Stay Calm, IEOs aren't a threat

[hummer113]

Will probably decrease the reward for the bounty and the task, but the bounty is not going anywhere.

[1715205778]

1715205778

[1715205778]

1715205778

[Danslip]

Will probably decrease the reward for the bounty and the task, but the bounty is not going anywhere.

Come on, why it comes first to mind when something is not right in the project? Bounty hunters are like third world countries in treatment by others and bounty payments are usually decreased in such cases.

[mv1986]

Absolutely right. There is not such a thought that IEOs will all be successful and there will be no bounty. Today the IEOs in Binance are successful and do not need marketing, and all currencies will not be able to continue with IEO.

It is because nowadays it is something very special to be a hosted IEO on Binance, but once the number increases significantly other measures for marketing maybe required again.

[Gabali126]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

You are very right. I am not scared of the IEOs. I am even optimistic that with it we shall be having more quality projects to campaign in future. Less scams, etc.

[Thanasis]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

Don't say some other promotion is going to better than bitcointalk,I can bet the bitcointalk will always bring more crypto related investors than on trading platforms because there where people come to trade but the real investors won't trade at all.

[Quintrix]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

The ICOs scam which was rampant was the reason why some project owner switch to IEO in other proof their genuinely to investors but the IEO using doesn't proof the profitable of a project but at least it reduce the risk of been scam. However, we can't decide if the IEO will take over ICO because the number of new project which are base on ICO are huge than IEO.

Yes that is true I don't have the right data but I guess it's 2 out 10 ICO there are still many projects that go for the usual ICO where they hired bounty hunters to do their marketing, but if the scamming continues we will have a big reverse, which means the number of IEO will be greater than ICO.

[smyslov]

They can be a threat if investors will continue to support IEO as a safe investment, it's hard for investors to find a legit and profit from these so many ICO and they want a crowdfunding that will take out the hassle of researching if the project is good or not, and investors wants a ready market right away.

[duyduc256]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

There will certainly be a lot of bonus campaigns in IEO projects because most ICO projects are now looking to get listed on large exchanges so that more goals can be easily achieved. I believe that this will limit a lot of risks to investors because they can choose a lot of good projects so if there is a chance the bounty hunter will also benefit from these projects.

[mcnocon2]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

I agree, IEOs are not a threat to bounty campaigns. That was two different things, every projects need the help of the community to advertise their project in different social media platforms and spread awareness as well on what their project can offer.

[george_hured]

Calmly today can really show good chances for your future deposit. Of course, there are so many opportunities for the current situation, and I think IEO in the future will be much more beneficial for use than for example ICO

[icalical]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

That sounds so ridiculous, where does that idea come from? No matter how they chose to raise their fund, ICO, IEO, or STO? They will still need advertising, in any kind, and promotion in social media by real people is one of the best options. And this forum is the biggest forum for Cryptocurrency. IEO is just the same as ICO, it just facilitated by an exchange.

[ujinice]

IEO will be successful until the first disastrous project appears that will bring losses to investors, after this happens IEO’s popularity will be equal to ICO. Exchanges today enjoy the "Skim strategy", due to the new idea of initializing tokens.

[VAGR]

IEO will be successful until the first disastrous project appears that will bring losses to investors, after this happens IEO’s popularity will be equal to ICO. Exchanges today enjoy the "Skim strategy", due to the new idea of initializing tokens.

In the event of a project failure or deception of investors, this will greatly harm the exchange  of which IEO was conducted. I think big exchanges are hardly to let it be. And they will carefully select projects before being placed on their platform.

[boazsalosa]

IEO will be successful until the first disastrous project appears that will bring losses to investors, after this happens IEO’s popularity will be equal to ICO. Exchanges today enjoy the "Skim strategy", due to the new idea of initializing tokens.

In the event of a project failure or deception of investors, this will greatly harm the exchange  of which IEO was conducted. I think big exchanges are hardly to let it be. And they will carefully select projects before being placed on their platform.

Yes, right, maybe a lot of projects are listed on their IEO on the "Binance" big exchange, but I think that there is a selection to go there so ICO will always be there if the IEO is rejected in the big market.

[mv1986]

They can be a threat if investors will continue to support IEO as a safe investment, it's hard for investors to find a legit and profit from these so many ICO and they want a crowdfunding that will take out the hassle of researching if the project is good or not, and investors wants a ready market right away.

Why should they be a threat to investors? If a well known exchange hosts an offering you can at least expect that exchange to have done some thorough checks on that project. If Binance does an ICO I would feel better than participating in some random ICO.

[Dacosta Osei-Tutu]

When a coin does IEO, the coin only gets exposed to the investors on that particular exchange so hunters will still be needed to spread the good news about the project on other forums.

[dhemasm]

Maybe the IEO The bounty hunter is a threat but this is a good step for the future of crypto. But that does not mean that the bounty hunter is completely dead, there are still airdrops or the like. Even now they have many platforms that give place for bounty hunter, right? Like steemit where we write then get an incentive when we receive a vote or other platforms (it's a lot, I can't say one by one). Well, the community should be happy because a large exchange has begun to integrate IEO instead consider this as a threat.

[evanescence]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

Bounty campaigns were always at the expense of buyers - they happened because ICO projects didn't really lose anything from having one. With IEO-s the exchange doesn't have any interest in initiating one.
The hope for bounties is the failure of IEO-s, with Binance not letting anyone in their IEO-s it is not impossible

[aioc]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

So you mean after the project is already in the market, they can still hire bounty hunters for the continuation of marketing, I think this is even better because of potential investors and bounty hunters will not have to wait for the coin to get listed, they can trade it anytime,, I have seen it many coins like XTENCOIN and CCN where they still do bounty campaign even after they are already in the market.

[Pffrt]

Very few projects will need marketing because if a project launch on a popular exchange, that exchange will work as their marketing, nothing extra will be required. So, I don't think bounty hunters have a good future. It's better for the forum too. No signature bounty spammers will be here to write thousands of comments.