Stake allocation

[ansarose1]

I think we cannot do to change it and besides the longer you are member here in bitcointalk the higher your rank would be, i think last couple of years the forum rules states that if you are a year in the forum automatically you would become a full member and have to be 100 merits. So its the rule now that the members would earn merits to be able to rank high and have a bigger stakes in the campaigns.

[Ezenwanyi]

I believe in rewarding hardwork.
To get to the rank of full, senior ,hero and even legendary member is a lot of hard work.
It takes much effort to get merit and subsequently rank up.
So if they are getting stakes based on their ranks then it's proper.
If you are not comfortable with it, you then work hard on the forum to rank up and enjoy high stakes with them.

[aioc]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

It's not the post but the visibility of the code on signature campaigner, it should not be equal of course, in fact, those codes from junior members are hardly visible compared to senior or hero members so they are likely to get more click, and awareness.

[Olatunjex]

The stakes depends on the signature space.
The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks. When I was also new to the forum, I also noticed that but I don't know the history of it, probably that's it.

That caused by you need more effort to make or increase your rank from the newbie to the legendary. The history of stake created by the old system of BTT that gave you 14 weekly activity and you need a certain amount of your activity point to make you able to increase your rank. That's why there was a stake allocation based on level.

Mate i agree to some extent that more efforts should put in order to increase rank but at the same time those that came late to the party are the one most affected, you as an example, you have only earned 4 merit apart from the one given to you because you are a legendary just imagine you are newbie when the rule was implemented, you will still be a junior member by now.

[Wildwest]

I think this system is good where every reward is given based on stake not post, if the reward calculation is given based on the post, there will be more spammers growing here

[cytpoway121]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

Senior ranked accounts get to wear the avatar and also have a large viewable and easy to notice signature code
Which attracts readers faster than a junior member signature code

And why worry about the stakes ? Just get the know how of contents and be a part of it too

When it comes to merit; continue making good and educative posts
Merit will definitely follow suit to your account

[jrrsparkles]

I believe in rewarding hardwork.
To get to the rank of full, senior ,hero and even legendary member is a lot of hard work.
It takes much effort to get merit and subsequently rank up.
So if they are getting stakes based on their ranks then it's proper.
If you are not comfortable with it, you then work hard on the forum to rank up and enjoy high stakes with them.

Most of the higher rank members were not ranked up from merit earned,they were given with airdropped merits at the time of merit system implementation and those people after registered here need to rank up through merits and if they did so means they no need to work for these worthless tokens they can get slots on bitcoin paying signature campaigns.

[Aniwura]

One of the joy of being on the forum, is seeing that you are progressing and growing as a member, but it is more fulfilling when you see you are helping people and providing solutions to problem. By so doing, without you relenting, you will continue to increase in rank until you have attained your desired rank.

[Natalim]

This is the privilege a high rank member could get.
They started early and they stay longer, the merit system was new, before an account can rank up based only in activity, but we have a new system that you have to embrace. Moreover, the signature campaign should give bigger stakes for high rank as they can carry big sig which is more visible and attractive.

The solution to this, is try to rank up by collecting merits, you can do that for sure if you make good posts.

[coin-investor]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

You should name who among those merit giver that give merit to a useless post, I agree that it's much harder to rank now I have a lot of friends who have given up because of the rank up system but we should respect the decision of the administrators here.

[toydoll]

I can't tell if this system is fair or not,of course before it was easier to earn rank than it is now.But the decision is made and it just needs to be taken as a fact.Maybe over time, the system will change a little and become easier.If we talk about the rewards/stakes for bounty,you can also participate in social campaigns,you can study the trading of crypto-currencies and also earn well.

[florac9]

The ball is in your court to get more stakes if that's what you referring to,you have to try harder and show more devotions to this forum to get ranked up ,don't worry all you have to do is help the forum with genuine posts and leave the rest.

[raven7886]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

Apart from bounty campaign, this practice has always been in existence, even in the real life organizations, the income gap between the Senior members and junior members will always be high whether a junior member works more or not, so in bounty campaign, they see it as a reward for their labor and also their years of experience in the field because for someone to be a senior member, he must have been very active for a long time, that is why it is good for the junior member too to work hard to carry the flag and enjoy the senior members benefits.

They also started as junior member too and worked hard to become senior member, so I don’t think the gap between both is as a result of favoritism.

[prtty2gal2]

I can't see the relation of it from why advertisers pays higher stake for higher ranks. And my explanation is likely to be the reason why they pay for good for higher ranks, due to the signature space and color, characters that it can provide.

I think that he just believed they are more experienced and already know how to go about creating awareness for their projects more than the junior members since they have been actively participating in the forum with quality contents which they also believe they will get that quality contents from them.

So, instead of us doing comparison, the rank is left opened for anyone who wishes to take up the title in order to get qualified for such treatments high ranked person gets by walking his way through it through the necessary efforts required.  I believe that one day; every junior member too will attain that rank provided they constructively participate in the forum.

[Boombull]

I don't have much knowledge about merit system but I agree with you to some extent on this. Their should be more fairness in allocation of stakes but all the same there is nothing we can do if that's what the team want so far they include the terms and conditions of the campaign to it.

[kawetsriyanto]

The stake allocations will be different depending on who the Bounty Manager is. Some bounty managers have big differences among the members, and some have close differences. However, I personally prefer to choose the allocation with Bitcoin or ETH that we can easily calculate the amount of earning. 

[MakeMoneyBtc]

A person that has a member rank on this account couldn't wear the same signature as a person that has legendary rank and thats because he doesn't have enough space for it. Yes, people with higher ranks usually put in the same amount of work as the ones with lower ranks but their signature are more valuable because they can have a better looking signature and their posts will also get more attention since they have a higher rank.

[BUK2016]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

I have seen any where sMerit are given base on the quantity of one post as you claimed in your submission but it is base the givers discretion as to whether your contribution requires merits and not the way you put.
On the issues of stake allocation in bounty campaign, you should recall that signature code differ base on the rank and that is how it is visible to the prospective clients/customers and is why the allocation of stake should be different according to the rank.

[LbtalkL]

You are right I saw some legendary in signature that are pretty much the same performance with jr. Member I think that is the only campaign ranks matters the rest has equal stakes like translation, blog, etc. That's how it works with the new merit system now lets just help the forum and other members and maybe we can earn some merits to rank up.

[smyslov]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

I don't see any reason about the gap, they are the early bird here and they worked for it, they are very lucky that they have it before the merit implementation, I have seen a lot of accounts that are not ranking for several months when they should have been 1 or two ranks up but that's the new forum rule.