nutildah got red trust recent hours. Is the red trust fairly for him?

[TECSHARE]

As far as I am concerned this account should be considered compromised as there is no way to know for sure it was not transferred. I really wouldn't be surprised if this account is simply a sock used by another more well known member attempting to maintain their desired narrative without risking their main account.

Everyone who disagrees with you is my sockpuppet. Case closed. Now that you don't have to sherlock around looking for dirt you'll have so much more time to implement your "standards". Thank me later.

So what part of this explains why Nutilduuuh gets a pass on trying to sell their account while anyone else who does this gets theirs destroyed?

EDIT: I find it very telling you personalized this even though I said nothing about you.

[suchmoon]

So what part of this explains why Nutilduuuh gets a pass on trying to sell their account while anyone else who does this gets theirs destroyed?

EDIT: I find it very telling you personalized this even though I said nothing about you.

Nobody dares to destroy my sockpuppets, isn't that obvious to you yet?

[TECSHARE]

So what part of this explains why Nutilduuuh gets a pass on trying to sell their account while anyone else who does this gets theirs destroyed?

EDIT: I find it very telling you personalized this even though I said nothing about you.

Nobody dares to destroy my sockpuppets, isn't that obvious to you yet?

Let me know when you can coax a logical on topic argument out of that hollow skull of yours.

[nutildah]

Wow man. You just love a good conspiracy don't you.

Me unofficially staking my BTC/XCP address last April:

Anybody want to buy the "ownership" of my NFL team name tokens? I have every team name except for "Bears," which was already taken, so I created "Bearsb" instead.

A few years back I had an idea to create a gambling system where people could buy team name tokens and then if that team won the Super Bowl, holders of that token would split a pot of BTC of all tokens sold.

In the meanwhile, people could actively trade, buy or sell their tokens according to how well those teams were doing in the regular season.

Unfortunately, it didn't go so well, because ultimately everybody had to trust that I would pay out the pot and not just run off with it.

I don't think I sold a single token.

I should really come up with a more automated way of doing it before next season starts. But if you're interested in buying the complete set, let me know; they're all under the same address:

1PypgzaAJXHzLPvkLQwWzqwn1AyhJd9YUi

One of my first comments in the Counterparty thread:

I shudder to think how much I have spend on btc transaction fees on failed sales of xcp for btc.  Order cancel themselves especially mysteriously or the btc holders are logged out so the do not pay...  Meh.

Yeah, I agree that this is a problem.  Pissing away satoshis on mysteriously failed orders doesn't feel good.  I realize that the amounts involved are small, but multiply by X and they get bigger.

They need to be more like the real exchanges in this area. (No fees for cancelled orders). Would encourage people to make more use of the CP exchange.

Today's message from this address (1PypgzaAJXHzLPvkLQwWzqwn1AyhJd9YUi):

Code:

tecHshare is an NPC. sincerely, nutildah, dated 3-21-19 (because its tomorrow over here)

Signed:

Code:

H8pDlWVOKBd5TAOUhFiqUTZRhfTd9BEbzJYIosZ2do/bQJXWPzQc/1OSXN1kxJn8WznXJt/IFXfxbw6vzhBMstg=

But please, don't take my word for it:

https://blockexplorer.com/messages/verify

[Quickseller]

I found this in Nutildah's trust ratings today and found it rather interesting... usually this would be grounds for completely removing any credibility for an account and red tagging it to the center of the Earth, but as usual, some people around here are more equal than others...


Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0

"Account for sale. Archived page if he deleted the thread.

https://archive.is/BBMFH "

I was trolled extensively years ago when I was in the account selling business, examples are below.

IMO, the above is likely an indication that the trolling was not an expression of his opinion but was an attempt to discredit his competition unethically.

There is also substantial evidence that Lauda is/was engaged in account trading and he also tags sold accounts.

Okay, so, no need to ever pay attention to anything anybody in this thread has ever said or will ever say in the future.

Thanks for the tip, Quickseller.

