[ANN][FSC]FusionCoin updated! Arbitrary message & Decentralized advertisement

[niothor]

https://www.atomic-trade.com/

That one should be added to the op.

[poolers]

Is this net hashrate right? All of the pools combined for scrypt are less than 100 MH/s, there is barely any forum activity, barely any trading activity, but net hashrate shows 60 GH/s? It doesnt seem right.

[zneww]

I am also kinda confused :/

[Blackblanco]

Is this net hashrate right? All of the pools combined for scrypt are less than 100 MH/s, there is barely any forum activity, barely any trading activity, but net hashrate shows 60 GH/s? It doesnt seem right.

I finally stopped mining after 6 hours with no blocks found...  I checked official SHA pool and there are almost 3 Terrahash.  Since i am renting time from betarigs, I had to stop.  SHA miners getting all coins?  I'm a beginner miner so not sure...

[fusioncoin]

Is this net hashrate right? All of the pools combined for scrypt are less than 100 MH/s, there is barely any forum activity, barely any trading activity, but net hashrate shows 60 GH/s? It doesnt seem right.

There is a bug which displays incorrect network scrypt hashrate.
We already fixed it, please update.

[fusioncoin]

Is this net hashrate right? All of the pools combined for scrypt are less than 100 MH/s, there is barely any forum activity, barely any trading activity, but net hashrate shows 60 GH/s? It doesnt seem right.

I finally stopped mining after 6 hours with no blocks found...  I checked official SHA pool and there are almost 3 Terrahash.  Since i am renting time from betarigs, I had to stop.  SHA miners getting all coins?  I'm a beginner miner so not sure...

Sorry for the confusions. We already fixed that.
You can check the hash rate showing on our explorer(http://fusioncoin.org/fsc.php).
It's 7.6GH/s for now, which has been increased a lot since yesterday.

When is your mining started and what's your hash rate? We can estimate whether you should solo or mining on pool.

[poolers]

Even 7.6 GH/s seems wrong. Where are all these people?  Usually if a new coin has even 2 or 3 GH/s net hashrate the forum is moving a lot quicker and also the trading volume.  I doubt there is 7.5 GH/s worth of solo mining going on and only < 100 MH/s of pool mining. With a diff this high people would be pool mining at this point but the pool hashrates are dying. It still seems bugged, it doesnt seem like very many people are mining this at all.

[DarkKnight]

Even 7.6 GH/s seems wrong. Where are all these people?

Agreed. 7600MH/s? Private pool or solomining? Seems unlikely, unless some LTC pool has jumped in, but hasn't actually announced it. In any case, Dev seems to have had poor control from the beginning. Interesting idea, but SHA256 & Scrypt communities are quite a bit competitive with each other. I'm not certain an endeavor like this would ever work. Maybe Scrypt & some variant, like A-nFactor with different difficulties so GPU Miners could keep pace with ASICs.

There's an idea: A coin with different PoW algorithms suited to each mining clique, ASIC, GPUs, CPUs, all with their own difficulty and equal chance of getting coins. -- You heard it here first folks.  

[fusioncoin]

Even 7.6 GH/s seems wrong. Where are all these people?  Usually if a new coin has even 2 or 3 GH/s net hashrate the forum is moving a lot quicker and also the trading volume.  I doubt there is 7.5 GH/s worth of solo mining going on and only < 100 MH/s of pool mining. With a diff this high people would be pool mining at this point but the pool hashrates are dying. It still seems bugged, it doesnt seem like very many people are mining this at all.

It's just people not mining on our pool. Since fusioncoin is merged minable, it's easier to have high hashrate, cause you don't know who is merged mining fusioncoin. The scenario could be quite different from other coins.
BTW, there's no trick in hash rate calculation, just grab average block time for scrypt blocks and difficulty, and we have hashrate=(diff*2^32/avg_time) or roughly 4.2GH/s * diff / avg_time

I could even show you a gist to calculate that, or you can check our source code for function "getnetworkhashps"

[niothor]

Even 7.6 GH/s seems wrong. Where are all these people?  Usually if a new coin has even 2 or 3 GH/s net hashrate the forum is moving a lot quicker and also the trading volume.  I doubt there is 7.5 GH/s worth of solo mining going on and only < 100 MH/s of pool mining. With a diff this high people would be pool mining at this point but the pool hashrates are dying. It still seems bugged, it doesnt seem like very many people are mining this at all.

Thera are some private pools that have that hashing power. Could be one of them if the numbers are correct.

[fusioncoin]

I'm trying to sell some FSC, but the price is so low....  This coin is not easy to mine.  Difficulty is high.  Dunno why the sellers are selling for such a low price.

