Bounty Hard Cap

[Ucy]

Most ICOs do not deserve their hardcap. I think the undeserving ones are just being greedy. Many of them are  decentralized applications with very simple concepts that do not deserve even their softcap

[bartusv]

It depends on the project but many of them set unrealistic hard cap targets they cannot achieve in these market conditions.
It does not look good when a project changes the targets and reduce them like x10 when they realize they are not achievable.

[pilosopotasyo]

Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?

You should name that ICO when you are posting information about that ICO, you should be aware that these ICO are faking their sales to entice people to invest and make it appear they are getting funded and trust from investors.

[CaMeRoNy]

It is NOT necessary to invest in ICO because the use of them now is still there. It is better to buy tokens of interesting projects for you on the exchanges.

[jojohamasa]

When the information is incomplete, there are many questions and doubts
As for the value of the hard hat, there are two possibilities
Either the team is confident of the product
Or it's a stupid scam
It was better to publish ICO websit so that we could know it clearly.

[Sarastiche]

Several ICO this days are from scammers and unrealistic developer, Hardcap and soft cap should have a basis, and not what we see this days without a basis for figure quoted, for bounty hardcap most are always noted on the bounty thread, thous some developers tends to behave dubious after the ICO.

[Jamalzzz]

Try the project again and you have to name the project.
So that it will be easier for everyone to help you do a review.
Indeed, Hard Cap with that size is very difficult to achieve in a collapsed crypto condition.
Don't easily believe promising sites, it's better to do research.

[jhonjhon]

Several ICO this days are from scammers and unrealistic developer, Hardcap and soft cap should have a basis, and not what we see this days without a basis for figure quoted, for bounty hardcap most are always noted on the bounty thread, thous some developers tends to behave dubious after the ICO.

Softcap will be some basis that a certain ICO will continue or even survive. It's commonly thing today that some ICO's where not achieving their target just because of the market situations and failure to show their capabilities into the public. That's is why many project have turn out into nothing cause they'll never get the amount that could help to sustain and continue to develop their project.

[Cashi]

Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?

Yes it is normal, many projects do it to raise more money. Important is Softcap, that's the funding money needed to start operations and if softcap is not met the project won't start because collected funds are not enough. Total supply should be displayed on website, you're right.

[apityeh71]

$72 million is too big money for ICO and this goal of hard cap look too greedy.  And in this bearish  trend is very hard to collect that amount from investor. The normal hard cap for ICO is around $10 to $25 million.  The more important thing for project is they should be have working product.

[shinratensei_]

$72 million is too big money for ICO and this goal of hard cap look too greedy.  And in this bearish  trend is very hard to collect that amount from investor. The normal hard cap for ICO is around $10 to $25 million.  The more important thing for project is they should be have working product.

Not only greedy but when you tried to create a comparison between that ico with another ico that needs a small amount to create a product and it doesn't make sense at all. That's why we called that as money grabber.

[libert19]

Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?

72M! Projects that need this massive amounts start better be ignored by investors, because most probably it's a scam.

[Robotbitcoin22]

Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?

at this time I already believe in funding that can reach the target at ico because we see that investors alone are not of great interest in the presence of ico which is very risky

[daarul50]

The ICO project seems to have to be considered again because such events are usually a feature of an ICO project fraud. I hope you have not invested in the ICO.

[r32godzilla]

Why the subject is bounty hard cap (which probably doesn´t exist) and you are writing here about ICO hard cap.

And my answer to your question is simple, leave if you think that the hard cap is too high. They can´t easily raise hundreds of millions of dollars before they show something

[Lanatsa]

Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?

Dont bother and skip it out and move to another project bounties because most likely with this hardcap they would still end up on failure which means
high tendency for bounties not to be paid out in the end of the day.Imagine that even projects do ask out $1M on their hardcap do still have the hard
time to attain it, how much more on $72M. Wake up man.

[Gabali126]

Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?

A hard cap of 72 million dollars is too high for a project to target especially in this current state of the crypto market. It may never be realized.

[Fuhre]

72 million is very much. what about the softcap? if the softcap can be achieved, maybe there is still hope that the project can continue. with a hardcap of that size it must take a long time because very few ICOs can fulfill the hardcap, but, with the right team and promotion, they have the possibility to reach that target. When participating in ICO, hardcap is an important factor to determine the value of coins in the future. Demand and supply are also important to determine the price of a coin, if the supply of coins is unknown then I think it's dangerous

[Nekoma2018]

Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?

You're dealing with a non transparent project they'll probably end up as a exit scam.. becareful on the kind of project you promote

[basty03]

Is it normal that an ICO has a Hard Cap of 72 million dollar? And as of now I cant find the total supply of the coin so that I can compute the total supply and the value per coin, and I guess they should also put the total supply in their site. What do you think?

Its rare to every project to reach a hard cap because even they reach it there's no assurance that it will boom in the market or having a great price. Some of are fake so they can attract some investor to invest in them. So always check it first before we invest to avoid loses.