How legit it is!

[TalkStar]

Its true that when a higher rank member apply for a lower rank then obviously lower rank members lose their chances to be accepted. But from my view its totally depends on campaign manager decision to take them or not.

[Retina]

But is it not self-contradictory as s/he will mention one type of rank and then will take from another rank?

No, there is no contradiction as both parties, manager and participant, have no problem with it.
After all, a signature designed for a low ranked member will show properly on the profile of a higher ranked member. The opposite is not true.

I think the campaign manager will take from any other rank. But what will s/he will do if legendary rank is blank? Will s/he take from lower rank? If s/he will not take from lower rank, then s/he will take from an upper rank of a lower rank slot?

If no legendary applies for the position then the manager can open more slots on lower ranks postion accirding to his bugget.

Okey, Just I want to know that when one slot open member rank position so that why apply a Legendary for this slot? or already a lot of member rank position member still now so why a manager can approve the legendary member?

Note: I think it is an injustice on lower rank people

[Ipwich]

I also noticed that, and take note signature campaign manager are not called bounty manager, IMO bounty manager are those who pay in altcoins or tokens during the ICO, just to make it more accurate.

I've been in the forum since 2016 and I never see this things happening before, this simply means that there's a shortage of campaign because there are a lot of accounts looking for signature campaign, these would not happen if bounty is still profitable but unfortunately it's not anymore.

So, to answer the question if it's legit or not, I guess there's no problem with that since it's not against the forum rules and the manager can make it's own rules, revise the existing one at any time he wish to do, of course as long as in conformance with the forum rules.

Now, I understand your sentiment that low rank accounts that are already in the campaign and those who are applying might loss their opportunity to be part and to upgrade in pay in case a spot opens up. IMHO, there is a disadvantage for the high rank also since they will receive a lower rate compared to the rate they are supposed to, so it's an even game.

I would to site you an example, just recently    bustadice signature campaign(FULL) had an opening of a member rank but instead of hiring a member,  yahoo62278 did hire a Legendary for a 25$ per week which suppose he will be receiving 100$/week at the current rate, and in    his past campaign he is receiving BTC0.015 per week which is equivalent to $58 and that's even half of what he is receiving now.

[nutildah]

I would to site you an example, just recently    bustadice signature campaign(FULL) had an opening of a member rank but instead of hiring a member,  yahoo62278 did hire a Legendary for a 25$ per week which suppose he will be receiving 100$/week at the current rate, and in    his past campaign he is receiving BTC0.015 per week which is equivalent to $58 and that's even half of what he is receiving now.

I don't quite get what you're saying here: the guy took a >50% pay cut, or his 0.015 BTC campaign expired?

Its true that campaigns are also in a bear market, along with BTC, but its not unreasonable that BTC will triple in price before the year's end, which would make them relatively profitable.

[Ipwich]

~snip~

I don't quite get what you're saying here: the guy took a >50% pay cut, or his 0.015 BTC campaign expired?

~snip~

I was just referring to his previous campaign, and with a Legendary account I guess he can still make around 0.015 BTC weekly ( estimate only) on the existing campaign now which is more than 50% of his current pay rate when converted to the current exchange rate. (BTC/USD)

To make it simple and short, my explanation is simply to tell everyone that it's not unfair if a high rank member will be given a lower spot in a campaign.

[Findingnemo]

I would to site you an example, just recently    bustadice signature campaign(FULL) had an opening of a member rank but instead of hiring a member,  yahoo62278 did hire a Legendary for a 25$ per week which suppose he will be receiving 100$/week at the current rate, and in    his past campaign he is receiving BTC0.015 per week which is equivalent to $58 and that's even half of what he is receiving now.

I don't quite get what you're saying here: the guy took a >50% pay cut, or his 0.015 BTC campaign expired?

Its true that campaigns are also in a bear market, along with BTC, but its not unreasonable that BTC will triple in price before the year's end, which would make them relatively profitable.

The other reason maybe bustadice is one of the longest running campaign so the user participating on it no need to worry about the campaign is ending in near soon,if there is a vacant spot for his rank then he may get swapped until that getting $25 everyweek makes sense.

[Retina]

I would to site you an example, just recently    bustadice signature campaign(FULL) had an opening of a member rank but instead of hiring a member,   yahoo62278 did hire a Legendary for a 25$ per week which suppose he will be receiving 100$/week at the current rate, and in    his past campaign he is receiving BTC0.015 per week which is equivalent to $58 and that's even half of what he is receiving now.

I don't quite get what you're saying here: the guy took a >50% pay cut, or his 0.015 BTC campaign expired?

Its true that campaigns are also in a bear market, along with BTC, but its not unreasonable that BTC will triple in price before the year's end, which would make them relatively profitable.

The other reason maybe bustadice is one of the longest running campaign so the user participating on it no need to worry about the campaign is ending in near soon,if there is a vacant spot for his rank then he may get swapped until that getting $25 everyweek makes sense.

Yep, I'm nothing to say about for this reason because I think that a lot of people Read this topic but no response, It can one day be very bad or bigger, One day lower rank people will do a lot of good work but they will get their status,  I think it should be a solution, As if he could not apply anything other than his own place.