Bump

I know its a cruel world and people gotta do what they gotta do to get theirs,

but really?

This is what your life has come to?

[TECSHARE]

Wow man. You just love a good conspiracy don't you.

Me unofficially staking my BTC/XCP address last April:

Anybody want to buy the "ownership" of my NFL team name tokens? I have every team name except for "Bears," which was already taken, so I created "Bearsb" instead.

A few years back I had an idea to create a gambling system where people could buy team name tokens and then if that team won the Super Bowl, holders of that token would split a pot of BTC of all tokens sold.

In the meanwhile, people could actively trade, buy or sell their tokens according to how well those teams were doing in the regular season.

Unfortunately, it didn't go so well, because ultimately everybody had to trust that I would pay out the pot and not just run off with it.

I don't think I sold a single token.

I should really come up with a more automated way of doing it before next season starts. But if you're interested in buying the complete set, let me know; they're all under the same address:

1PypgzaAJXHzLPvkLQwWzqwn1AyhJd9YUi

One of my first comments in the Counterparty thread:

I shudder to think how much I have spend on btc transaction fees on failed sales of xcp for btc.  Order cancel themselves especially mysteriously or the btc holders are logged out so the do not pay...  Meh.

Yeah, I agree that this is a problem.  Pissing away satoshis on mysteriously failed orders doesn't feel good.  I realize that the amounts involved are small, but multiply by X and they get bigger.

They need to be more like the real exchanges in this area. (No fees for cancelled orders). Would encourage people to make more use of the CP exchange.

Today's message from this address (1PypgzaAJXHzLPvkLQwWzqwn1AyhJd9YUi):

Code:

tecHshare is an NPC. sincerely, nutildah, dated 3-21-19 (because its tomorrow over here)

Signed:

Code:

H8pDlWVOKBd5TAOUhFiqUTZRhfTd9BEbzJYIosZ2do/bQJXWPzQc/1OSXN1kxJn8WznXJt/IFXfxbw6vzhBMstg=

But please, don't take my word for it:

https://blockexplorer.com/messages/verify

Absolutely meaningless. If you sold the account there is no reason you could not have also sold your wallets to sign with. That address was posted after the attempted account sale anyway, so there is no way to verify you are the original owner.

[nutildah]

I was trolled extensively years ago when I was in the account selling business, examples are below.

IMO, the above is likely an indication that the trolling was not an expression of his opinion but was an attempt to discredit his competition unethically.

"Competition", LOL. If anything its an indicator that I was more of a dick back then, or perhaps even an indicator that nothing has changed, if one were inclined to see it that way.

You can dig up plenty of instances of me being a dick -- no question about that.

[suchmoon]

So what part of this explains why Nutilduuuh gets a pass on trying to sell their account while anyone else who does this gets theirs destroyed?

EDIT: I find it very telling you personalized this even though I said nothing about you.

Nobody dares to destroy my sockpuppets, isn't that obvious to you yet?

Let me know when you can coax a logical on topic argument out of that hollow skull of yours.

Which part of what I said you consider not logical or not on topic? Seems to fit really well with your 100% logical on-topic world-against-TECSHARE conspiracy theory so what's the problem now?

I really wouldn't be surprised if this account is simply a sock used by another more well known member attempting to maintain their desired narrative without risking their main account.

gets a pass on trying to sell their account while anyone else who does this gets theirs destroyed?

[marlboroza]

"bataklik   2019-02-23   0.00000000   Reference   Promoter of scam project that is pretending to be a successful project. Please see here for scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5110191.0 . This user's account has likely been hacked and is untrustworthy. "

Sockpuppet.
Malware.

"BrieMiller   2019-02-22   0.00000000   Reference   Promotion of HYIP products, part of a bumping service that bumps threads with low-value posts. Not genuinely concerned with the outcome of projects. Do not trust this user or take any of their questions seriously. "

Sockpuppet.
Scam.

