Stay Calm, IEOs aren't a threat

[seleme]

IEOs aren't a threat. What makes you think that? I believe IEOs are rather introduced to replace ICOs to help curb the scam activities and to make things and investment easier.

Exactly, now investors have gotten this opportunity as an alternative to ICOs because these offerings are secure and trusty as compare to ICOs. Due to the involvement of scammers in ICOs the whole reputation destroyed. Who says IEOs are threat? There is no point in to keep this opinion because all of us are observing and noticing the progress and performance of IEOs which is going very well on secure exchanges.

IEOs are new options for investors to get the token of platform without worrying about scammers. Scammers don't like this token sale model for an obvious reasons, performance of scammers goes down ever month. ICOs are outdated, IEOs are increasing the popularity of investment projects.

[daporivera]

IEOs have been around for a while, no known negativity have been attached to IEO projects. It is a scam free space, every one can give it a chance as it is better than ICOs.

[ali115112]

As the IEO trend is going well and all IEO success in exchanges including Binance so IEO will be grow more in coming days so this is not a threat ,you can invest in IEO.

[nikola22]

Nothing has changed with respect to bounty. ICE also makes bounty companies. The exchanges do not want to take on IEO advertising because they have everything on molasses.

you are right. I have seen several bounty campaigns from IEO projects and they even look better than bounties from ICO projects.

[coino.org]

Yes, IEO should be profitable scheme, so I suggest that some of you guys would easily try to invest and in most cases you guys earn money in crypto industry

[anggracoin]

Of course, the IEO is not a threat, but as a more effective step than ICO for the success of the project. Media promotion will always be needed as a link to information from the project to the community. So, bounty hunters don't have to worry and still have many opportunities to make a profit.

[stripykitteh]

Of course, the IEO is not a threat, but as a more effective step than ICO for the success of the project. Media promotion will always be needed as a link to information from the project to the community. So, bounty hunters don't have to worry and still have many opportunities to make a profit.

IEO's are a threat to their own campaign. If they take too much time trying to gather money then there could be another competitor with the same idea able to launch their product first before the IEO/ICO is finished.

[kalstarzz]

from the beginning I never thought that the IEO would be a threat to bounty hunters, even I am grateful, with the existence of the IEO we will be more protected from scamer (there are only a few scamer in this program). and in fact there are currently many bounty projects with the IEO program, and this is very good.

[Nasonn]

With IEOs launching bounty, bounty hunters will be protected from the usual troubles they experience like unpaid bounties, slashed allocation, and more seriously scam.

[103deltafox]

Initial exchange offering isn't a threat, rather it is good because first the problem of listing wouldn't be a problem if the project is sold out and also bounty hunters are sure of the project they are promoting being list. So it is advantageous.

[nreal]

The problem is that a lot of trading platforms are faking data about IEOs. Many IEOs are sold on small platforms but sell out after only a few minutes. The exchanges are faking data to trick investors, which is adversely affecting genuine IEOs

[puremage111]

Of course IEO is not a threat
The main threat is investors who invested in the IEO but have no knowledge or information on what they are doing

It is never good thing when a project investors are fill with people who have no idea what they are doing or invested
That would results a lot of FUD when price doesn't go up
Thus, making the project salty imo

[Bessta]

Though there is still a possibility that IEOs will end up something as a scam or a bad project, I think most of them are performing better than ICOs and are more worth looking than ICOs. But it's not that I am trying to convince people that get in to IEOs because there are still good ICOs out there.

[Firefoxx]

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

you are right but some exchanges IEO like binance are. I can remember a project whom had its IEO on binance and was running a bounty before that. They had to stop the bounty halfway because had to tell them to do so. So if all projects had to be on binance or we have many exchange like binance,  then it will become a threat

[Lanatsa]

Though there is still a possibility that IEOs will end up something as a scam or a bad project, I think most of them are performing better than ICOs and are more worth looking than ICOs. But it's not that I am trying to convince people that get in to IEOs because there are still good ICOs out there.

Anything do have the possibility and when it comes to investment there's no assurance that you wont really experience such loss.
The difference here between IEO is that it is already traded up on exchange once it launched.You cant differentiate if the project do really
have the potential or just die after such launch.

[miklesm]

That's right, holding an IEO does not mean the project do not need extra advertising. Of course, Exchange is doing the marketing, but some projects are holding Bounty campaigns as well.

[Sendi blackspade team]

That's right, holding an IEO does not mean the project do not need extra advertising. Of course, Exchange is doing the marketing, but some projects are holding Bounty campaigns as well.

even before the launchpad was exchanged for the IEO, many projects have started advertising on several ICO sites and even as you say, there are still many projects that require bounty hunter services. before the sale of the IEO I thought it was important to make everyone know their project.

[dat.ho12492]

Though there is still a possibility that IEOs will end up something as a scam or a bad project, I think most of them are performing better than ICOs and are more worth looking than ICOs. But it's not that I am trying to convince people that get in to IEOs because there are still good ICOs out there.

Almost everyone just thinks that the IEO is a new replacement for the development of projects, and the end of the ICO era but the fact is that as you say, good ICO is constantly appearing, people should not miss and think too negatively about ICO. Instead of maintaining those thoughts, we should have a more general vision, think that the IEO is a new playground for investors, and ICO is an old playground, as long as there are potential projects, investors will focus on that place, more playgrounds, more opportunities

[tetyulfania]

Many coins always connected between ICO and IEO, its the best way how to make price keep higher with many investor will trust about their project and have exchange market for listing at the end of IEO and ICOs.

[Fredomago]

Though there is still a possibility that IEOs will end up something as a scam or a bad project, I think most of them are performing better than ICOs and are more worth looking than ICOs. But it's not that I am trying to convince people that get in to IEOs because there are still good ICOs out there.

Anything do have the possibility and when it comes to investment there's no assurance that you wont really experience such loss.
The difference here between IEO is that it is already traded up on exchange once it launched.You cant differentiate if the project do really
have the potential or just die after such launch.

The results after being listed will the defining factors whether the project is good and can compete with the market or it will just die naturally same with those projects that came from ico's in which didn't take long before being forgotten around this industry, performances will still be the advantage of any projects that wanted to stay and succeed more.