Bitcoin Forum
January 28, 2020, 11:40:58 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Is emtpy ScriptPubKey nonstandard or illegal?  (Read 102 times)
Coding Enthusiast
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 735
Merit: 1355


Novice C♯ Coder


View Profile WWW
March 23, 2019, 06:29:47 AM
Merited by ETFbitcoin (1)
 #1

If illegal, since when?

(If any readers are curious, here is an example: 8ec3e3dd39150798d71c61ffb7cc18ade6f2a2958378e18b7a98eefb709e7322 spent by f21b099d67070a7639d384f30e9b139bab58c27e47368a2d8152f05c14e187b7 which is the smallest tx record)

Projects List+Suggestion box
Donate 1Q9s
bc1q
|
|
|
FinderOuter(0.1.0)Ann-git
Denovo(0.0.0)Ann-git
|
|
|
BitcoinTransactionTool(0.11.0)Ann-git
WatchOnlyBitcoinWallet(3.1.0)Ann-git
SharpPusher(0.10.0)Ann-git
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Pmalek
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1224



View Profile
March 23, 2019, 08:27:03 AM
 #2

I am not sure if this will help you any further but give it a try.
Have a look at this work by Peter Todd, RFC: empty scriptPubKeys and OP_RETURN for marking unspendable txouts
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2013-February/002159.html

I also found an older thread from 2015.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1038794.msg11208171#msg11208171


████████████████████████████
████████▀▀ █▀ █▀ ▀██████████
█████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████
██████████▀     ▀  ▀████████
███████▀ ▀  ▄█▀▀▀█▀▀████████
██████▄      █▄  ▀▀  ▀██████
██████         ▄▄█▄ ▄ ▀█████
█████ ▄         ▀▀ ▄ ▀ █████
██████▌          █▀█▀ ▐█████
███████  ▄▌         ▄ ██████
████████▄█         ▄████████
█████████▀     ▄▄ ▄█████████
████████████████████████████
.JACKMATE'S...........
.
MAJESTIC..
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
.
..WIN 1 BITCOIN ON EVERY PREMIER LEAGUE MATCHDAY..
████████████████████████████████
████████████▀█▀ ▀█▀█▀███████████
███████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████████
███████████▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████
█████████▀▄ ██▀▄▄▄ ▀ ▄▀█████████
███████▀ ▀█████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████████
███████▀▄████████▀  ▀█ █▐███████
███████ ▀█████████▄█▀▀██ ███████
████████ ███▀██████ ▄ ██ ███████
████████▌▐▀▄ ██████████ ▄███████
█████████▄██▌▐█████▀██ █████████
████████████▄▀▀▀▀▀▄ ▀▄██████████
████████████████████████████████
.
.JOIN US - IT'S FREE! .
darosior
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 241
Merit: 349



View Profile WWW
March 23, 2019, 02:14:22 PM
 #3

If illegal, since when?

(If any readers are curious, here is an example: 8ec3e3dd39150798d71c61ffb7cc18ade6f2a2958378e18b7a98eefb709e7322 spent by f21b099d67070a7639d384f30e9b139bab58c27e47368a2d8152f05c14e187b7 which is the smallest tx record)
A script has to be standard or the transaction won't be accepted, this check is done with the isStandard() boolean function which will return false if the Solver function returns `TX_NONSTANDARD`.
The `Solver()` function will return `TX_NONSTANDARD` if the script is not P2SH, or valid WITNESS, or OP_RETURN, or P2PK, or P2PKH. None of them can be empty, thus a transaction with an output containing an empty scriptPubkey will be non standard and thus not accepted (/illegal).

EDIT : To answer the question in the title, "nonstandard or illegal ?", this is the same : only standard scripts are legal.

Coding Enthusiast
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 735
Merit: 1355


Novice C♯ Coder


View Profile WWW
March 23, 2019, 03:43:26 PM
Merited by Foxpup (2)
 #4

EDIT : To answer the question in the title, "nonstandard or illegal ?", this is the same : only standard scripts are legal.

Maybe the term "illegal" was an ambiguous term, my English was not helping me find a better word!
By "illegal" I mea whether the transaction containing an empty script would be invalid in a block. As you can see from the transaction I posted in OP it was perfectly possible in 2015 to have such transactions, I want to know if anything has changed.

BTW nonstandard means bitcoin-core nodes automatically reject these transactions and won't relay them. They are not breaking any rules though which is why they can exist in blocks.

Projects List+Suggestion box
Donate 1Q9s
bc1q
|
|
|
FinderOuter(0.1.0)Ann-git
Denovo(0.0.0)Ann-git
|
|
|
BitcoinTransactionTool(0.11.0)Ann-git
WatchOnlyBitcoinWallet(3.1.0)Ann-git
SharpPusher(0.10.0)Ann-git
achow101
Moderator
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 3034


bc1qshxkrpe4arppq89fpzm6c0tpdvx5cfkve2c8kl


View Profile WWW
March 23, 2019, 04:38:45 PM
Merited by Foxpup (3), bones261 (2), ETFbitcoin (1), Coding Enthusiast (1)
 #5

It is non-standard but still valid. No consensus changes have been made regarding empty scriptPubKeys.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!