User got voted into DT1 by sockpuppets

[suchmoon]

marlboroza requested theymos put him on the blacklist. Also, marlborozo doesn't have a custom trust list. Quite frankly I don't know what you think you caught a whiff of. 

Quicksy's twisting everything into a shit pretzel as usual. marlboroza is doing fine as a DT2 member, doesn't seem too frazzled by the evil DT1 members not heeding his request.

[Quickseller]

can you investigate alts voting for lauda now to be fair ?

Investigations usually begin with some sort of evidence or at least a list of suspects. Do you have any?

There is one person on lauda trust list that theymos blacklisted from DT1. I am not sure if his DT votes were also blacklisted and it would be difficult to test, it is possible his trust list is setup so that it won’t matter.

The person claims to have requested to be blacklisted and opened a thread requesting to be removed from everyone’s trust list but there was seemingly close to zero effort put into this actually getting done.

edit: He asked for everyone to not ask any questions, but he was asked a few, but he did not answer anything meaningful.

marlboroza requested theymos put him on the blacklist. Also, marlborozo doesn't have a custom trust list. Quite frankly I don't know what you think you caught a whiff of. 

Trust list for: marlboroza (Trust: 43: -0 / +7) (738 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-04-06_Sat_20.17h)
Back to index

marlboroza Trusts:
-

marlboroza Distrusts:
-

Lauda has marlboroza on his trust list. Also, as of Feb 12, marlboroza had many people on his trust list.

I would point out that marlboroza says he asked to be blacklisted from DT1, he has not given any details regarding the circumstances as to why he asked to be blacklisted, he asked to be removed from DT publicly, however he has put very little effort into getting this done (very near to zero effort), and he still leaves trust sometimes.

marlboroza Trusts:
1. dooglus (125 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. qwk (750 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Vod (973 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. SaltySpitoon (452 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Foxpup (312 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. philipma1957 (510 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. KWH (33 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. ibminer (326 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. TMAN (864 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. Lauda (803 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. NLNico (201 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. hilariousandco (441 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. EcuaMobi (229 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. cryptodevil (95 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. suchmoon (1570 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. owlcatz (157 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. sapta (150 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. tmfp (233 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. yahoo62278 (404 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. xandry (83 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. RHavar (205 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. LoyceV (1848 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. actmyname (411 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. The Pharmacist (1426 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. DarkStar_ (588 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. Lutpin (768 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
27. SFR10 (189 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
28. Hhampuz (644 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
29. xtraelv (977 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
30. o_e_l_e_o (1191 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
31. Alex_Sr (517 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
32. ICOEthics (383 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)

marlboroza Distrusts:
1. ~TECSHARE (165 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~OgNasty (559 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~Anduck (28 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. ~TradeFortress 🏕 (23 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~notaek (9 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~peloso (65 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. ~cryptohunter (101 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. ~jeremypwr (154 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. ~allyouracid (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. ~grtthegreat (18 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. ~Thule (23 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. ~Quickseller (284 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. ~zazarb (481 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. ~MaoChao (27 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. ~WhiteManWhite (54 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. ~TheFuzzStone (209 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. ~xenon131 (180 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. ~Goran_ (353 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. ~Tramirostronix (75 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. ~mdayonliner (338 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. ~S_Therapist (260 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)

[o_e_l_e_o]

Lauda has marlboroza on his trust list. Also, as of Feb 12, marlboroza had many people on his trust list.

So?

I would point out that marlboroza says he asked to be blacklisted from DT1, he has not given any details regarding the circumstances as to why he asked to be blacklisted

He was blacklisted. He disappeared from DT1 on the same day he made the original thread, and not when DT1 was next recalculated 3 weeks later. Therefore, theymos must have manually removed him. He is also not required, in any way shape or form, to explain his decision to anyone.

and he still leaves trust sometimes.

Not wanting to be part of DT has nothing to do with leaving trust ratings, otherwise no one except DT members would ever leave trust ratings.

[Quickseller]

Lauda has marlboroza on his trust list. Also, as of Feb 12, marlboroza had many people on his trust list.

So?

This conflicts with the insulation that he does not want to be on DT1, nor DT2 anymore.

I would point out that marlboroza says he asked to be blacklisted from DT1, he has not given any details regarding the circumstances as to why he asked to be blacklisted

He was blacklisted. He disappeared from DT1 on the same day he made the original thread, and not when DT1 was next recalculated 3 weeks later. Therefore, theymos must have manually removed him.

