DEVELOPERS MUST THINK DIFFERENTLY

[Lizzylove1]

I kind off wonder why we keep having some repetitions of already existing project, and the developers keep saying "oooh the existing project is not scalable" for example, some projects have been born because of low transaction per seconds of the ethereum network(TPS), which of course does cause serious problem for the overall network ecosystem. This ethereum developers have moved to try and arrest by the upgrade called "Constantinople".

The world have many areas that need the help of blockchain, for example the recently concluded election in Nigeria was filled with violence, killing, rigging and snatching of ballot  papers, together with mass voters apartheid in subsequent election. All these would have just been handled with the aid of blockchain voting, without fear of been hacked or hijacked. The sighted example and many more is just one area that really defines adoption. It's possible to create coin and during the election period, the government can be made to pay for the blockchain services by buying the ecosystem token, which is not a must.

The bottom-line is that: Instead of having many failed projects in this space, developers should come forth with strong and life application project and not to keep imitating other projects like we currently have a spray of exchanges with their tokens, the immediate gain of quick money should be kept aside and developers should try and bring up a feasible challenging problem, to solve many human yearnings.

[Viceroy]

There are many good projects that aim to help people. But there are also many projects to make money. This is how the world works.

[Ucy]

The improvements matter alot. If for example ethereum developers refuse to accept an improvement for ethereum blockchain (for right or wrong reasons) you could simply fork Ethereum and make the changes yourself.. If the improvements actually solved the problem safely the forked blockchain could eventually overtake Ethereum in terms of price, value and transaction volume.

As regards election on blockchain, I have no doubt in my mind that it can be done. But hypocrites and crooks will never let that be .  They could end up creating their own form of blockchain when put under pressure - sort of a private blockchain and the elites/governments alone would control the nodes

[BADBITCH]

I kind off wonder why we keep having some repetitions of already existing project, and the developers keep saying "oooh the existing project is not scalable" for example, some projects have been born because of low transaction per seconds of the ethereum network(TPS), which of course does cause serious problem for the overall network ecosystem. This ethereum developers have moved to try and arrest by the upgrade called "Constantinople".

The world have many areas that need the help of blockchain, for example the recently concluded election in Nigeria was filled with violence, killing, rigging and snatching of ballot  papers, together with mass voters apartheid in subsequent election. All these would have just been handled with the aid of blockchain voting, without fear of been hacked or hijacked. The sighted example and many more is just one area that really defines adoption. It's possible to create coin and during the election period, the government can be made to pay for the blockchain services by buying the ecosystem token, which is not a must.

The bottom-line is that: Instead of having many failed projects in this space, developers should come forth with strong and life application project and not to keep imitating other projects like we currently have a spray of exchanges with their tokens, the immediate gain of quick money should be kept aside and developers should try and bring up a feasible challenging problem, to solve many human yearnings.

This is what happens when greed sets in and we all want profits in any means
Even the forks lately have been shit coins as wel

We hunters or investors just need to keep our straight and focus on the real projects by good researches I

[muncuss]

developer try to find excuse for creating their own ICO and make money.
Many (top) projects have their own advantage, but instead working together to create ultimate cryptocurrency, they keep away one from another and compete for brand, fame and money.
for majority shitcoin, their dev didn't think to make practical product, but easy money. And probably they don't have any idea how to make one

This world don't need another cryptocurrency, but more tech, practical product and improvement

[StephenJH]

I kind off wonder why we keep having some repetitions of already existing project, and the developers keep saying "oooh the existing project is not scalable" for example, some projects have been born because of low transaction per seconds of the ethereum network(TPS), which of course does cause serious problem for the overall network ecosystem. This ethereum developers have moved to try and arrest by the upgrade called "Constantinople".

The world have many areas that need the help of blockchain, for example the recently concluded election in Nigeria was filled with violence, killing, rigging and snatching of ballot  papers, together with mass voters apartheid in subsequent election. All these would have just been handled with the aid of blockchain voting, without fear of been hacked or hijacked. The sighted example and many more is just one area that really defines adoption. It's possible to create coin and during the election period, the government can be made to pay for the blockchain services by buying the ecosystem token, which is not a must.

The bottom-line is that: Instead of having many failed projects in this space, developers should come forth with strong and life application project and not to keep imitating other projects like we currently have a spray of exchanges with their tokens, the immediate gain of quick money should be kept aside and developers should try and bring up a feasible challenging problem, to solve many human yearnings.

New forks happen for increasing the scalability of transaction per second but creating a new project for exactly the same purpose doesn't suit these ideas in my opinion.

[SlimShadyMmp]

Learn to iterate the good ones you want and leave those ones you deem not useful to you but the truth is this blockchain and cryptocurrencies are tied to ICOs which are basically coming from different place with different developer looking to make their product superior man Is a market ground.  And seriously how do you think a country that have dozens of issues with card reader is able to develop blockchain for election Dude Cmon dont let Crypto twist your head and ego that way

[chanc3r]

I kind off wonder why we keep having some repetitions of already existing project, and the developers keep saying "oooh the existing project is not scalable" for example, some projects have been born because of low transaction per seconds of the ethereum network(TPS), which of course does cause serious problem for the overall network ecosystem. This ethereum developers have moved to try and arrest by the upgrade called "Constantinople".

