🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 [Rocket.Run] 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

[Rocket.Run]

Notification and Tip function now available!
Tip your fellow Rocketeers!
Make this ROCKET a better place![/center]

I have ideas for Rocket.run's tips.
How about a kind of tips to help boosting the speed of gamers' rocket?
Of course, the site can give them options, and option that allows to use tips in order to boost rocket's speed is one of available options to use tips.
My ideas maybe crazy, but innovative, and might make difference for the Rocket game.

Thank you for the wonderful feedback!!😍😍

[alisafidel58]

Do some promotion or giveaways will be good imo to attract more people to play, like this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124774.0, but with long run like play 100 rounds or more for every week or every months. Make a forum is good but not now imo.

They do have promotion in games and rounds. At the site is relatively new it will have to present more promotion to new players outside this forum.

[edisystem]

Do some promotion or giveaways will be good imo to attract more people to play, like this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124774.0, but with long run like play 100 rounds or more for every week or every months. Make a forum is good but not now imo.

They do have promotion in games and rounds. At the site is relatively new it will have to present more promotion to new players outside this forum.

I know lol, what i'm trying to say is make it for a long run like weekly giveaway or lottery and to win the giveaway you need to play more rounds, not only 10, maybe 50-100 rounds or even more every week to able to participate the giveaway.

[cabalism13]

Warning:

There are so many Entries coming from the Newbies on the ROCKET'S EVENT, I think OP should limit the participants by its Rank. Possibilties of being abused is extremely High!

[thd26bct]

Warning:

There are so many Entries coming from the Newbies on the ROCKET'S EVENT, I think OP should limit the participants by its Rank. Possibilties of being abused is extremely High!

Should have restrictions, such as only Member and above can join this Rocket's event.
It will help Rocket team more easily to prevent cheaters come and join.
Of course, it is not a perfect solution, but much helpful tool for the team to prevent potential abusements because it's hard for abusers to hit Member rank to abuse. 

[asche]

Warning:

There are so many Entries coming from the Newbies on the ROCKET'S EVENT, I think OP should limit the participants by its Rank. Possibilties of being abused is extremely High!

Why would they care. The point is having new registrations and people playing on the site. Which is happening. Newbie or not, doesn't really matter for the sites operation.

[wwzsocki]

Warning:

There are so many Entries coming from the Newbies on the ROCKET'S EVENT, I think OP should limit the participants by its Rank. Possibilties of being abused is extremely High!

I don't see how can one abuse this promotion?

One has to register, play 10 rounds and post username in a special thread.

I think is enough requirements and the main goal is to have more players so every limit in participants is a bad idea.

[cabalism13]

Why would they care. The point is having new registrations and people playing on the site. Which is happening. Newbie or not, doesn't really matter for the sites operation.

A single person can do such thing in no time because of this event. After that there won't be any activities on those registered accounts. Well it does matter, for that is unlikely unfair for those who're using only one account to join the event and especially for those players who're playing fairly.

Just like on the previous gambling sites, participants are way too abusive. If you don't even care about a thing just because you're not part of it even though you're seeing such bad activities then that's on your conscience.

If this site only aims for a much number of registrations anf not a number of legit users then why they bother themselves making some hassle ideas pretty much up until now?

the main goal is to have more players...

Yes, indeed... To Have More Players not To Have More Accounts that is wasted and only created because of a certain event.

[tbct_mt2]

Yes, indeed... To Have More Players not To Have More Accounts that is wasted and only created because of a certain event.

Updated rule:
Participants of the event run by the Rocket.run team have to get 5 merits in minimum over last 120 days to get acceptance to join and get paid.
To get acceptance and get paid, they have to post proofs of their 5 received merits in latest 120 days
 

[Oilacris]

Yes, indeed... To Have More Players not To Have More Accounts that is wasted and only created because of a certain event.

Updated rule:
Participants of the event run by the Rocket.run team have to get 5 merits in minimum over last 120 days to get acceptance to join and get paid.
To get acceptance and get paid, they have to post proofs of their 5 received merits in latest 120 days
 

So they do switch up with current rules of Hhampuz on signature campaign which is pretty good to be applied on these contest.This will really stop any abuse for sure.

