the new model of fundrising is IEO

[r1s2g3]

I guess actual worth of IEO will be found out after an year, when they will be able to deliver or not.
Only consolation is that they are already in exchange so you can easily liquidate your IEO token.

It is giving false security also that it is listed in exchange so exchange completed the due delligence.

[muratsink]

the BTC market in 2018 is very bad and created a bear market. and that affects the fundraising model (ICO). finally a new alternative fundraising was coming such as STO and new model fundrising can attracted many large investors is the IEO.

We know that ICO can make money quickly because of the public sales model, but the fundrising model is often used by scammers to get money quickly and only for the benefit of the team. even some projects don't care about their projects. so they only create bad coin coins that have no value on the market.
coins from the IEO can be directly traded in the exchange after the sale is complete. but the ICO model must wait a long time to trade after it is listed in the exchange. so I think IEO is reliable and user friendly. how about you all ?
do you see bad results from the IEO?

When ICO is not working anymore, IEO is the new flavor with a twist.  Since IEO offers much greater security to investors due to guaranteed listing when IEO is completed. 

But beware, Some Low rate exchange starts offering IEO for projects without any due diligence so its open new doors for ICO scammers.

yes. we are always be careful of exchanges that suddenly make the IEO model. besides that we also have to be careful of troubled exchanges. such as exchanges that have been hacked or exchanged that have low trade value. it doesn't benefit us very much. a few days ago the cryptopia market was hacked. and suffered a loss of 225 billion. I think we should avoid cryptopia, unless the security service for ctyptopia has been improved.

[Ozero]

the BTC market in 2018 is very bad and created a bear market. and that affects the fundraising model (ICO). finally a new alternative fundraising was coming such as STO and new model fundrising can attracted many large investors is the IEO.

We know that ICO can make money quickly because of the public sales model, but the fundrising model is often used by scammers to get money quickly and only for the benefit of the team. even some projects don't care about their projects. so they only create bad coin coins that have no value on the market.
coins from the IEO can be directly traded in the exchange after the sale is complete. but the ICO model must wait a long time to trade after it is listed in the exchange. so I think IEO is reliable and user friendly. how about you all ?
do you see bad results from the IEO?

The initial offer of coins (ICO), is now experiencing a very strong decline. Partly due to a decrease in activity in the cryptocurrency market, and partly due to the high level of fraud among such ICO projects.
The initial exchange offer (IEO) is a relatively new way of raising funds for projects to issue new tokens, which is different in that fundraising occurs directly through the exchange. Here there is a certain guarantee to avoid fraud in such projects, but the exchanges still cannot fully guarantee this. The exchanges do not have sufficient authority to inspect the fundraising team and therefore I do not think that this fundraising model will take root. Only government regulation of this type of activity can help us avoid fraud in this type of activity.

[TIDOVEE]

Of course, things are expected to be getting better not the other way round. As you have said the IEO will reduce those shitcoin and will run into exchange quick. Is it not better to have that and be sure you are doing deal rightly. The only thing that I suspect it that,they may want to be strict with the use of KYC which will force every to define themselves.

[muratsink]

The new model of fundrising which is IEO to me is just another way of scam in the world of cryptocurrency because the same lower exchanges will still press ahead to IEOs. Remembering the ICO days, many of these platforms will never carryout thorough research about the project they intend to promote rather put their self interest in front, undermining the negative side of the investors if the project fail to succeed. Many of these exchanges then promote some project during ICOs and never be listed on good exchange for one reason or the other.

Personally, IEOs will be of more ICOs by tomorrow; but today they will act well, so, let watch out against tomorrow and see how it will go from here.
Imagining some Exchanges without volume participation in IEOs.

how can the IEO model create fraud? I think IEO is very safe than ICO. in my opinion the IEO is very safe from fraud and is very efficient at creating value in exchange. maybe the IEO is a bad alternative for bounty hunters. because they cannot get free coins from the project. Today's investors are worried to invest in ICO. I think the IEO is a good model for saving investor assets. but in general, we also have to accept the ICO as a fundrising model that can provide greater benefits to all elements than the IEO.

[Red-Apple]

the name or the model of the fundraising doesn't matter at all. it can be called anything but as long as it is the same, the problems exist. the important thing is why these funds (which are sometimes in the millions of dollars) are being raised and what do those people do with the funds they raised?
unfortunately the answer to that question so far is "nothing" because each of these ICOs in the past couple of years have only gotten paid to release a token that has no usages!
now they are repeating the same thing but are calling it IEO!

[Kakmakr]

Initial Exchange Offerings (IEO) are definitely a better option than ICOs, because it is more difficult for scammers to start a scam IEO, because it has to be approved by exchanges. So, this is going to be a safer investment and you will be able to invest in this, directly from your exchange account. 

The Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) projects will also piggy back onto the millions of exchange users out there, without them having to fork out a lot of money on marketing. 

[Saugani]

There have of course been a number of fraudulent ICO’s that have tarnished the token sale reputation and struck fear and uncertainty into would-be investors.

Ok, I think the relationship between exchange and token creators is quite symbiotic. At first glance it would appear the benefits are clearly in favour of the company listing the token but the benefits extend far beyond this.

The huge IEO news is yet another positive move, one that is likely to prove favourable amongst the growing community. With multiple utility facets in development and a live MVP through a community management & development company, the IEO is likely to further enhance development and expose a great project to an even bigger audience. The on boarding process for new clients to provide is also gaining momentum which will likely result in an increased client base and in an increased demand for the community management & development services.

