Stay Calm, IEOs aren't a threat

[Kiweikoo]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

I don't think bounties can ever die even if the ICO market dies because of IEO, one way or the other people will always need the services of bounties because it's not just about being able to raise large amount of money from conducting IEO but be able to raise a large community because what makes a good project is not money but large community, so am definitely sure that whether ICO or not, the services of bounties will still always be needed, and beside not every project owners will have so much money to run IEO so I believe ICO will still exist.

[asriloni]

Both ICO & IEO have a same purpose which is collecting money. I think to fullfil that target need a lot of helps. For example advertisement, the company will need bounty hunters to do this job. As long as ICO/IEO still exist bounty campaign will always there.

yes you are right, but for now like a Project that starts the IEO does not require a bounty campaign. I saw in just a few hours all the tokens were sold out. but it won't last long, if many projects use this method. The IEO will look the same as a normal token sale. so the bounty campaign is definitely needed.

Not sure about that but so many people know about IEO can be manipulated by the exchange site easily. Thousand people can't even buy some pennies from some IEO in binance exchange and they are feeling doubt about binance was doing a shady thing in its IEO.

[Osarman]

Very few projects will need marketing because if a project launch on a popular exchange, that exchange will work as their marketing, nothing extra will be required. So, I don't think bounty hunters have a good future. It's better for the forum too. No signature bounty spammers will be here to write thousands of comments.

Totally agreed. A famous businessman ELON MUSK says that they spent not even a cent over the advertisement of Tesla and the billion dollars that other competitor spent over advertisement were spent on the product and we found our costumer without even advertising. So I think that if your project is great, you do not really need advertisements and exchange will let people know. We are done with ICOs. Bounty hunters will be in hot water.

[whirlcoin]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

I definitely trust it was not a threat again because a lots of people had confidence about IEO investment and it will definitely give result positively I hope people will accept it very soon.

[fortunecrypto]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

I'm still longing for a time where bounty hunters are paid in bitcoin and we can have lots of coins to promote that are already in the market, but unfortunately, we only see few coins like this, I've counted and there are only two of these like CCN, Azartpay, hopefully we will have ten or more.

[sell my ac_________nt]

I think the ICOs market is already changing and soon there will be no ICOs. Instead, it will come to STO and IEO. As we see the bounty is not so necessary to promote the project. This function is already engaged in the exchange.

[trash321]

Time as usual will put everything in its place. I think everything here seems very, very strange despite the fact that IEO actually looks really super strange. This is, after all, a hybrid model, because, on the whole, there are few of the funds that they began to receive from traders for exchanges.

[robelneo]

They are going to be a threat if these ICO's will not shape up and continue to scam people, millions of dollars have been lost already, investors will soon have enough and they will only look for IEO because it's much safer and profitable compared to months long ICO.

[upsidedown75]

well not all ico will go there in IEO
many requirement there that all ico can pass, so the ICO and bounty still needed here
advertisement is very important to attract more investor

The idea of IEO won’t even completely disfavor bounty hunters, although they might end up not getting free tokens again but at least, they can be rest assured too that whatever project they are investing their money into is safe, certain percentage of hunters who participate in bounty hunting do so not because they cannot afford to bring out money to invest.

But, because of they will rather work to get it free rather than investing in a project they are also not sure of its success once the ICO ended since the market is full of uncertainties.More so, like you said, not many ICO can afford to list their project on IEO for now due to exchange rules and regulations.

[futile-resistance]

Ieo is just the the same kind of ICO or STO, but it had different purpose of each of them. But they have the same definition to gather fund.

Sure they have the same crowd funding definition and we can as well say that it’s structure its typically ICO structure,  but this time around going through exchanges that has verified them and can guarantee that yes, it is a good project.

IEO projects builds the confidence of investors more than the ICO since it is being operated directly by the exchanges and investors can have people to hold responsible in the event that something goes wrong with the investment, because this is the assurance exchanges gives through the IEO that investors are in safe hand. Most IEO projects don’t also go through campaigns like ICO does.

[enhu]

Releasing an IEO for token sale is a good decission for those people willing lot of tokens from token sale its very attractable and soon their token will list on which IEO exchange sales.

I have to admit there are more people going to invest on a project if an exchange like binance will conduct is crowdfunding. Investors are just incline to trusting such set up because they know the token could end up being listed to this exchange as well. There are however criteria for exchange to partner up with a team to do an IEO and not all team are willing to pay the exchange.

[pieppiep]

Time as usual will put everything in its place. I think everything here seems very, very strange despite the fact that IEO actually looks really super strange. This is, after all, a hybrid model, because, on the whole, there are few of the funds that they began to receive from traders for exchanges.

I think those who will be affected by the failure of the ICO or IEO are those exchanges, so the exchange place that holds the IEO should really select a good project so that it will not have a negative impact on anyone participating in the IEO.

[Akoldi_ibk]

IEO projects builds the confidence of investors more than the ICO since it is being operated directly by the exchanges and investors can have people to hold responsible in the event that something goes wrong with the investment, because this is the assurance exchanges gives through the IEO that investors are in safe hand. Most IEO projects don’t also go through campaigns like ICO does.

IEO projects do go through campaigns like ICO does as I have seen few of these IEOs still promoting their projects through bounty campaigns. I believe campaign will still be a valuable tool in this new ecosystem.

[Catmurs]

I'm not really worried , I try to participate in io , and I think everyone needs to think about it , because it is possible to make very good money

[nxnqauff]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

I am hearing IEO for the first time. What is that? How is it different than ICO or STO these days?

[acheampong64]

But if all team wants to do IEO, they would prefer it to be in a big one like Binance, they'd all be lining to be scheduled too. I don't think a team will prefer their IEO in smaller exchange like livecoin or some other DEX, would they?

I see your point as a very interesting one but we should note that the bull run is no respecter of this language. In a hyping market, Binance and other "big" exchanges would delay things trying to schedule everything and so people will switch to fast track methods and that's where the IEO super spring will start. Your statement will always be valid until a hype market comes lol.

[Reid]

ICO's had been established and I think there are lesser companies now who will start from scratch again.

It is also the easiest method and user friendly way to make a crowd funding.
There is still STO which is being advertised and yet it seems it cannot go to the way ICO did. Some just wants to stay with the older style and just do their projects as good as they could to invite more investors.
Something new will not help, it will just divide us once again.

[AlexMilton]

We created a chat on the subject of IEO, there we discuss everything that is interesting and can help make a successful IEO. Here is a link if anyone is interested: https://t.me/ieoone

[Mmesooma1]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

People seem to be concerned about IEOs and how they pose to be a threat but I always rebuke it as uninformed assertion. Bounty is a form of marketing and as such very crucial to the development and growth of the industry. Cryptocurency needs bounty hunters more.

[EdenHazard]

Time as usual will put everything in its place. I think everything here seems very, very strange despite the fact that IEO actually looks really super strange. This is, after all, a hybrid model, because, on the whole, there are few of the funds that they began to receive from traders for exchanges.

I think those who will be affected by the failure of the ICO or IEO are those exchanges, so the exchange place that holds the IEO should really select a good project so that it will not have a negative impact on anyone participating in the IEO.

I guess an exchange will work extra to find a legit project and has a potential, if an exchange hasty to accept any project without know the ins and out the project I believe the exchange will find as a result. I guess they should have someone or team who has an ability to find more a deep information about the project either its teams, road maps or another important things related to project.