"cryptobenn   2018-12-02   0.00000000   Reference   Promoting the ETH token scam "FREE Coin" "

Why use FREE coin?

Extremely Fast
Super speed erc20 Chain

LOL!
Looks like some super speed pump and dump erce 20 scam crap.

What is point of this post?

[nutildah]

"cryptobenn   2018-12-02   0.00000000   Reference   Promoting the ETH token scam "FREE Coin" "

Why use FREE coin?

Extremely Fast
Super speed erc20 Chain

LOL!
Looks like some super speed pump and dump erce 20 scam crap.

Here's my favorite part about FREE Coin (besides the fact that they minted 10 TRILLION tokens!):



He's inferring that his token will have an $8.3 trillion market cap by the end of 2024, which is 8x bigger than his prediction for Ethereum itself on that date.

[TECSHARE]

The part of my selectively edited quote which you conveniently left out:

I am not even saying your ratings shouldn't have been left, maybe they should, but that is irrelevant.

The point is Nutilduuh felt those ratings were justified, yet when the same standards are applied to them, suddenly we all need to reconsider. I like this one Nutilduuh left for example.



Can you tell me Nutilduuh, why is it account sellers are not to be trusted? Why is this bad for him but ok for you?

Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0

"Account for sale. Archived page if he deleted the thread.

https://archive.is/BBMFH "

[nutildah]

I think you have this backwards. You know what is interesting is you used to have me on your trust list, but for some "unknown" reason as I became more vocally critical of trust rating abuse you fell in line with all of the worst abusers, not only excluding me, but then becoming their toadie mouthpiece attacking me any time I brought it up.

I just saw this as someone brought it to my attention.

This is incorrect.

I never had you on my trust list, not for one minute. Never. Not even as an accident. You can use LoyceV's lists in an attempt to demonstrate otherwise, but you'll just be wasting your time.

Really man. Your obsession with me is... well... flattering.

[marlboroza]

~snip~

Lets stick to this one for a moment:

"bataklik   2019-02-23   0.00000000   Reference   Promoter of scam project that is pretending to be a successful project. Please see here for scam accusation thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5110191.0 . This user's account has likely been hacked and is untrustworthy. "

Sockpuppet.
Malware.

"BrieMiller   2019-02-22   0.00000000   Reference   Promotion of HYIP products, part of a bumping service that bumps threads with low-value posts. Not genuinely concerned with the outcome of projects. Do not trust this user or take any of their questions seriously. "

Sockpuppet.
Scam.

"cryptobenn   2018-12-02   0.00000000   Reference   Promoting the ETH token scam "FREE Coin" "

Why use FREE coin?

Extremely Fast
Super speed erc20 Chain

LOL!
Looks like some super speed pump and dump erce 20 scam crap.

What is point of this post?

What is wrong with 3 selectively picked trust ratings?

You picked them for a reason.

So what is wrong with them?

Are they financial or not?

[TECSHARE]

I think you have this backwards. You know what is interesting is you used to have me on your trust list, but for some "unknown" reason as I became more vocally critical of trust rating abuse you fell in line with all of the worst abusers, not only excluding me, but then becoming their toadie mouthpiece attacking me any time I brought it up.

I just saw this as someone brought it to my attention.

This is incorrect.

I never had you on my trust list, not for one minute. Never. Not even as an accident. You can use LoyceV's lists in an attempt to demonstrate otherwise, but you'll just be wasting your time.

Really man. Your obsession with me is... well... flattering.

How far do his lists go back? Regardless the point is you engaged in high levels of scrutiny upon me for simply pointing out the abusive dynamic here, but I am "obsessed" for questioning your own behavior and double standards?

[nutildah]

Regardless the point is you engaged in high levels of scrutiny upon me for simply pointing out the abusive dynamic here,

Wrong... its for other reasons, but let's save that for your own reputation thread shall we?

but I am "obsessed" for questioning your own behavior and double standards?

