Stake allocation

[cryptowolfsu]

This system is quite fair. Those with higher ranks get more stakes but they have much more past activities on
the forum than a newbie. Their  posts are visible on more places and have higher advertising value. I have no time
to read all the posts in a thread  if there are too  many but I try to read all  the posts from higher ranked members.
I am not saying that those posts always have higher information value just explaining  how it works in my case.

[1714695786]

1714695786

[1714695786]

1714695786

[djuragan]

I think being active in the forum is also something to be praise, and one form of that praise would be from the stake allocation from the bounty campaign.
From that the member of the forum getting their effort in the forum getting paid of based on the effort they had done since the past.

[TomiJerry]

The higher the rank, the higher the requirements, and this is absolutely true. And with the increase in the number of forum participants, we should expect stricter rules for obtaining merit. And this is probably correct, because every third forum member cannot be a real professional.

[OptimusPrime_3]

To me I prefer the staked bounty to a fixed or any other type of rewarding. Look at how B0x is making hunters work for nothing because they have a poor system of rewarding. To the point that many hunters are being rubbed of its reward

[rockethead]

The system with the stakes is not easy to understand at the beginning. And the reasons for this are not immediately obvious. However, it is necessary to conduct
campaigns in this way because otherwise fake users would gain the upper hand. It is so already very difficult a good campaign to handle. But one thing I can still
give you on the way. Signature campaigns look much better than they actually are. So the signature should always be seen as a bonus and not as the main reason for participating in the forum

[pat25]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

First come, first serve. If you are here only by doing bounty campaigns then I would suggest you to leave.
Old members weren´t here for doing bounty campaigns but about talking about cryptocurrencies, but recently forum changed to a work platform where bounty hunters writing  mindless posts.

[Wexnident]

This system is quite fair. Those with higher ranks get more stakes but they have much more past activities on
the forum than a newbie. Their  posts are visible on more places and have higher advertising value. I have no time
to read all the posts in a thread  if there are too  many but I try to read all  the posts from higher ranked members.
I am not saying that those posts always have higher information value just explaining  how it works in my case.

The overall system for stake allocation is fair, just like in company position the new one will get a lower wage than those who are old in company, it is the wage increment I guess. I don't have any problems with stake allocation since it is stated at first, if you don't want their allocation system then don't apply for it.

[Ains_sama]

it's true with everything you say, that getting a rating increase is very difficult now, so I feel the participants of the bitcointalk will decrease.

[BitcoinPanther]

I do not know much about merit system. But I agree with you to some extent on this point. Stake allocations should be fair I think. But it is based on the terms and condition set by a project. I have also seen many projects allocating stakes not much far in volumes between all members. But one thing is true that at present, gaining merits are very much hard for newbies.

Read above your comment.  Signature participants are paid on the space they have on signature.  That is why it is called signature campaign.  It is the same as the number of follower in twitter or the number of views on an article campaign and same goes to facebook friends and followers in a facebook campaign.  More followers, viewers = more stake.  If you still don't get it.. I do not know how to explain it.

This greatly explain it just so you do not have to browse up

The stakes depends on the signature space.
The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks.

@OP kindly check these :

In the previous system a member must meet the ff and spend the no. of days to acquire it.:

30 activities equivalent  to be a jr. member (at least 30 days)
60 activities to be a member (at least 60 days)
120 activities to be a full member (at least 120 days)
240 activities to be a Sr. member (at least 240 days)
480 activities to be a Hero Member (at least 480  days)
and from 820 if  activities I am not mistaken, you have a random chance to be a legendary Member,

assuming the member is active daily, he have to wait more than a  year to be a hero member

See the difference now? and the new system made it even harder since member need to meet 2 requirement, activities and merit.

to be able to get that amount of space on the signature campaign, higher ranks need to meet these stuff, so why would a jr. member stakes be equal to higher member's stakes?

