Stake allocation

[Ss4sukE]

I know what you feel like me, so keep it up and don't complain, friend. We have been lucky because it is still below the JR rank. I personally have never complained or been jealous of the comparison of bets / prizes that are different from the ranking above JR. but this did not stop me from continuing to work.

[qtronix]

I think it would be fair to distribute the share according to the quality of the posts. But no one will do it, because it will be necessary to check every post, and bounty managers are too lazy to do it.

[Christinebeauty]

I have no objections to the fact that those with higher ranks should be given much stakes than those with lower ranks but at least the gap shouldn't be so wide . a hero member earning 7 X the reward of a junior member is quite unfair

[xvids]

I think it would be fair to distribute the share according to the quality of the posts. But no one will do it, because it will be necessary to check every post, and bounty managers are too lazy to do it.

Payment base on quality post?
How could they do it if they have so many participants not to mention that they aren't just holding a signature campaign but also a lot of campaigns.
If you think that the payment system is unfair and new users could create a good quality post ,Then don't you think that because of their quality post they would receive merits and could rank up.
After the merit system has been implemented I have seen some low ranks who received so many merits because of their informative post.

[CaVO32]

I think the distribution where higher ranks get greater stakes is fair. This reflects the fact that a higher ranked account is generally considered more influential. Also as it has to have been built up by many posts over many years, it means the poster is an established and influential member of the forum - so they should get more stakes than say someone who has just joined. Higher stakes for higher ranks also goes some way towards addressing multi-accounting and spamming. This is similar to people with more social media followers getting higher stakes for Twitter/Facebook bounties.
The issue of whether merit is fair or not is a different question. It may be imperfect, but it is currently the best solution we have to  solve the issue of people ranking up just by spamming meaningless posts. I myself have been partly lucky (because I got to Full Member before merit came in) and partly unlucky (because this means I'll never become Senior). I do feel for newcomers and those with really low ranks, but until someone comes up with something better, then the merit system is the best we have. It may have its flaws, but it is certainly a sensible and well-thought-out system.

don't have sMerits to send you but you have elaborated your point so well here. maybe this situation will not be permanent. sooner or later, theymos will come up with another idea and we will have another chance to rank up faster. who knows? but at the moment, just contribute whatever we have to further improve the forum. it is not all about ranking up and getting the stake allocation from the bounties. within this forum, we already learned a lot of things and get information that we can't read from other crypto-related websites. trading discussions, mining, new projects and many others are just few things that you will acquire that will help you understand the world of crypto.

[sell my ac_________nt]

I think this distribution system is fair, because a person with a high rank and his signature will notice and pay attention to the project he is promoting.

[Dayan1]

Then push your self to be a better user of this forum. Try to gather information and make post about it. This is a challenge for you, everything was fair. You should do your part, everyone can get merit through their worlks. Try to find yourself which topic you should focus on. Like identifying scam project, something like that. Make a specific goal

[ricardobs]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

As you have said already, this members are of different ranking and you don't expect them to get the same stake even though they have the same workload.

For example, I might love to believe the signature campaign worn by a senior member or hero member then believe that worn by a junior member since a hero member has more experience in the forum than a junior member or even a member rank in the forum, this is why reward will always be different.

[shiming]

I think it is reasonable to assign rewards according to the level of the forum. It can only be said that the distribution is relatively fair and human. Coming to the forum is a learning process. The level is similar to the length of time to come to the forum.

[Sacramentus]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

even if we deliberate on this issue from now till the next 5years, it will not change anything. One point is, no bounty hosts are here to see thisor implement it. Every bounty has its own rules according to the hosts. Also you called them senior members and so the difference is very clear

[semes]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

It is not easy to take merit. Moreover, recently merit holders in the forum even opened the title. This makes it sometimes difficult for accounts to be better located.

But the rating system is very fair. So JR. Member with an account, past the forum and Sr. It wouldn't be right to have the same degree as a member.

[robaya]

I think it is reasonable to assign rewards according to the level of the forum. It can only be said that the distribution is relatively fair and human. Coming to the forum is a learning process. The level is similar to the length of time to come to the forum.

what about those who come with money and immediately buy a high ranking account? it feels unfair when viewed from knowledge and length of study if the reward is given based on rank. but now that happens in this forum like that. the more he develops, the more he will rank his account. and allows getting bigger rewards.

[Thomas-s]

I think it is reasonable to assign rewards according to the level of the forum. It can only be said that the distribution is relatively fair and human. Coming to the forum is a learning process. The level is similar to the length of time to come to the forum.

Well, now getting new ranks is very difficult for those people who are just entering the cryptocurrency industry. And when new users will come, I think it will be very hard for them

[Yoo]

Yes, I think this is only for signature campaigns. You can join Facebook, Twitter and content campaigns. So, your stake allocation will not be determined by your rank.

Yeah, I think it's normal. Actually, that's since I was new to this forum. Yeah, when I was newbie, my stake was also different from the Sr. Members, Hero Members and Legendary. And I think that's normal.

If you want to get the same stake allocation with Legendary, then your rank must be able to reach legendary. 

[beami]

I think it is reasonable to assign rewards according to the level of the forum. It can only be said that the distribution is relatively fair and human. Coming to the forum is a learning process. The level is similar to the length of time to come to the forum.

Well, now getting new ranks is very difficult for those people who are just entering the cryptocurrency industry. And when new users will come, I think it will be very hard for them

Newcomers do seem difficult to be able to increase rankings and this requires more knowledge than expected, and the allocation of the stake will also be adjusted to rank. This is natural and still continues so if migrants want to get a high allocation, they must be able to improve their quality and add merit.

[Thanasis]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

Higher the rank you get the more signature space you will have which means more bold words on signature can be implemented so it is completely normal that higher rank member receives more rewards so if you want to get more stakes then you have no other option than rankig up even though it is hard but not impossible give the effort and you will gain merits.You can get more merits on local boards so try to stick with it as possible.

[Apes]

if you follow the bounty signature it is fair provision according to. if you want a stake that is balanced with all levels of members. You can follow bounty article. youtube. or social media. all depends on your strategy in participating in the bounty. working on bounty articles in my opinion more easier than working on a signature. the stake obtained is also quite appropriate.

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

You're missing the picture here, merit were handed out more in the early days because people didn't really understand what the merit system was all about and those against the system were just offering giveaways to undeserving members all in the sake of pity. Anyone earning merits of recent truely deserve it. You need to understand the world isn't fair you can be a school dropout and except to earn the same wages with a PHD holder. Jnr and snr rank can't earn the same, it makes no sense the only time members of different rank can be giving equal earning opportunity is when their rank range is between snr to legendary and they get paid per post.

[NightMar_1St]

The problem you must actively contribute ideas and give good things to the forum. Shares for rankings to help you try to increase your rank.

[pinoy.bolanon]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

I understand your sentiment, but unluckily for us being a low rank, we only have small percentage of the stakes, compared to the higher ranks, but what we gonna do for now is to make an effort to improve our ranks, you know investors have more trust to higher ranks compared to lower ranks, that is why they are more rewarded than the lower ranks