Team also needs to pass KYC

[TechComputer]

Need to pass kyc is the best way to earn more opportunities because most of the people really wanted to see if the team get kyc ed.

[Danda23]

First of All, blockchain has to do with anonymity, Why then the whole saga of kyc?
If KYC is for customers, why should bounty hunters go through it?  
The role of a bounty hunter is to help the project come to lime light by promoting them through various medium.
At the end ,instead of paying, they bring stringent measures to make bounty hunters to still fail the kyc after submitting their kyc documents.
All to keep the token for themselves  after your hard work.

If the Team is to do kyc, who would check them?
 If only there was a way to stop this kyc saga.

[Endikadija]

Need to pass kyc is the best way to earn more opportunities because most of the people really wanted to see if the team get kyc ed.

Because most of them are always try to avoiding such procedure and we must complain for them to pass KYC procedure to prove if they are a real team that we can trust them all or not and this is a really important thing at all.

[senin]

You have a good point, this is totally the first thing to do in order for the investors and community supporters will support every project.
But sometimes, few investors were being tricked by fake identities. Therefore it is very important that the crypto community will create a solid verification protocol in order to avoid any fake identities that can pass the KYC process.

Though there are plenty of projects also that succeeds even though the team behind the projects are anonymous. I guess, KYC will be necessary only to those projects who have a team that didn't want to be anonymous.

The ICO team cannot be anonymous, because, as it is, investors actually take their word for it, do not see it, and in most cases cannot verify the reality of their project. If they still don’t know to whom they send their money, they will not even have anyone to complain about if they are deceived.
The crypto community also cannot effectively check the ICO teams for possible fraud on their part, since the ICO team in this case reveals only the information that it considers necessary. The most effective in this case will be only the state regulation of ICO activities from the place of their registration. The relevant state bodies will be able to verify the original personal documents of the ICO team and everything related to this activity.

[makerst]

Today, using the KYC process as well when using ICO, many people have already begun to ask themselves. Why KYC is given only by investors. Why the development team today is not handing over KYC, this is not correct.

[colenax]

Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?

it seems like a good idea
but I don't think that will be done by a team from an ico, yes especially those that lead to scams. maybe it really needs regulation as a supervisory body for all ico projects

[sircy]

To be fair, I strongly agree if the Team must pass KYC. So that not only bounty hunters must pass KYC. If the Team can pass KYC and the results can be displayed on the website, of course it will help investors trust the ICO project. Now, growing investor confidence is very difficult so we must always give positive things, so they want to invest.

[levyashin]

It seems like IEO's brought this to the game.

For making an ieo you need to be out there and exchange must verify your team's id. So ieo means no fake team.

[Gab20]

Making kyc mandatory for team might not be the best or most effective way of forestalling scam, but it is just one of the catalysts that would aid it.
I am of the opinion that a regulatory procedure by a registered regulatory body would be the way out of scam.

[swordling143]

Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?

I know where you are coming from, I have joined campaigns that don't give a damn about investors and bounty hunters. However, I don't think there is a way to check a team's validity. They could easily pay third-party verifications just like what you see in most ICO review sites. Your best bet is, as always, is to research all the things they present and pray that the team are not heartless scammers.

[pinoycash]

Making kyc mandatory for team might not be the best or most effective way of forestalling scam, but it is just one of the catalysts that would aid it.
I am of the opinion that a regulatory procedure by a registered regulatory body would be the way out of scam.

Who will be the regulatory body? The Government? Then its counter productive to what cryptocurrency is..

A simple video of the team speaking about the project is enough KYC to know who is behind the keyboard and a video cannot be fake thus making it an effective mode of KYC for Team Members.

[pushups44]

There is no point in bounty hunters who are not investors having to submit sensitive documentation to organizations that might be questionable. Like others have pointed out, it may be best to simply skip past organizations requiring this.

[pushups44]

Making kyc mandatory for team might not be the best or most effective way of forestalling scam, but it is just one of the catalysts that would aid it.
I am of the opinion that a regulatory procedure by a registered regulatory body would be the way out of scam.

Who will be the regulatory body? The Government? Then its counter productive to what cryptocurrency is..

A simple video of the team speaking about the project is enough KYC to know who is behind the keyboard and a video cannot be fake thus making it an effective mode of KYC for Team Members.

There needs to be an independent third party or auditor that can affirm the legitimacy of ICOs. I believe something along these lines has been proposed within the Ethereum ecosystem.

[Lanatsa]

Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?

Rather than KYC, showing themselves as legitimate members would already be enough.Knowing their names, valid social media accounts or any other related things.
Bounty hunters has nothing to do with KYC but sadly these people are included on the list implying the rules for them to get the token.
If you don't like to pass any information then better skip these kind of campaign.

[dobolspeed3]

It is very important for the project team to do KYC. Because it is one of the investors' trust in the project itself. Therefore I often remind, before investing, of course the project TIm must be seen first. Is the team really real. If the team has passed KYC, of course it's very good for the future.

[Akoldi_ibk]

I think this should be a prerequisite for each project because we need to know whom we trust our funds and in case of project failure, if the project team tries to deceive us, we will know who they are and where to find them.

I agree with you. Team KYC should be a prerequisite in this space where scams are at every corner. But I believe that a very serious team that know what they are doing and are ready to put anything in line for the success of their project should not be force to KYC or hide who they are. They should be ready to reveal themselves to their investors.

[BCTS]

I agree that the project team must also confirm their identity, it will protect us from a large number of scams. Today, we can only judge a team if we study their profiles on Linkedin. But we can't really know if it's the same person. After passing KYC, developers will get more confidence from potential users and investors.

[Yemolou]

When team members require hunters to pass the KYC process, it is a must for the team members to pass the KYC as well. I would not risk my information to pass a KYC when the team members do not want to do the same.

[Catmurs]

It seems like IEO's brought this to the game.

For making an ieo you need to be out there and exchange must verify your team's id. So ieo means no fake team.

This is on the one hand of course very good that the market will not be exactly a Scam on the part of the team , but of course disappointing is that anonymity goes away

[Sithara007]

Investors and bounty hunters are mostly required to undergo KYC while the team behind the project itself are not known. And they scam people. I suggest the team should first pass a "KYC" test and publish it on their website before investors and hunters are also made to do same. What do you also think?

LOL.... who is going to check their KYC documents? Nowadays, the ICO market is completely devoid of any regulation and this has triggered an influx of scammers and criminals. If the team itself check the KYC documents of the promoters, then I don't think that it will be of any use. This must be done by an independent and unbiased third party.