Ddmrddmr on DT1

[Joel_Jantsen]

+1. There is no need to be in DT if you don't make trades or tag accounts when needed.

I disagree with that. One doesn't really need to be on a DT because they do trades on bitcointalk. The trust feedback left after successful trades by other traders speaks for them. Such feedback is enough for other members to consider them trustworthy. A suitable DT candidate should be the one that actively contributes to the forum, tags accounts as you said and helps in cleaning the forum off scammers. One can just be here for the trades and not spend enough time to do anything that helps the rest of the community. I don't think we want such members on the DT.

[1715213904]

1715213904

[1715213904]

1715213904

[suchmoon]

+1. There is no need to be in DT if you don't make trades or tag accounts when needed.

It's not like the number of spots in DT2 is limited. It can equally well accommodate those who trade and tag a lot, and those who post a well thought-out rating once in a while.

[TheNewAnon135246]

+1. There is no need to be in DT if you don't make trades or tag accounts when needed.

It's not like the number of spots in DT2 is limited. It can equally well accommodate those who trade and tag a lot, and those who post a well thought-out rating once in a while.

I meant 'DT1', edited my post .

[TheBeardedBaby]

I disagree with the OP, posting feedback have almost nothing to do with begin DT1.
We mix again the Trust with Feedback.
Most important is his trust list and the way he judge whom to trust or distrust ,also being able to include or exclude members and keep an eye on the rest of the DT members, then comes the feedback.

If Ddmr² trusts someone (or a few) who dedicates his time to tag scammers, and this guy is on DT2 because of him then Ddmr² is more valuable then the few feedback he could have done himself.

[khaled0111]

DdmrDdmr is one of the most valuable members on this forum, no doubt about that.
Not being a regular trader doesn't mean you can't spot scammers effectively. Besides, one of DT membres duties is to tag SCAM ICOs, hacked/sold accounts(...) which doesn't require any trading experience.

The only inconvenience here is that he is not that active in tagging scammers.

[Vod]

Note: By the way, a way to upper the requirements a notch could be to take into account the number of people that have merited the person in the DT votes. It’s not exactly the same having earned 10 merits from a single person than from at least 5 different people.  [/i]

This needs a bump!

BPIP already does this - counts the instances of sMerit given, not the sum.

This is one extra layer of protection in case a merit source goes rouge lol

[asche]

rouge lol

rouge or rogue?

Not sure if the pun was intended, but it's a good one nonetheless

Regarding OP, I guess you misunderstood from the beginning what a DT1 is.
There are no obligations attached to being DT.

- You get "elected"
- If your judgement is off you get excluded.

2 simple and unique rules. Apply them to Ddmr and you have your answer.

[TalkStar]

Just on someones activity basis you can't make someones trust graph OP. DdmrDdmr have enough quality to be at DT1 and able to bear DT responsibility IMO. I beleive his contribution to forum is good enough where he didn't commited scam, spam or any illegal activities which can rise question about trust judgement.

Its not important to have so many members in DT list where I think its much necessary how many of them are doing their duties properly.