There is no question that he was blacklisted. The question surrounds the circumstances surrounding him getting blacklisted.

He is also not required, in any way shape or form, to explain his decision to anyone.

I agree, no questions regarding suspicious activity should be allowed to be asked of him. /s

and he still leaves trust sometimes.

Not wanting to be part of DT has nothing to do with leaving trust ratings, otherwise no one except DT members would ever leave trust ratings.

Right  So you are telling me you think it is completely normal behavior for someone to *ask* to be removed from everyone's trust list, and continue sending trust ratings? These two activities conflict with eachother; there is no argument against this. 

[LoyceV]

Lauda has marlboroza on his trust list. Also, as of Feb 12, marlboroza had many people on his trust list.

So?

This conflicts with the insulation that he does not want to be on DT1, nor DT2 anymore.

I think you misinterpreted the date:

Reserved for historic overview (the last entry is most recent)
~
4a. http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-09_Sat_06.11h
4b. http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-09_Sat_21.23h (improved layout)
4c. http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-12_Tue_19.34h (highlighting weekly Trust list changes)
~
Strike out: I'll remove redundant data soon, this might cause dead links from BBCode.

Feb 12, I made some improvements to my Trust list viewer, and updated week 4. However, the data dump I used was from Saturday morning before that (Feb 9).

Marlboroza created his topic on Feb 12:

Add this to your trust list:

~marlboroza

I have no reason to believe marlboroza had not emptied his trust list yet, when he created that topic.

[o_e_l_e_o]

This conflicts with the insulation that he does not want to be on DT1, nor DT2 anymore.

Except his trust list was wiped at most 3 hours after starting the thread asking to be excluded: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5108783.msg49699653#msg49699653. It was probably wiped before that though, since Loyce's data would have been 3 days old by that point.

I agree, no questions regarding suspicious activity should be allowed to be asked of him. /s

How is asking to be removed from DT suspicious? If he was asking to be added to DT, you may have a point.

So you are telling me you think it is completely normal behavior for someone to *ask* to be removed from everyone's trust list, and continue sending trust ratings? These two activities conflict with eachother; there is no argument against this.

Because he could be sending ratings for his own benefit, or he is perfectly happy for his ratings to appear as untrusted to everyone else, you know, just the same as the thousands of forum members who leave ratings but aren't on DT or anyone else's trust list.

[petahasher]

This is quite questionable. When was this change made? Should not all DT1 users be manually reviewed and not automatically placed into the category?

[suchmoon]

This conflicts with the insulation that he does not want to be on DT1, nor DT2 anymore.

Except his trust list was wiped at most 3 hours after starting the thread asking to be excluded: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5108783.msg49699653#msg49699653. It was probably wiped before that though, since Loyce's data would have been 3 days old by that point.

Not to mention that people who are not in DT are also allowed, encouraged even, to have trust lists.

[Quickseller]

Lauda has marlboroza on his trust list. Also, as of Feb 12, marlboroza had many people on his trust list.

So?

This conflicts with the insulation that he does not want to be on DT1, nor DT2 anymore.

I think you misinterpreted the date:

Reserved for historic overview (the last entry is most recent)
~
4a. http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-09_Sat_06.11h
4b. http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-09_Sat_21.23h (improved layout)
4c. http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-12_Tue_19.34h (highlighting weekly Trust list changes)
~
Strike out: I'll remove redundant data soon, this might cause dead links from BBCode.

Feb 12, I made some improvements to my Trust list viewer, and updated week 4. However, the data dump I used was from Saturday morning before that (Feb 9).

Marlboroza created his topic on Feb 12:

Add this to your trust list:

~marlboroza

I have no reason to believe marlboroza had not emptied his trust list yet, when he created that topic.

I didn’t compare the date of the trust list to the date of his thread. There is a post not long after the thread was opened that shows he has an empty trust list.

I would presume he cleared his trust list prior to opening the thread or very shortly thereafter.

I was trying to point out that he previously had a trust list before he was blacklisted.

This conflicts with the insulation that he does not want to be on DT1, nor DT2 anymore.

Except his trust list was wiped at most 3 hours after starting the thread asking to be excluded: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5108783.msg49699653#msg49699653. It was probably wiped before that though, since Loyce's data would have been 3 days old by that point.

I agree, no questions regarding suspicious activity should be allowed to be asked of him. /s

How is asking to be removed from DT suspicious? If he was asking to be added to DT, you may have a point.

So you are telling me you think it is completely normal behavior for someone to *ask* to be removed from everyone's trust list, and continue sending trust ratings? These two activities conflict with eachother; there is no argument against this.

