who are posting in altcoin boards chance to receive merit is very slim. If bounty managers would pick only members who are merited they would not have many participants. Less visibility for projects and that is not really what projects need. They need marketing.

That's what I like about you. We participate in a Signature Campaign not a quality problem or not. The most important thing that we discuss is according to the topic that exists and certainly must be useful. Projects really need marketing to succeed in selling their tokens. To be much interested by investors. I cannot imagine if the bounty manager must implement merit in every person who wants to participate in the signature. Because certainly certainly very few participated in the campaign.

[fuer44]

the rules signature remains the same, bonuses will only be obtained from avatars and personal text. if you want to make more informative information, you can follow the article bounty, where you are required to make interesting information about the project, and you will certainly get a big bonus.

[BQ]

that would probably promote the buying/selling, or easier, trading of merits I think.
but if it was going to be used, maybe it'd be better not to have it as a bonus, but the whole signature bounty like: make 5 posts that become merited.
although that's a bit outside the scope of a bounty manager maybe, plus very few would join those.

[patz22]

That would be a great idea and actually I see some campaigns managed by some bounty managers who require a number of merits to ensure the quality of each post but I also agree on the statement above that it may cause a lot of problem in buying/selling it. On the other hand, it is still a decision by managers and of course every project needs a lot of promoters.

[Abal Abal]

I think it is quite difficult for managers, because actually the managers work with time. and most of the messengers don't just hold one bountyb project. besides that merit can't be shared that easily, there is a limit that someone can share their merit.