After visiting the spread sheet I discover the process of choosing most constructive users.
It is the main purpose of merit competition and bonus payments for winners in signature campaigns.
The competitive level of such merit competition depends on the average constructive levels of participants.
For such high competitive campaign like ChipMixer, for example, even to get acceptance with application to join, you have to beat so many others constructive and merit-earned productive candidates.
Therefore, the average level of accepted participants are high, certainly, and they can fight each other to win the merit competition of ChipMixer.
Anyway, for any average level, there are always outstanding. For the case of ChipMixer, they are LoyceV, DdmrDdmr,
For lower average level campaigns, it operates the same. There are always outstandings, even in lower average levels.
Let's take a look at less competitive campaign, Bustadice.
elda34b, and Findingnemo have won most of the rounds.
Sheet has been turned in to owner, congrats to elda34b, Ridwan fauzi, Findingnemo, and Baofeng for this weeks bonuses
Sheet has been turned in to the owner, congrats to bl4nkcode, bbc.reporter, elda34b, and coolcryptovator for this weeks bonuses.
Sheet has been turned in to owner, congrats to bl4nkcode, Baofeng, coolcryptovator, and elda34b for this weeks bonuses
Sheet has been turned in to the owner, congrats to bbc.reporter, elda34b, ralle14, and Findingnemo for this weeks bonuses
In general, I don't really think that such merit competition in ChipMixer has actually boosted the quality of participants' posts.
Why I said like this?
Because those participants are intrinsic constructive users, they write constructive posts as their basic instinct.
Merits come or not, it depends on luck, the odds of catching attention of readers, and available free sMerits of readers at each specific time point.