Because he could be sending ratings for his own benefit, or he is perfectly happy for his ratings to appear as untrusted to everyone else, you know, just the same as the thousands of forum members who leave ratings but aren't on DT or anyone else's trust list.

The suspicious part is that his actions don’t match what he is saying.

He is very much aware that his ratings show up by default but he continues to leave ratings despite saying that he doesn’t want them showing up by default.

When I first saw the thread, I didn’t think his request was genuine, but I wasn’t sure why he was making the request.

[suchmoon]

When I first saw the thread, I didn’t think his request was genuine, but I wasn’t sure why he was making the request.

Yeah but we can be sure that you're trying to make this molehill into a mountain because marlboroza posted not-so-nice things about you recently. You're giving thin-skinned narcissists a bad name. How is this even relevant to the topic of sockpuppets voting for DT1? He doesn't vote nor can be voted for.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

So you are telling me you think it is completely normal behavior for someone to *ask* to be removed from everyone's trust list, and continue sending trust ratings? These two activities conflict with eachother; there is no argument against this. 

Maybe he doesn't want the hassle that comes along with having his red tags (or green ones) carry so much weight.  It certainly can be a pain in the ass when your PM inbox blows up every day with pleas for mercy, excuses, and everything else that goes along with being a DT member.  Ultimately, we don't know why he made the request to be removed, but I don't find anything suspicious about it. 

Given how warped QS's view of things is, it doesn't surprise me he thinks there's something sinister about marlboroza not wanting to be on DT.  And no, marlboroza doesn't have to justify anything to anybody when he hasn't done anything wrong.

Yeah but we can be sure that you're trying to make this molehill into a mountain
<snip>
You're giving thin-skinned narcissists a bad name.

Yep.

[OgNasty]

So you are telling me you think it is completely normal behavior for someone to *ask* to be removed from everyone's trust list, and continue sending trust ratings? These two activities conflict with eachother; there is no argument against this.  

Maybe he doesn't want the hassle that comes along with having his red tags (or green ones) carry so much weight.  

I thought it might have something to do with the realization that he was providing support to those who were promoting scams he claimed to be fighting and him not wanting to be a complete and total hypocrite while maintaining his personal relationships.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49666702#msg49666702

[o_e_l_e_o]

The suspicious part is that his actions don’t match what he is saying.

So what would you have him do instead? Constantly harass everyone with him on their trust list until they remove him?

When I first saw the thread, I didn’t think his request was genuine, but I wasn’t sure why he was making the request.

Perhaps he was fed up of artificial drama being manufactured by some users for personal gain. I can't say I blame him.

[coinlocket$]

Yeah, please do.

So starting with ignoring low rank and banned accounts

Merit received by gunhell16 from January 24, 2018 until April 05, 2019 (source)

