[Proposal] Enhance the requirements for ranking up to Member position

[DdmrDdmr]

<...> I forgot to mention that these ranks are based on the merit amount regardless of the current activity, so I just added the notice below the chart.<...>

I looked into that option too, but strangely enough, we still seem to differ for some reason:

Code:

selfMadeRank                  nUsers
self-made Legendary           13
self-made Hero Member         43
self-made Sr. Member          108
self-made Full Member         378
self-made Member              6538
self-made Jr. Member          19665

Considering just merits, not activity. Data as of 22/02/2019. We’re spot-on Sr. Members (108), but differ a lot in Members for example.

[1715495665]

1715495665

[1715495665]

1715495665

[Coin-1]

<...> I forgot to mention that these ranks are based on the merit amount regardless of the current activity, so I just added the notice below the chart.<...>

I looked into that option too, but strangely enough, we still seem to differ for some reason:

Code:

selfMadeRank                  nUsers
self-made Legendary           13
self-made Hero Member         43
self-made Sr. Member          108
self-made Full Member         378
self-made Member              6538
self-made Jr. Member          19665

Considering just merits, not activity. Data as of 22/02/2019. We’re spot-on Sr. Members (108), but differ a lot in Members for example.

I take into consideration the initial amount of merits, that is, the rank on the day the merit system is introduced also matters. If a user was a Member (or higher) on January 24, 2018, he/she couldn't rank up to his/her initial position.

Also, It would be interested in seeing the ratio of Jr members to those who ranked up to Members

N (users who ranked up to Jr Member) / N (users who ranked up to Member) = .....

This is an additional ratio of ranked up users:

• 16130 (users who ranked up to Jr. Member) / 3957 (users who ranked up to Member) = 4.07

[LoyceV]

<...> I forgot to mention that these ranks are based on the merit amount regardless of the current activity, so I just added the notice below the chart.<...>

I looked into that option too, but strangely enough, we still seem to differ for some reason:

Code:

self-made Member              6538

I can reproduce your data: From Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit:

Code:

   543. 99 Merit received by vh (#690806) from 12 unique users in 21 transactions
~
  7080. 10 Merit received by (GrOOm) (#1613421) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions

There are 7080-543+1=6538 users who earned anywhere from 10 to 99 Merit.

I take into consideration the initial amount of merits, that is, the rank on the day the merit system is introduced also matters. If a user was a Member (or higher) on January 24, 2018, he/she couldn't rank up to his/her initial position.

That makes sense
I'm not going to try to reproduce it.

[libert19]

I also feel that merit requirement should be changed.

For example,

5 merit for jr member, 20 for member, 50 for full member, 100 for sr member, and 250 for legendary. 

I am not asking for merit airdrop to everyone again, start from scratch, I don't care. In current system, reaching jr or member status is ok but anything above it the gap is HUGE!

[tranthidung]

Those first two are good to wipe out all shitposters and don't allow them chances to move up to Member rank.

5 merit for jr member, 20 for member

I don't agree.
Those three requirements, if accepted and implemented by theymos, will create a new generation of shitty Full Members, Senior Members, and above.
I have a hypothesis that if those new requirements implemented, we will see a new abusement wave like that happened with Junior Members Demotion last year. 

50 for full member, 100 for sr member, and 250 for legendary.  

I like the gap, that makes a lot of sense for the forum.

anything above it the gap is HUGE!