[alisafidel58]

Yes, indeed... To Have More Players not To Have More Accounts that is wasted and only created because of a certain event.

Updated rule:
Participants of the event run by the Rocket.run team have to get 5 merits in minimum over last 120 days to get acceptance to join and get paid.
To get acceptance and get paid, they have to post proofs of their 5 received merits in latest 120 days
 

So they do switch up with current rules of Hhampuz on signature campaign which is pretty good to be applied on these contest.This will really stop any abuse for sure.

It's pretty easy to abuse the past mechanics in order to participate in the event. 5 merit requirement is good enough to stop the abuse of newbies creating multiple registrations and participate in the event.

[tbct_mt2]

It's pretty easy to abuse the past mechanics in order to participate in the event. 5 merit requirement is good enough to stop the abuse of newbies creating multiple registrations and participate in the event.

Sure, if they want money, they should do something.
Cheaters come and go, don't bring anything valuable and constructive for both the forum and projects.
Therefore, I think that bounties should have prerequisite requirements to verify participants or applicants.
Teams should not give cheaters so easy rules to get free money, that way in some cases might result in abusements at the end.

[dis93]

Not everybody pams for merit / signature campaigns everyday. Somebody use this forum just for reading and fun for years. As me 

So 5 merit \ 120 days isn't constructive rule.

[alisafidel58]

Not everybody pams for merit / signature campaigns everyday. Somebody use this forum just for reading and fun for years. As me 

So 5 merit \ 120 days isn't constructive rule.

It is a good rule to make. If you were here for years then you should be legendary by now. Anyways, Its to prevent newly created account to spam the event. I'm sure that even if you are here just for fun then probably you have contributed something worthy in this forum if not then it is not the fault of OP if you cant join the event.

[Sellman]

Not everybody pams for merit / signature campaigns everyday. Somebody use this forum just for reading and fun for years. As me 

So 5 merit \ 120 days isn't constructive rule.

The forum did not have issues with users like you, creating account for reading and get funs.
Unfortunately, most of newly created accounts born to spam the forum, and it is why merits have been along our jouney since 2018.
As combination of merit and rank system, I think such rule is good.
And if you simply read and get fun, it is not a problem with you, obviously.

[dis93]

In most cases combination of "no brand new" and "registered X weeks" more than enough.

[Sellman]

In most cases combination of "no brand new" and "registered X weeks" more than enough.

It is good, but not good enough to prevent exploits.
There are thousands of newbies waited for months to get chances to abuse such easy events.
They don't contribute anything to the Rocket.run site and the site's income for sure.
Get free money and get home.

[Yaunfitda]

Not everybody pams for merit / signature campaigns everyday. Somebody use this forum just for reading and fun for years. As me  

So 5 merit \ 120 days isn't constructive rule.

Perhaps you are just one exception, but believed me, there will be a lot of people who will just registered here in a day and would just take advantage of the mechanics of the game.

I would give you one example and I'm sure  Hhampuz can attest to it, I'm not sure if it was late 2018 or early 2019 wherein Hhampuz open a survey thread and he paid those who participated in bitcoin, not that big though, but still in bitcoin.

And then it was exploited with lots of 'brand new' accounts trying to take advantage of it. I'm sure Hhampuz caught a few who try to get away by exploiting. But my main point is that it will be abused. So the merit requirements is a good thing to deter cheaters.

[maximumcoin]

There is rare pure account like this. 

Perhaps you are just one exception, but believed me, there will be a lot of people who will just registered here in a day and would just take advantage of the mechanics of the game.

This is basic charateristic of bounty hunters, especially cheaters.
They always wait for great chances to exploit bounties, events that loosely managed by easy rules.

And then it was exploited with lots of 'brand new' accounts trying to take advantage of it. I'm sure Hhampuz caught a few who try to get away by exploiting. But my main point is that it will be abused. So the merit requirements is a good thing to deter cheaters.

[tbct_mt2]

In most cases combination of "no brand new" and "registered X weeks" more than enough.

How many weeks should be in your opinion?
I think it should be months, six or nine months is appropriate requirements, if the criterion included.
However, I don't support such criterion, because it might be not effective.