Tue Apr 10 17:53:06 2018: 3 from hackzang12 Banned! (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Tue Apr 10 17:50:43 2018: 4 from Viscera (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Tue Apr 10 17:04:16 2018: 4 from Dwey Banned! (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Tue Apr 10 17:02:31 2018: 6 from Dwey Banned! (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Mon Apr  2 17:19:20 2018: 2 from tokeweed (Trust list) (history) for Re: A Poll on Blockchain.info on What You Use it For. The Next20 Earn 2 Merits Each!
Mon Apr  2 10:56:11 2018: 5 from martina14 (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Mon Apr  2 10:19:43 2018: 5 from Cassy14 (history) for Re: Philippines to accept eth trading @coins.ph
Wed Feb 28 13:07:43 2018: 4 from coinstalker23 Banned! (history) for Re: [ANN][ICO] EARTH TOKEN - Participate in the $120 trillion natural asset market
Wed Feb 28 12:51:52 2018: 5 from Risktaker31 (history) for Re: [ANN][ICO] EARTH TOKEN - Participate in the $120 trillion natural asset market
Sun Feb 25 16:59:23 2018: 5 from lance04 Banned! (history) for Re: [ANN][ICO] EARTH TOKEN - Participate in the $120 trillion natural asset market
Sun Feb 25 16:55:51 2018: 5 from ace4549 Banned! (history) for Re: [ANN][ICO] EARTH TOKEN - Participate in the $120 trillion natural asset market
Sun Feb 25 16:03:05 2018: 10 from santino11 Banned! (history) for Re: [ANN][ICO] EARTH TOKEN - Participate in the $120 trillion natural asset market
Sun Feb 25 16:01:05 2018: 5 from kram31 (history) for Re: why hackers can get into Myetherwallet
Sun Feb 25 15:43:02 2018: 10 from cherryganda (history) for Re: Why People Can Not Believe Bitcoin
Fri Feb 23 13:19:06 2018: 1 from Gibreil (history) for Re: Cryptocurrency Exchanges!
Fri Feb 23 13:11:54 2018: 2 from Wallflower28 (history) for Re: How does a Bitcoin have any value?
Thu Feb 22 12:46:51 2018: 15 from anjho.ace (history) for Re: &#127775;&#127775;&#128640;[BOUNTY][ICO]ATLANT REAL ESTATE PLATFORM[OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN]&#128640;&#127775;&#127775;
Thu Feb 22 12:42:13 2018: 4 from yrrehc16 Banned! (history) for Re: &#127775;&#127775;&#128640;[BOUNTY][ICO]ATLANT REAL ESTATE PLATFORM[OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN]&#128640;&#127775;&#127775;
Thu Feb 22 12:41:34 2018: 16 from wdnj (history) for Re: &#127775;&#127775;&#128640;[BOUNTY][ICO]ATLANT REAL ESTATE PLATFORM[OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN]&#128640;&#127775;&#127775;
Thu Feb 22 12:28:26 2018: 10 from santiPOGI (history) for Re: why hackers can get into Myetherwallet
Tue Feb 20 17:36:49 2018: 10 from n691309 Banned! (history) for Re: why hackers can get into Myetherwallet
Tue Feb 20 17:35:43 2018: 10 from santino11 Banned! (history) for Re: why hackers can get into Myetherwallet
Thu Feb 15 18:03:57 2018: 4 from cherryganda (history) for Re: do you think i should sell my coins to cut my losses?
Thu Jan 25 14:18:44 2018: 5 from ivanst776 Banned! (history) for LENDING? Why dont we turn it 180 degrees!

5 Accounts connected
 
   cherryganda    
   santiPOGI    
   wdnj    
   anjho.ace    
   martina14    


Proof:

We have a good transaction here
https://etherscan.io/address/0x8950ea1d18b383bb86b24e72c5d97a8e59c43cdc#tokentxns



And here to link the final account

https://etherscan.io/token/0xfa2632a88bd0c11535a38f98a98db8251ccbaa9e?a=0x99c24521433b2316b973009f1bbcf281f96003db



Related Addresses:

Code:

0xc6C16064C5d5be91d06aD9a5F29dE0b898b52484 
0xCC95096A0F4BAFF51723058Abfb67E50Ecb45B37 
0xAbdC34a85485619A1E686C816C179bB6440d29d0 
0x99c24521433b2316B973009f1BbCF281f96003dB 
0x19657b9f9F3614D0289a1cdF52867019a8dE029C 

Miscellaneous:

_________________________________________	_____________________	________________________________________________	___________________
BTC	ACCOUNTlink	BTC on forum	ARCHIVE
0xc6C16064C5d5be91d06aD9a5F29dE0b898b52484	cherryganda	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1108107	http://archive.fo/vzMOM
0xCC95096A0F4BAFF51723058Abfb67E50Ecb45B37	santiPOGI	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1107098	http://archive.fo/FgsZn
0xAbdC34a85485619A1E686C816C179bB6440d29d0	wdnj	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=412953	http://archive.fo/4WrZE
0x99c24521433b2316B973009f1BbCF281f96003dB	anjho.ace	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1197849	http://archive.fo/IHa5O
0x19657b9f9F3614D0289a1cdF52867019a8dE029C	martina14	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169245	http://archive.fo/PfSek

What does it mean? They probably know each other and more likely those are full members alt for gunhell. Others account are probably alts too.
Will look more tomorrow, bed time.

[Quickseller]

How is this even relevant to the topic of sockpuppets voting for DT1? He doesn't vote nor can be voted for.

I don't think you are this blind and are playing dumb.

As of immidiately prior to him being blacklisted from DT1, he was voting for others in his trust list to be on DT1.

So you are telling me you think it is completely normal behavior for someone to *ask* to be removed from everyone's trust list, and continue sending trust ratings? These two activities conflict with eachother; there is no argument against this. 

Maybe he doesn't want the hassle that comes along with having his red tags (or green ones) carry so much weight.  It certainly can be a pain in the ass when your PM inbox blows up every day with pleas for mercy, excuses, and everything else that goes along with being a DT member.  Ultimately, we don't know why he made the request to be removed, but I don't find anything suspicious about it. 