[Leonardo7]

Variance in Stakes allocation between members of different cadres is okay and helps keep the community in a quality mode and a kind of reward for years of dedication and quality post. As per the merit system, there are rules guiding it and sometimes quality post go unnoticed since the merit sources are humans too with a lot of works on their desk.

[Malam90]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

This is so simple calculation but you have to understand that rank has a great value and it is one of the best way to promote a project. When Full Member, Senior Member, Hero Member and Legendary promote a project with signature and avatar, it shows this project has a potentiality in future. Investors will become eager to see but Jr Member and Member have less space and less valuable for signature because at first we see avatar and then siganture but Jr.Members and Members don't have avatar. That's why high rank gives high stakes. Obviously merits are now a system where one gets it from his/her near and dear person except few.

[Mommynigabby]

The stakes depends on the signature space.
The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks. When I was also new to the forum, I also noticed that but I don't know the history of it, probably that's it.

That caused by you need more effort to make or increase your rank from the newbie to the legendary. The history of stake created by the old system of BTT that gave you 14 weekly activity and you need a certain amount of your activity point to make you able to increase your rank. That's why there was a stake allocation based on level.

The thing you mentioned is about the old activity and rank upgrade.I can't see the relation of it from why advertisers pays higher stake for higher ranks. And my explanation is likely to be the reason why they pay for good for higher ranks, due to the signature space and color, characters that it can provide.

I agree with you. I've been here 1 year before i became active and I have to be honest -- it's because of bounty ,though I never joined any spammer campaign be it here or in social media, not that it matter but just saying . Unfortunately, when we had the merit system I was only on member level. Been doing bounty for 1 year now and looking back, I realized that I didn't have any successful ( significant reward ) Signature campaign. Maybe, on the back of my mind is the same reason what the author posted and i felt like i'm ONLY going to get that LITTLE chunk anyway. All Sig Campaigns I've seen would require the same amount of posts for all types of levels and yet there is a very big differences with the rewards. It's a bitter truth to swallow, i just need to suck it up I guess.

[Yemolou]

Those accounts are more valuable on this forum and thats why they get the most stakes. It is extremely hard to get smerits and there are only few legendary members on this forum and much more jr. members or regular members.

[suzanne5223]

More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.

So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.

You seems not to understand how payment structure or stake allocation works on this forum because people are paid per their ranking and you cant except CM to pay Junior member and higher ranking the same amount.

Meanwhile,there are some certain which people barely get merit even when post quality post and there are some certain which people will get merited for making quality post. But just have to ask just like someone does the other day.

[FelippeHeinz]

I still can not see positively the current merits system. On the other hand this add value '$$$' to merits.

[jonas5222000]

For my own opinion this is fair because they are really hardworking to get their rank even if im on them i really want to get big stakes because my rank was high just only think their sacrifice.

[TomArayaSlaya]

Merits are really hard to come by and the truth is you need to work extra hard to earn merit Positive contribution to the forum might earn you merit but your constant effort to move the forum forward should be what you are after first..Just keep giving your best

[the rise]

Of course his appearance is very different between Jr. and Senior or heroes because the appearance of high-ranking signatures is more attractive to investors to see and can be of particular concern compared to the ranking signatures below that you should know before you complain about all these Merits of course, all the luck of each member if you want a Merits, of course there are ways you have to do it, please try.

[aokiji06]

It is very reasonable that the name of a beginner must start from the bottom, the purpose of all of that is to make enthusiasm for beginner members. they are seniors, heroes and legendaries indeed deserve a bigger part because their abilities are already feasible, so for beginners like us we really have to learn more and learn not only be jealous to pursue profits, add insight and networks are very necessary to join this forum

[starblocks]

Forum ranking is the most practical way for signature campaign managers to distribute stakes because content can vary greatly between each individual member and it would be far too difficult to allocate stakes based entirely on post quality however, some campaigns do require higher standards e.g. minimum post length, improved quality and consistency