The world have many areas that need the help of blockchain, for example the recently concluded election in Nigeria was filled with violence, killing, rigging and snatching of ballot  papers, together with mass voters apartheid in subsequent election. All these would have just been handled with the aid of blockchain voting, without fear of been hacked or hijacked. The sighted example and many more is just one area that really defines adoption. It's possible to create coin and during the election period, the government can be made to pay for the blockchain services by buying the ecosystem token, which is not a must.

The bottom-line is that: Instead of having many failed projects in this space, developers should come forth with strong and life application project and not to keep imitating other projects like we currently have a spray of exchanges with their tokens, the immediate gain of quick money should be kept aside and developers should try and bring up a feasible challenging problem, to solve many human yearnings.

New forks happen for increasing the scalability of transaction per second but creating a new project for exactly the same purpose doesn't suit these ideas in my opinion.

and that can be categorized as a plagiarized such platform. EOS, NEO, TRON and many more are only creating a new platform that will try to solve the scalability problem in ethereum platform. that's only an example
so many plagiarized projects

[Herbert2020]

it won't be fixed until people start changing their attitude towards altcoins.
so far everyone who has ever entered the altcoin world wants one thing and one thing only and that is to make a quick profit and exit.
the same thing is true in bitcoin too but at least in bitcoin these people are not everyone. there are still a great number of people who get into bitcoin because of what it offers as a decentralized currency.

so until people stop wanting pump and dump shitcoins that can give them 1000% profit in a couple of days, we won't see developers improve their skills because they are making a lot of money and that makes them lazy.

[Kiweikoo]

I think it's not just the work of developers to think differently but everyone in the crypto market, because it is now easy for one person to come up with a great idea and since it's a free market, we might have devs who can volunteer in developing the project and maybe even reward the member of the community who came up with the idea.

What you said is right and it's a challenge to every member of the the community to think outside the box and be able to come up with a great idea that will benefit all of us.

[judeafante]

There are many good projects that aim to help people. But there are also many projects to make money. This is how the world works.

I agree but we can have the best of both world, we can have a project that the community can help and at the same time make money out of it, like Ethereum and Eos, both have contributed a lot to the community, but there are also projects that tried to to duplicate and surpass these two but they always failed.

[tsaroz]

There are varieties of variables that are responsible for the success of a project.
But the prime one is the project itself. Every investors wants to see the project they got involved be a success.
The next thing is to deliver the success as a profit to the investors.
And the team works as a mediator to balance between capital and profit.

[crispyfry211]

For developers of bounty projects and ico right now should be smart in selecting products to choose and should have a new gimmick and its outcome should be fine. And they should be sure to be secured and earn bigger investors in when they invest in a new project and will definitely ico will earn big funds.

[Kopyleft]

It's pretty simple, 'almost' everyone is after quick profits and many a project already have an exit strategy once they can be free from possible legal actions. Crowd funding is profitable, and it's very easy to get away after creating a half arse project with little or no originality or usefulness.

To your second paragraph, a couple of countries are experimenting with blockchain in electioneering processes and some are already practicing.

[Tipstar]

ICO is just a tool and token developers are just the employee of the company.
The success or failure of the project entirely depends on the team and the project.
The nature of coin, the platform it's hosted on or the exchange it's been listed on makes a negligible effect on the overall success of a project..\

[vv181]

We need to specify what kind of project that keeps coming up and so on. There some project that completely forked useless coins created for scamming. Also, there is a project that created because of some major improvement within the underlying technologies. The current situation of the cryptocurrencies development spaces forces developers to do a hard-fork or a soft-fork, So there is nothing wrong about it.

Although Bitcoin is indeed revolutionary technology, However, it is not some magic sprinkle things that all kind of spaces able to support. There is a thing that scales well with BItcoin, and some don't.

[dimonarka]

I agree with you that creating new projects based on old ones is stupid since each project is created to solve certain problems, but you need to understand that there are a lot of blockchain technology areas and you can find such a sphere if you wish.

[gantez]

The world have many areas that need the help of blockchain, for example the recently concluded election in Nigeria was filled with violence, killing, rigging and snatching of ballot  papers, together with mass voters apartheid in subsequent election. All these would have just been handled with the aid of blockchain voting, without fear of been hacked or hijacked.

This is actually one way that block chain can help a society but we have to also remember that a country that will rely on block chain for a kind of sensitive matter as election would have been highly tech to be able to utilize it maximally. I heard in the same election, card readers were malfunctioning, these are all tech issues.

[ife2020]

Don’t expect developers to think differently
Either the project is an exchange or a platform or e-commerce

Every developer motives is an eventual profit

[Erickan]

Why are there so many garbage projects, the only symbolic project still exists? That is because all 90% of existing projects on CMC are almost meaningless, garbage projects. Typically projects that follow bitcoin, they only create those projects for the purpose of making money. It is not useful for life, not a bit of application value.