The thing is that he does not appear to actually want to be off DT. He has gained a more solid footing into DT2 than he was before he opened his thread. He appears to have put in a "show" effort into "trying" to get removed from DT2, and is not serious about getting removed.

I don't think marlboroza, what I believe amounts to pretending to want to get off DT2 is suspicious on its own, but he was in fact blacklisted from being on DT1, and was removed from DT1 immidiately.

Based on the below two facts, I believe marlboroza was forced off DT1, and was forced into making a public attempt of getting removed from DT2:

• Was actually blacklisted from DT1
• Appears to be pretending to want to get off DT2

The suspicious part is that his actions don’t match what he is saying.

So what would you have him do instead? Constantly harass everyone with him on their trust list until they remove him?

It is not normal behavior for someone to not honor this type of request if they believe it is legitimate. It appears those who still have marlboroza do not believe he is making a serious request, and marlboroza has not done anything to correct this, assuming he actually wants off everyone's trust lists (as discussed above, I do not believe this). A good first step to trying to get someone to remove you from their trust list would include sending a personal message asking to be removed from their trust list, and to follow up if they do not comply.

[nutildah]

I don't think marlboroza, what I believe amounts to pretending to want to get off DT2 is suspicious on its own, but he was in fact blacklisted from being on DT1, and was removed from DT1 immidiately.

This is a fact? Maybe I missed something, but could you provide your source?

It is not normal behavior for someone to not honor this type of request if they believe it is legitimate. It appears those who still have marlboroza do not believe he is making a serious request, and marlboroza has not done anything to correct this, assuming he actually wants off everyone's trust lists (as discussed above, I do not believe this). A good first step to trying to get someone to remove you from their trust list would include sending a personal message asking to be removed from their trust list, and to follow up if they do not comply.

What's far more likely is he was just sick of the petty drama of DT politics and wants to take a breather from it.

[Quickseller]

I don't think marlboroza, what I believe amounts to pretending to want to get off DT2 is suspicious on its own, but he was in fact blacklisted from being on DT1, and was removed from DT1 immidiately.

This is a fact? Maybe I missed something, but could you provide your source?

He has been blacklisted from DT1, see below:

I'm surprised you dropped out instantly, does that mean you can drop from DT1 the moment you don't have 10 users on your trust list anymore?

I don't know, probably not, probably on voting day. Blacklisted on request

You can see he was immidiately removed from DT1:

@theymos

You used to be DT1. I'm surprised you dropped out instantly, does that mean you can drop from DT1 the moment you don't have 10 users on your trust list anymore?

Is this the intended behavior of the system?

I posted why I believe marlboroza is pretending to want to be removed in the post you quoted.

What's far more likely is he was just sick of the petty drama of DT politics and wants to take a breather from it.

It is possible he does not want to participate in DT drama. He opened a thread asking to be removed from DT2 on Feb 11, and within 10 days, by my count, he had left an additional 50 ratings, and in the ~month since he opened his thread, he has left more than 120 ratings.

The above happened when he was very well aware that he is still in DT2.

Based on the above facts, I don't find it to be a reasonable conclusion that he was trying to get removed due to the DT drama.

[o_e_l_e_o]

As of immidiately prior to him being blacklisted from DT1, he was voting for others in his trust list to be on DT1.

And then he stopped voting and removed himself from DT1 at the same time. If he had removed himself from DT1 and continued to vote for others, you may have a point, but he didn't so you don't.

Based on the below two facts, I believe marlboroza was forced off DT1

Unless anyone is constantly scraping the DT1 list (doubtful), there is no way to prove that without theymos.

I also wonder why you would be so keen to invent this nonsense drama to derail the thread away from the issue of sockpuppets voting for DT1 members.

[LoyceV]

Unless anyone is constantly scraping the DT1 list (doubtful)

I like it
Starting now, I'm scraping https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dtview every hour. If/when I get a VPS I'll publish everything, until then, send me a PM if you have a specific request.

[nutildah]

5 Accounts connected
 
   cherryganda    
   santiPOGI    
   wdnj    
   anjho.ace    
   martina14    

Its just funny to me that gunhell16 achieved exactly enough merit to rank up to Sr Member and hasn't earned 1 more since.

I suppose this isn't exactly "bounty cheating" because there's no way to prove for sure that they are all the same person, yet it is highly suspicious that all the bounty tokens appear to be funneling to the same ETH address.

In any case, good work, and in the future we'll be on the lookout for lude Filipino profile names, lol.