Bitcoin Forum
June 24, 2024, 06:07:32 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: What's the fuzz all about? are ICO's/STO's any different?  (Read 231 times)
Chika08
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 544
Merit: 1


View Profile
February 28, 2019, 05:59:33 AM
 #21

When ICOs first came to be, the community surrounding it turned a blind eye to security regulations that where currently set in place, thinking they would be able to bypass such laws. After regulations came knocking on the doors of such ICOs a "new" wave of collecting funds started to appear late of 2018 known as STO's, which promises to provide a more secure way of raising funds while minimizing the risk of investors.

Are STO's all they are set out to be?
The answer you will find is no, through all the hype around STO's one has to be reminded that both a STO and ICO are completely the same.
To gain a better understanding you will have to ask yourself the following questions.

1. What are Securities?
In most countries around the world you will come to find that securities are tradable financial assets.

2.What are the regulations for securities?
Each country has different regulations set in place, some have strict regulations set in place from KYC to the restriction of only wealthy investors being able to trade financial assets.
On the other hand there are just some countries who simply do not care to have regulations set in place.

After having obtained the answer of these two questions one can come to the conclusion that both an ICO/STO are to be considered a security dependent on the country in which the project is established in.
Just because a project claims to be a STO does not mean that you can safely invest in it.

So here comes the third question to be asked.

3. Is there protection against fraud in the country in which the project is established in?

Some investors may prefer to invest in projects in which are established in a country with minor security regulations, if so one must be aware of any laws against consumer fraud. Are you as a investor able to hold the project responsible in the case of which they decide to simply run of with your money?
You better make sure there is, an example being St Kitts and Nevis in which there are minor security laws but still enforcement set in place against consumer fraud.

Conclusion
When considering to invest in a STO make sure to inform yourself on current security regulations in the country in which it is established in as not all countries have well established security laws and for those that do most do not allow common folks to invest in such security offerings such as the U.S. On top of being informed of security regulations in such country make sure that there are laws in place that have consumer fraud enforcement set in place to protect your investment in the case of any wrong doing.

STO's and ICO's are the same, do not be fooled just because a project states to be a STO.

Lol!! You should read more about STO and ICOand have a better understanding of them. STOs and ICOs aretwo different things entirely aside the security around the STO that you have talked about,  there are still alot that has to do with STO and can't be compared to any ICO. Make a better research before making such conclusion
Chika08
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 544
Merit: 1


View Profile
February 28, 2019, 06:02:17 AM
 #22

STO's and ICO's are the same, do not be fooled just because a project states to be a STO.
Both are not the same. The STO is the more regulated type of the ICO and the more compressed type to confront the scam.
https://101blockchains.com/sto-vs-ico-the-difference/

they may not be technically the same but they are practically different. and in practice and reality is the only thing that matters.
basically STO is the alteration of ICO because ICO failed and many people (read newbies) thought they failed because they weren't regulated so the "fake" regulations with KYC (which ended up stealing their personal information) were introduced and that eventually turned into new scams called STO.
Both are the same, both are still not yet regulated and whatever people will try to shill for STO and the result will be the same of ico. Is this a joke if they can try to avoid legal problems through change its name into the ICO.

You are very wrong, Polymath is an STO and was regulated. I know many projects which passed regulatory bodies and some that are still inthe process. Because some projects lied about being regulated does not mean many others hasn't pass that regulations
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!