Stay Calm, IEOs aren't a threat

[dimastegar]

Initially I was worried about the development of the IEO which could be said to be quite a lot, which could have an impact on the reduction in bounty campaigns. However, I think returning to the respective IEO projects. They also still need promotion for their projects. And bounty campaign is one of the best solutions for promoting ICO or IEO projects.

[btc-facebook]

Well I don't think bountier will not have a bright future because of IEO, projects will still need an advertisement for it's project, gaining some audience and investor through bounty program will still worked.

[mrdeposit]

Well I don't think bountier will not have a bright future because of IEO, projects will still need an advertisement for it's project, gaining some audience and investor through bounty program will still worked.

Advertising is always necessary, maybe IEOs changed situation little, but not all of the projects can be sold at binance. Also, most ICOs are waiting for good condition. Everything will come back when status is good.

[Enzo05]

Part of the marketing strategy is to keep promoting your product and bounty hunters are there to help. IEO's is not a threat because still, they need to promote their product using bounty campaigns so they can well disseminate their project.

[mardaed]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

IEO for me is better than ICOs because all of this project must be in the secure platform or exchange and also is will avoid to many scammer unlike ICOs.

[Deylandra]

Okay but doesn't ICO sound catchier than IEO?

[Botnake]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

IEO for me is better than ICOs because all of this project must be in the secure platform or exchange and also is will avoid to many scammer unlike ICOs.

I would agree wit that, the new trend has made this market revive.
It's good now that we have this platform and we can minimize the risk in investing in ICO.
This is still called ICO IMO since it's crowdsale offering but through a secure way which is from exchanges.
We should also be wise in choosing exchanges, choose only those who have good reputation.

[beckspace]

I think, the projects that will make the IEO will need advertising and promotion just like the projects that make ICO. Therefore, I think that the projects that make IEO will always need bounty hunters to have a big community. I see that many old projects that  listed on exchanges are also organizing a bounty campaign. So bounty works never ends.

[RockDJ]

Hopefully we will assume so because good bounties are diminishing rapidly. IEOs has posed to be a better fund raising alternative to project developers who need IEOs to raise funds than bounty hunters to pool investors to their ICOs

[Yutikas_11920]

I think, the projects that will make the IEO will need advertising and promotion just like the projects that make ICO. Therefore, I think that the projects that make IEO will always need bounty hunters to have a big community. I see that many old projects that  listed on exchanges are also organizing a bounty campaign. So bounty works never ends.

indeed advertising and promotion can be a good strategy from the IEO project to make the offer sell well, but the most important thing for the success of the IEO is not only from the marketing strategy, but usually investors will see from the projects and platforms that they want to develop, very useful for many people or not.

[ivankozloviz]

All exchanges are not enough to stamp projects, so in any case, the ICO will be popular and in particular the bounty services will also be needed!

[BitFinnese]

I absolutely agree that IEOs aren't a threat instead it's the KYC involved which may drive some investors away. However, I believe a IEOs are better than some ICOs.

There are strict rules that an exchange is implementing before hosting an IEO.  They need to submit their team profile and the exchange make it sure that there are real people behind the project.  Remember the exchange need to protect their reputation, so they will be the first one to conduct research on the project.  If there is no red flag then the IEO will commence.  With this option, I agree that IEO is way better than ICO in terms of verifying people behind the project.


I agree with OP, there are too many crowdfunding projects that exchanges cannot accommodate and so bounty will still be needed. 

[nicster551]

I absolutely agree that IEOs aren't a threat instead it's the KYC involved which may drive some investors away. However, I believe a IEOs are better than some ICOs.

There are strict rules that an exchange is implementing before hosting an IEO.  They need to submit their team profile and the exchange make it sure that there are real people behind the project.  Remember the exchange need to protect their reputation, so they will be the first one to conduct research on the project.  If there is no red flag then the IEO will commence.  With this option, I agree that IEO is way better than ICO in terms of verifying people behind the project.

Not all exchange does that, I know some exchanges that hosts IEO and doesnt care about the identity of the team. They just want to get paid. But several known exchanges are very careful like binance, bittrex, huobi and kucoin.

[Golstrim]

IEOs should repeat sucess of ICOs. Probably impact won't be so huge, but I will try to catch as much IEOs as possible in order to increase my portfolio.
I consider IEO as a less risky way to invest money compared to ICO

[Ziskinberg]

IEOs should repeat sucess of ICOs. Probably impact won't be so huge, but I will try to catch as much IEOs as possible in order to increase my portfolio.
I consider IEO as a less risky way to invest money compared to ICO

Less risky but high potential for the investors.

This idea was considered successful already, the number of ICOs now have decrease as they know it will not be patronize by investors.
As an investor, it's just right to find a platform where they can minimize the risk and IEO was the answer for that.

[kevinex]

Less risky but high potential for the investors.

This idea was considered successful already, the number of ICOs now have decrease as they know it will not be patronize by investors.
As an investor, it's just right to find a platform where they can minimize the risk and IEO was the answer for that.

investors must know which exchanges are trusted and which are not. after all, as more IEOs grow, their success will also diminish, not as well as at the beginning of the IEO's popularity because its success reached hardcap in a few moments.

[xvids]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

It is true bounty hunters would always be needed in the crypto industry to promote new project's .
But the rewards are killing the hunters with just a small amount of profit who would want to continue on promoting some scam project or a low value crypto.
We will always be needed but as much as they need as we also need money and a good amount of reward to continue on working.

[steveabrahams]

In my opinion IEOs are a threat for bounty hunters. If no investor invest on ICOs any more and prefer invest on IEO, i'm sure the project owner will change to IEO too and there will be no more bounties. IEO on big exchanges like binance, no need much advertisement too.

[trauchot]

IEO currently shows itself very well and as I see many companies that wanted to make ICO even decided to switch to IEO, because at the moment this is the best way to get money from investors, and when the demand for IEO will fall then we will see what will happen with the sphere of IEO.

[futile-resistance]

yes im agree with you, IEO was the revolution of traditional ICO whos already full of scammers, IEO promising safe of investor fund because fund raising held on third party exchanger, so there is a guarantee of investor fund cant be stolen.

I think that IEOs are not threat at all in the crypto space. They have been able enough to overcome the shortcomings posed by ICOs. ICOs though good for fundraising in the initial stages of a token selling company had disadvantages and risk. Still, they had been banned by some countries around the world due to which crypto startups in those countries could not really get the funds they needed so IEO is a good option for them.

I see many companies that wanted to make ICO even decided to switch to IEO, because at the moment this is the best way to get money from investors

No surprises in this . Devs will switch over to the hottest platform whereas they actually do not need to do so. Yes, just focusing on their actual concepts itself more than enough to attract decent amount of investors but they are all chasing into the new platform so that they will hit definite targets up to their hardcap.