[killat]

I joined the IEO from Cobinhood exchange to buy some simplyBrand (SBA) tokens and everything worked very smoothly.

I see 2 big advantages when using IEO instead of ICO: first, the exchanges verify in detail the projects,  as listing bad products would affect directly their reputation and second, as an investor you don't have to wait for months after ICO finished to have your tokens listed on an Exchange. It would be a third advantage,  too, as you know from the beginning the name of the first exchange your tokens will be traded.

[Viscore]

I don't see bad result with IEO, in fact it gives benefits to investors as their coins will be listed right away.
The bad side only is if the sites will connive with the coin developer and they will allow their project to get listed even without a potential.
Investors has to choose wisely, if you are investing in IEO, you should choose Binance and other reputable exchanges. 

[shamc]

IEO offerings are more trustworthy. Most will enforce heavy kyc rules for the team to avoid scams. An ico offers no such protection hence the continuous scams and bad offerings

[setialovers]

IEO offerings are more trustworthy. Most will enforce heavy kyc rules for the team to avoid scams. An ico offers no such protection hence the continuous scams and bad offerings

For investor, its more safe to invest in IEO because exchanger guarantee will list token or coin in their platform. Many scam ICOs in 2018 and its bad for investor trust. But i think many good ICO with good developers team will survive and reach the target but its need research

[OptimusPrime_3]

the BTC market in 2018 is very bad and created a bear market. and that affects the fundraising model (ICO). finally a new alternative fundraising was coming such as STO and new model fundrising can attracted many large investors is the IEO.

We know that ICO can make money quickly because of the public sales model, but the fundrising model is often used by scammers to get money quickly and only for the benefit of the team. even some projects don't care about their projects. so they only create bad coin coins that have no value on the market.
coins from the IEO can be directly traded in the exchange after the sale is complete. but the ICO model must wait a long time to trade after it is listed in the exchange. so I think IEO is reliable and user friendly. how about you all ?
do you see bad results from the IEO?

as much as I know with the little research I have done about IEO, it's no better than the ICO. My greatest challenge with the IEO is the fact that it's sales finishes in less than 30sec leaving out smaller investors from being part of the offering.

[Rtalk]

Exchanges need to develop a more transparent way for more investors to participate. Without the help of various algorithms .
The advantage of IEO is that the coin after the sale is immediately traded on the top exchange...but if the coin is of no value-its price falls quickly.
In IEO participate mainly only speculators.

[FORK-KNIFE]

Yobit Exchange has been doing IEO coin listings for years, we all know how those turn out after a while.

Nothing new here except a centralized means of not being fucked over from more well known exchanges when a coin "wants" initial funding and tries a dump & run afterwards, Exchange KYC will play a role in coin devs wanting to go that direction and even then arms can be twisted if you know what I mean...

[Herbert2020]

I guess actual worth of IEO will be found out after an year, when they will be able to deliver or not.
Only consolation is that they are already in exchange so you can easily liquidate your IEO token.

It is giving false security also that it is listed in exchange so exchange completed the due delligence.

if history is any indication, anybody in this market who asked to be paid (fundraising included) has never delivered anything. that is why they want to be paid in advance so that they have no obligation of delivering anything anymore and there is nothing the "investors" can do about it.
and being listed on exchanges is going to be their doom because people have faster and easier way of dumping these tokens now while before they had to wait until they got listed and slowly moved their coins there to dump.

[michellee]

I think that scammers is anywhere so when IEOs boom, scammers can still appear, they can do their IEO in small exchanges where dev exchange doesn't care to protect users. However, IEOs have brought a new wind to market.

And maybe the scammers are trying to enter the IEO too because that will be a legit way for them to attract more investor to come back. I hope that the investor could be still careful to invest in IEO and don't invest in that project if the project is not good for them. Always check the project is the only way for us to prevent getting scam by them.

[Thanasis]

Exchanges need to develop a more transparent way for more investors to participate. Without the help of various algorithms .
The advantage of IEO is that the coin after the sale is immediately traded on the top exchange...but if the coin is of no value-its price falls quickly.
In IEO participate mainly only speculators.

Its just new way of advertising so you have to make enough research before the investment on IEOs as well,exchanges will do their advertisement effective to make them famous so everyone investing on these new projects might become victim as well so I am not interested even after these kind of fund raising platforms were created.

[crzybilly]

There is absolutely nothing new is this "model". The only change is that an IEO is at the same time a guarantee that this coin is going to be listed on an exchange, where this IEO takes place. It does not matter how good the coin is, only exchange itself matters.

[mrdeposit]

the BTC market in 2018 is very bad and created a bear market. and that affects the fundraising model (ICO). finally a new alternative fundraising was coming such as STO and new model fundrising can attracted many large investors is the IEO.

We know that ICO can make money quickly because of the public sales model, but the fundrising model is often used by scammers to get money quickly and only for the benefit of the team. even some projects don't care about their projects. so they only create bad coin coins that have no value on the market.
coins from the IEO can be directly traded in the exchange after the sale is complete. but the ICO model must wait a long time to trade after it is listed in the exchange. so I think IEO is reliable and user friendly. how about you all ?
do you see bad results from the IEO?

It depends on hardwork of these exchanges. So, when the sale ends in 1 minute, exchange prepares everything more quickly, thinking that it will be traded with bigger volumes. Big volume means big earnings.