THE FASTEST MINER IN THE WORLD!!!

[flamehowk]

THE FASTEST MINER IN THE WORLD

Hello. I create a branch on the topic of our development.

We managed to develop the fastest kernel for Bitcoin hashing in the world.
Comparative characteristics of our miner with miners of competitors can be found in the following table:



Details of the device of our innovative architecture for miners Bitcoin can be viewed in the next video.



If you do not understand what the video is about, first look at a small educational program on the basic concepts of microelectronics: "chip", "crystal", "core", "transistor" and "architecture".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56m_zk7NNNU

Project website: http://www.venus.company/

English speaking group on telegram: https://t.me/Venus_Mine_ENG

[1715026698]

1715026698

[1715026698]

1715026698

[1715026698]

1715026698

[1715026698]

1715026698

[1715026698]

1715026698

[1715026698]

1715026698

[Steamtyme]

I can't be sure I  only took a quick glance. It appears right now you do not have a miner, so I'm not sure how you can compare it to other miners.

Next is this a round about way to promote your ICO?

Reported to be moved.

[flamehowk]

how you can compare it to other miners.

We have ready kernel code. Based on it, we can make a technical calculation that will show an approximate performance of + - 50% of the real.

Next is this a round about way to promote your ICO?

This thread is not about ICO.

I want to clarify that the performance losses from the calculation may be due to the fact that on the first chip samples we may not be allowed to perform our circuit with all levels of optimization. On the second generation of chips, we will already have money that will allow them to be realized independently. But the first batch will depend on the developers who will design the topology of our chips on the outsorce.
Increased productivity is possible if we are allowed to carry out a manual optimization of the topology of the crystal.
Since these are important points, they can give a significant difference in real performance, from the technical calculation that we have done. Therefore, we immediately honestly warn about everything.
BUT, the promising possibilities of our architecture are very high.

[Steamtyme]

Well that's no way to announce hardware or throw out claims of being the best. You do realise that + or - 50% is a ridiculous statement, when talking about equipment performance.

Also the requirement that someone has to buy your tokens for the priviledge of buying this vaporware is laughable. Couldn't resist poking around a little more.

[flamehowk]

Well that's no way to announce hardware or throw out claims of being the best.

Is this forum not created to inform the community about new technologies in the field of bitcoin? Or do you see a lot of branches here in which Bitmain and Bitfury discuss their equipment? And our project, moreover, is open sorce.

You do realise that + or - 50% is a ridiculous statement

Why? Our miner will be 6-8 times faster than the miners of competitors. Even if we lose the estimated performance of -50%, it will still be 3-4 times faster. What's so ridiculous?

Also the requirement that someone has to buy your tokens for the priviledge of buying this vaporware is laughable.

We do not sell any programs, you are mistaken. We offer tokens as a means of controlling prepayment, which is made by the buyer. It's about buying miners.

You can laugh. We are glad that you laugh. But this is our project and we have the right to establish those rules that we consider necessary. If you do not understand their meaning, it does not mean that they are bad.

[Foofighter]

You have no working product, there are and were a lot of "theoretical" and "concept" machines around but most of it never materialised.
This sub forum is for real products.

[flamehowk]

You have no working product, there are and were a lot of "theoretical" and "concept" machines around but most of it never materialised.
This sub forum is for real products.

But our project is not a “theoretical” or “conceptual” machine. We worked on it for 2 years. We have a ready-made architecture and a rigorous rationale for its prospects. The architecture is outlined in the form of open source Verilog.

I am sorry that you are not interested. We do not force you to read this thread. We opened this thread for those who are interested in this topic. And if you want, you can wait for the finished product.

If the forum administration decides that we are breaking the forum rules - let it be deleted.

[vincl]

i bet 1 BTV SV that its a complete scam cmon...no-name claims to be better than bitmain.. MEGALOL

[fccs]

My machine is best guys.  I have a theory/concept about making a 80,000th miner out of a fridge, it uses 100 watts and runs on cold fusion.  MY MINER IS DA BEST GUYS I WIN.  Who wants to get in the preorder line for delivery May 2057?

[flamehowk]

I'm glad everyone has a lot of fun. But if you had studied the materials a little, you would know that I was not only not nameless, but also a public figure, a former political prisoner, and I’m not hiding from anyone. On our site posted my photos with documents. On my YouTube channel there are my videos, in which I am in full growth and also show my documents. Therefore, the reasons for your sarcasm have no reason.

addition
Any specialist can check my words. All information is laid out publicly, including code that can be subjected to independent testing. It is very easy to calculate performance - any specialist can do the same. As for the timing, then 8-10 months is needed for the production of the chip and the creation of a prototype on its base, as well as its tests + time for insurance. For 2 months nobody will do it for you. After the prototype is ready, it will take another half a year to make the first batch of serial miners. This is the standard time for the manufacture of such products in the industry. This can also be confirmed to you by any specialist.
As for Bitmain, as you can see from the comparison table, the new Bitfury miners (by the way, the teams that are our countrymen from Ukraine) are more productive than the Bitmain miners.

[thehairymob]

Until you have a completed miner for sale you sound like another Butterfly labs at best.

[flamehowk]

I do not know what laboratories you are talking about. I have already said - our project OpenSorce and OpenHardware. Code published. ANY CAN CHECK !!!

[mgoz]

I'm all in. How many tokens do I need to buy to secure 5 miners?

[sarcheer]

Have you manufactured any chips? Is there anything physical that you can use to prove your claims?

