You said all of my sources were broken. None were broken, you are just crying you had to do 1 extra step to look at the source, the name and contents of which were provided.
So you mean the link wasn't broken but I need to go find the study by myself? How illogical is that? If your source wasn't broken I wouldn't have to find it on the CCES site xD
So yes your link has only one source and this source is broken.
Then when I go try to find this miraculous study explaining how much illegals are voting I find only raw data (not a study) so your source is lying with talking about a "Harvard study" (or at least they're not providing any link to such study and this study doesn't exist on the CCES site).
And when you look at the raw data you see that there is no category, no label, nothing refering as "illegals" or "nationality" or anything similar.
SO you give a link to an article claiming a Harvard study proves tons of things about how illegal vote. Their source link is broken. Then I go to the CCES site and try to find such study by myself and find nothing but a raw data tab. Then I open this raw data tab and don't see anything related to something like what your article claims to be...
So now please shut the fuck up.