Yes. This is a pretty clear case of obsession if I've ever seen one, as far as this forum is concerned. And the dynamic is abusive, to be sure. I hope you're happy that I took you off ignore to respond to you. But its late and I'm knackered. As always, you can have the last word.

[TECSHARE]

Regardless the point is you engaged in high levels of scrutiny upon me for simply pointing out the abusive dynamic here,

Wrong... its for other reasons, but let's save that for your own reputation thread shall we?

but I am "obsessed" for questioning your own behavior and double standards?

Yes. This is a pretty clear case of obsession if I've ever seen one, as far as this forum is concerned. And the dynamic is abusive, to be sure. I hope you're happy that I took you off ignore to respond to you. But its late and I'm knackered. As always, you can have the last word.

Any chance you will answer my question and explain why account selling should be negative rated for others but not for you? Is not the fact that you tried to sell your account evidence that you have no regard for the user base here and were willing to allow them to be scammed because you wanted money?

[marlboroza]

~

How about stop changing subject and address this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118010.msg50244857#msg50244857 thank you very much.

The part of my selectively edited quote which you conveniently left out:

I am not even saying your ratings shouldn't have been left, maybe they should, but that is irrelevant.

Part of post is left out because you didn't say anything at all.

What does it mean?

I am not even saying
your ratings shouldn't have been left
maybe they should
but that is irrelevant.

Should they have been left or not? This is very simple question.

We have:

1)malware
2)scam
3)super speed erc 20  

Do you think rating should have been left for people who

1)spread malware
2)scam
3)run extremely super speed erc20  

Or not?

Why did you post trust thingies?

How are these 3 examples the same as iCEBREAKER's trust rating?

[TECSHARE]

How about stop changing subject

Interesting concept. Tell me, why is it I should justify Nutilduuhs own ratings? That was kind of the whole point for bringing them up, to ask Nutilduuh to justify them and tell me why they were not the same as iCEBREAKER's rating. I love the turning everything on its head polar opposite game though where some how I am expected to justify the ratings of other people.

All of your answers are in the last few pages of the thread, but of course you don't really have any questions you are just looking for an excuse to keep the topic sliding away from the fact that your buttbuddy sold their account, and the trust police mob consider this grounds for destroying the reputation of the account if it was anyone else. Of course there are standards for the regular plebeians of Bitcoin Talk, and then standards for those with the golden ass kissing lips. You all here dog piling have no problem digging into the lives of others, but when the roles are reversed suddenly you all become victims.

[marlboroza]

All of your answers are in the last few pages of the thread

I want to hear it from you.

Tell me, why is it I should justify Nutilduuhs own ratings?

OK, let me try it this way.

You are the one who brought 3 trust ratings into this thread.

Explain to our community, as one of the oldest members here, this:

What does it mean?

I am not even saying
your ratings shouldn't have been left
maybe they should
but that is irrelevant.

Should they have been left or not? This is very simple question.

We have:

1)malware
2)scam
3)super speed erc 20  

Do you think rating should have been left for people who

1)spread malware
2)scam
3)run extremely super speed erc20   Grin

Or not?

Why did you post trust thingies?

How are these 3 examples the same as iCEBREAKER's trust rating?

You have presented 3 examples of trust ratings for people who:

1) spread malware
2) scam
3) run very very fast erc 20 tokens chain whatever

You must have reason why you have mentioned these trust ratings.

So say your reasons why they should or should not be -ve tagged.

That is how normal conversation works.

You say "I agree or don't agree that you have tagged scammer and person who spread malware because..."

After you are done, we will discuss account trading part. It is very important that you answer this before we discuss other part.

[TECSHARE]

more shameless toadying

Well gee, I guess it is a good thing I have no obligation to respond to your contrived interrogation over other people's ratings. I don't know what I would do if I didn't have your approval to move on marlboroza.

Can you tell me Nutilduuh, why is it account sellers are not to be trusted? Why is this bad for him but ok for you?

Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0

"Account for sale. Archived page if he deleted the thread.

https://archive.is/BBMFH "