[philipma1957]

Ah let us not rip the guy.

Hey op this is a speculation thread at best.

Not a hardware thread.

Hardware = hardware  = a physical item that is real and can actually be touched .


Everyone is tired of  new postings about hardware when there is not hardware to be tested demo'd touch etc.

I asked for mods to move it to speculation since it is not hardware it does not exist.

As for +- 50%   64 th and 1800 watts

could turn into 32th and 1800 watts     = 56 watts a th

the current s15 is 28th and 1600 watts = 57 watts a th

[flamehowk]

I'm all in. How many tokens do I need to buy to secure 5 miners?

We plan to produce 3 types of miners. In each miner there will be n standard boards (this is necessary for standardization and economy). The standard board is 64 chips on board. The estimated performance of each chip is about 400 GH / s. In this way:
1) Home miner = 1 board (64 * 400 = 25.6 TH / s) + power supply + network card = $ 400
2) Business miner = 4 boards (116 TH / s) + power supply + network card = $ 1200
3) Industrial miner = 16 boards (464 TH / s) + power supply + stabilizer + network card = $ 4500

1 Venus_ICO_Token token is equivalent to 1 USD. Therefore, to acquire 5 miners of a business class, you need 1200 * 5 = 6000 tokens.
Now PreICO. Tokens have a 50% discount. Therefore you need to invest 6000 tokens / 2 = $ 3000.

Have you manufactured any chips? Is there anything physical that you can use to prove your claims?

Making chips is expensive. Test chips for the miner's prototype are made using MPW (Multi Project Wafer) technology. Ordering such chips costs over $ 100,000. Their production takes 3-4 months + time to create the topology and waiting for the next shuttle launch. Right now we announced PreICO to raise $ 200,000 to create a prototype.

For proof, our code is submitted to one of the companies that makes the chip topology on the outsorce. We are negotiating with them to test our code for us. This testing is done in order to assess the future performance of new systems. Such testing gives calculation accuracy up to + -10%. But it takes a long time, so at the moment we have no results of it.

As soon as we have the latest information, we will immediately post it on public display.

[philipma1957]

Ah let us not rip the guy.

Hey op this is a speculation thread at best.

Not a hardware thread.

Hardware = hardware  = a physical item that is real and can actually be touched .


Everyone is tired of  new postings about hardware when there is not hardware to be tested demo'd touch etc.

I asked for mods to move it to speculation since it is not hardware it does not exist.

As for +- 50%   64 th and 1800 watts

could turn into 32th and 1800 watts     = 56 watts a th

the current s15 is 28th and 1600 watts = 57 watts a th

I don't quote myself much  but the new s17 comes out soon and should be a lot better then the s9 you used.

you should have used the s15 not the s9   and as i show you don't look that good compared to the s15.

if the +-50%  turns out to be -50% your gear is not better then an s15.

Besides you don't have a physical product this is not a hardware item at best it is a speculation thread.

[flamehowk]

Ah let us not rip the guy.

Hey op this is a speculation thread at best.

Not a hardware thread.

Hardware = hardware  = a physical item that is real and can actually be touched .


Everyone is tired of  new postings about hardware when there is not hardware to be tested demo'd touch etc.

I asked for mods to move it to speculation since it is not hardware it does not exist.

We report not about the device, but about the new technology. About its development. You say you're tired of the messages. Then tell me - what have you personally developed? Have you developed such a miner that will not be an empty message? You were able to do it alone, without attracting any funds from the outside?
We spent 2 years developing this technology, and you spent 2 minutes reading the post and have already concluded that we are speculators ...

I don't quote myself much  but the new s17 comes out soon and should be a lot better then the s9 you used.

you should have used the s15 not the s9   and as i show you don't look that good compared to the s15.

You inattentively looked at the table. The table shows the comparison with S15.
And the S17 will not be much better than the S15. Because it is the same architecture. And our architecture is innovative, not a single classical architecture can outrun it.

[philipma1957]

You inattentively looked at the table. The table shows the comparison with S15.
And the S17 will not be much better than the S15. Because it is the same architecture. And our architecture is innovative, not a single classical architecture can outrun it.

you are correct I did misread your chart.

you claim 64.75 th per kwatt

and that the unit does 1800 watts

so that it is a 116 th  using only 1800 watts

well that is a nice unit that still is not hardware

BTW to all if this guy has this all worked out why does he offer it to us?

He simply would call up Steve of canaan and cut a deal with them  canaan would then have the best units in the world.

why don't you pm steve here is his forum profile

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=987609

you would be perfect with his company if you are really onto something.

but until you have gear don't post here in hardware.

146UJM5kgzLVUV23CXCf33KQKHckoX1gx3

[flamehowk]

I did it.
Here is the text:

"Hello, Mr. Steven Mosher.
I was given a link to your profile and offered to write you a letter.
My name is Vitaly Monastyrsky and I am an inventor from Ukraine. I developed the innovative architecture of ASIC chips for Bitcoin miners. I made OpenSource and OpenHardware a project, laid out the kernel code, and also made a film in which I described in detail how my architecture works. I also made a technical calculation of its possible performance. But still nobody believes me.
Tell me, please - could you evaluate my project? If you are an expert in the field of devices for mining, it will take you no more than 25 minutes, which are necessary in order to view the presentation video. Everything is very simple there.
Here is his link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HayrYFW0b28&t=1211s

I sincerely apologize for the trouble. Thank you in advance for your time.

Respectfully,
Vitaly Monastyrsky.
VenusMINE project."

Thanks for the link.