My thread for Maggie

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Economy - Reputation - Re: An obvious case of trust abuse (DT members welcome)
  

  I definitely like your doublespeakLet's make things simpleYou come up with a couple of posts from my recent post history

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - [ scenarios ] Changing Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  Someone has been complaining about Merit and more recently DefaultTrust for a very long time.His proposed "solution" is usually a

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  Scenario ch666Scenario ch666: 50 users qualify for DT1 by voting:Code:1. hilariousandco (DT1! (29) 442 Merit earned) is included by 9

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Who exactly told theymos to change the threshold to 250 cycled merits?
  

  Since this is the only real attempt on THE ENTIRE THREAD at a debate then I will answer this after

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  Nothing - has been debunkedYou are drawing false conclusions again. Perhaps I can just hire a secretary to post on

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  I have a suspicion that if theymos started actively blacklisting several members, CH would not like those results either...CH will

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  well these are Theymos own words are they not? I thought he said that recently in his guidelines.I mean if

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Economy - Scam Accusations - Re: Possible scam "N Word Pass Coin"
  

  A joke that's neither clever, nor funny.  The joke is rifiuti thinking anybody is going to buy his "racism tokens." 

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed
  

  I can definitely say that this is another bot farm. This is clearly seen by the dates and time of

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Blocking of account - AUTOBAN
  

  Well thank you. This is understandable ..But my first question remained open - why was my main account blocked earlier?

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  But then again no objective person who looks at the fans and recipients of you and your "pals" can believe

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Legendary member gregofdoom ban - moderators please help.
  

  there is no point disusing the obvious, whatever you posted there is not plagiarism by any means,  and i am

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Should forum persuade users of the merits of a customized trust lists?
  

  Yes I am sure this isn't a reaction to trust lists being weaponized to silence anyone who objects to this

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  Wrong doing has been proven many times in the context of a trust systema/ lyingb/ self confessed trust abuse (red

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ scenarios ] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
  

  Okay  snitchy calm down...Whatever, theymos removed the merits from my excellent post that stood on its own merit for being

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: [ PERMABAN APPEAL ] ChiBitCTy
  

  I'm interested to hear suchmoons view on this case actually. Where is she? probably panting away replying to me somewhere

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: The new DT system, updated 02 MAR 2019
  

  True, but the DT1 re-calculation only happens once a month (so far), rather than updating in real time. So if

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been mentioned and quoted in the following messages:

 

• Other - Meta - Re: Why is META not a SIG SPAM FREE ZONE? surely you want real Enthusiasts opinions?
  

  The Pharmacist is not a spammer, and I don't have him on Ignore. Every single post of his that I

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Economy - Reputation - Re: Strange 'merits' assignment
  

  Hello, thanks for the quick answer, I'm complaining because it looks shady or even someone can think about I just

[Maggiordomo]

suchmoon, you have been quoted in the following messages:

 

• Economy - Reputation - Re: Strange 'merits' assignment
  

  Even if many members on the forum do not necessarily care, the small ecosystem of the bounty campaigns is full