I cancelled my sell order and became a buyer instead, lol.  I know there's premine, so my only request is that the premine is not being sold at such a low price.

On that note; how do we get an invite on the #FusionCoin channel?

We've added a list of transaction from the address in genesis block on our block explorer. Check it out. The list is updated daily.

[poolers]

Sure there are some big pools that have that kind of hashing power but they dont tend to jump on coins with no trading volume. They also tend to dump right away and there arent even that many sell orders. 0.00000051 is the highest buy order which is very low profit if someone sells at that price and its been sitting at that for quite a while.

I get that the code to calculate hashrate is simple, but you yourself said it was bugged and has been updated so in that case is definitely possible to be wrong. If regular miners arent participating in this coin and all of the hashrate is coming from some private pool, they wont have anyone to sell their coins too. The theory that 7.5 GH/s is coming from some private pool seems unlikely. It really just seems that not many people are mining this and the net hashrate is still wrong.

[fusioncoin]

Sure there are some big pools that have that kind of hashing power but they dont tend to jump on coins with no trading volume. They also tend to dump right away and there arent even that many sell orders. 0.00000051 is the highest buy order which is very low profit if someone sells at that price and its been sitting at that for quite a while.

I get that the code to calculate hashrate is simple, but you yourself said it was bugged and has been updated so in that case is definitely possible to be wrong. If regular miners arent participating in this coin and all of the hashrate is coming from some private pool, they wont have anyone to sell their coins too. The theory that 7.5 GH/s is coming from some private pool seems unlikely. It really just seems that not many people are mining this and the net hashrate is still wrong.

Simple calculation, simple mistake, bug fixed.
Well just face it....
The difficulty won't lie.
Even it's 4 min per block , with current difficulty 240, you need 4.2Gh/s. Not saying the recent average block time of scrypt is 2 min.

[getfun12345]

Sure there are some big pools that have that kind of hashing power but they dont tend to jump on coins with no trading volume. They also tend to dump right away and there arent even that many sell orders. 0.00000051 is the highest buy order which is very low profit if someone sells at that price and its been sitting at that for quite a while.

I get that the code to calculate hashrate is simple, but you yourself said it was bugged and has been updated so in that case is definitely possible to be wrong. If regular miners arent participating in this coin and all of the hashrate is coming from some private pool, they wont have anyone to sell their coins too. The theory that 7.5 GH/s is coming from some private pool seems unlikely. It really just seems that not many people are mining this and the net hashrate is still wrong.

Some pools are mining other coins merged with fusioncoin. and they don't want to tell the miners.

[Blackblanco]

so i noticed the official btc/fsc pool diff is at 453622 with 3 th/s!   how does this affect the scrypt miners ability to find blocks?

[fusioncoin]

so i noticed the official btc/fsc pool diff is at 453622 with 3 th/s!   how does this affect the scrypt miners ability to find blocks?

Please refer to http://fusioncoin.org/fsc.php for network hash rate, or use "getnetworkhashps_sha256d" and "getnetworkhashps_scrypt" to check hash rate in your fusioncoin-QT.
Notice that, our pool is not the only place where people mining FusionCoin. So let's take a look at the sha256 side, with diff 453622, and we know each algorithm is targetting 4 minutes per block, and diff 1 requires 2^32 hashes(4.2G hashes)
we can calculate hash rate of sha256:  453622*(4.2G Hashes) / 240 seconds  = 7938Gh/s = 7.9 Th/s

Another thing to be aware of is: sha256 and scrypt are different hashing algorithm, scrypt is much more difficult than sha256. With decent GPU, you can get 400Mh/s in sha256 but only 400Kh/s in scrypt. So don't be surprised at the 3Th/s.
The bitcoin network is already 28000Th/s but litecoin network is merely 130Gh/s.

Back to your question, the anwser is NO.
These two algorithm is with their separated difficulty. Hash rate rising in scrypt will only affect user on scrypt side, and vise versa.

[DragoStefan]

http://fusioncoin.org/fsc.php Where are the 9GH???

[rubberpool]

Welcome to FusionCoin Pool!

fsc.pool.mn offers:
0% fee
Powerful dedicated server
Friendly support via email, jabber or support forums
Skilled admin
DDOS protection
Giveaways - stay tuned!

Join us!

this pool is for scrypt miners only

[fusioncoin]

http://fusioncoin.org/fsc.php Where are the 9GH???

Network(Scrypt)   9.78 G H/s

[achow101]

Many pools closing because non profit of this coin.
Even official pool past 8 hour last found block.... shame