Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 08:12:06 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Could USB-C replace USB 3.0 as the 'go-to' PCIe riser connector?  (Read 156 times)
han_LDA (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 29, 2019, 06:39:12 PM
 #1

From my understanding USB-C is very versatile and have many different types of USB specifications. USB 3.1, will use the USB-C design, which I'm reading that can provide 100watts of power. The typical PCIe riser uses anywhere from 50-75watts of power, provided by a 6-pin, SATA connector (for those brave souls that dare), or a 4-pin molex. Now if risers use USB 3.1, does that mean the need for a secondary power cable to risers wouldn't be necessary anymore? Wouldn't that be a lovely thing? Because fuck wire management. Some have a natural knack for it, but definitely not me.
1715026326
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715026326

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715026326
Reply with quote  #2

1715026326
Report to moderator
1715026326
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715026326

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715026326
Reply with quote  #2

1715026326
Report to moderator
1715026326
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715026326

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715026326
Reply with quote  #2

1715026326
Report to moderator
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7856


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
March 29, 2019, 06:50:23 PM
 #2

From my understanding USB-C is very versatile and have many different types of USB specifications. USB 3.1, will use the USB-C design, which I'm reading that can provide 100watts of power. The typical PCIe riser uses anywhere from 50-75watts of power, provided by a 6-pin, SATA connector (for those brave souls that dare), or a 4-pin molex. Now if risers use USB 3.1, does that mean the need for a secondary power cable to risers wouldn't be necessary anymore? Wouldn't that be a lovely thing? Because fuck wire management. Some have a natural knack for it, but definitely not me.

yes it may but  that belongs in alt coin as gpu mining is an alt coin topic.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
han_LDA (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 29, 2019, 07:08:22 PM
 #3

From my understanding USB-C is very versatile and have many different types of USB specifications. USB 3.1, will use the USB-C design, which I'm reading that can provide 100watts of power. The typical PCIe riser uses anywhere from 50-75watts of power, provided by a 6-pin, SATA connector (for those brave souls that dare), or a 4-pin molex. Now if risers use USB 3.1, does that mean the need for a secondary power cable to risers wouldn't be necessary anymore? Wouldn't that be a lovely thing? Because fuck wire management. Some have a natural knack for it, but definitely not me.

yes it may but  that belongs in alt coin as gpu mining is an alt coin topic.

Thank you for correcting the forum section, as you can tell I'm still a pleeb newbie around here.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!