Big Boobies talkinDoubleD (OP)
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
 |
April 11, 2019, 01:36:32 AM
Last edit: June 27, 2019, 02:54:42 PM by Big Boobies talkinDoubleD |
|
closed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the
first distributed timestamping system.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
I know for a fact
Yet your post is completely devoid of any.  |
|
|
|
|
Foxpup
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4354
Merit: 3042
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
|
|
April 11, 2019, 01:51:33 AM |
|
What gives them the right
This does.that guy doesn't even understand shit about bitcoin.
What guy? Is there someone specific you're complaining about? I know for a fact these gambling sig shillers are taking bribe money and doing backdoor deals all the time.
Really? What are they asking? I've often wondered what the going rate for red trust removal is. |
Will pretend to do unspeakable things (while actually eating a taco) for bitcoins: 1K6d1EviQKX3SVKjPYmJGyWBb1avbmCFM4I am not on the scammers' paradise known as Telegram! Do not believe anyone claiming to be me off-forum without a signed message from the above address! Accept no excuses and make no exceptions! |
|
|
EcuaMobi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1469
https://Ecua.Mobi
|
|
April 11, 2019, 01:52:48 AM |
|
I know for a fact these gambling sig shillers are taking bribe money and doing backdoor deals all the time
Post proof so we all know it for a fact and you can be sure they will be out of DT extremely soon. You're not doing any favors to the forum by keeping this information to yourself and just rant instead. Don't be an accomplice. Share the information you have... Or lock this thread if that was just a lie. |
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
April 11, 2019, 02:05:54 AM |
|
I've often wondered what the going rate for red trust removal is.
Don't you try to undercut the market rate. Mobsters gonna fit you with cement shoes. |
|
|
|
|
mikeywith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 6367
be constructive or S.T.F.U
|
|
April 11, 2019, 02:15:39 AM |
|
(Big Boobies talkinDoubleD) i think if you reverse the username you may make more sense.
|
|
|
|
|
jademaxsuy
|
|
April 11, 2019, 02:30:02 AM |
|
DT's were created to prevent the scam or to alert users in this forum. This is why DT were being created to act on the scam threads. If there ain't any of them here then this forum would be flooded with scammers. These DT's are responsible and if you think that it is being abused then that DT user must be reported. There is no better way to promote the forum for its betterment by reporting scammers and to those who abused the DT system.
It would be easy to report if you can show images showing out the said abuse/s. Just stand up if you think that you are right. There is no way you can be left behind if your accusations has a good basis for we have some good users willing to help here.
|
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
|
|
April 11, 2019, 02:30:16 AM |
|
IMO the trust system should go back to how things worked prior to when trust exclusions were introduced. I don't think it should be controversial to say that someone who is behaving in a way that would warrant an exclusion should be removed from DT if they will not correct their behavior (and previous inappropriate ratings). Similarly if someone on DT1 is refusing to remove someone acting inappropriately refuses to remove someone acting inappropriately (after a discussion and a period of time) from DT2, they have no business being on DT1 in the first place.
The practice of having ~zero regulation of the trust system has only lead to massive regulation by a select few who are accountable to no one, and will face no real repercussions for acting in bad faith and/or unfairly.
The above practice is analogous to the government refusing to impose modest regulations on the actions of an oligopoly, which results in the oligopoly imposing many restrictions on what citizens can and cannot do, and acting unfairly in the process. It is nearly impossible to rid the oligopoly of its power, due in large part to high barriers to entry. While on the other hand, if the government were to impose modest regulations unfairly, voters could vote the government out of power.
The resulting drama from the above, does result in a lot of page views however....
|
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
April 11, 2019, 02:47:35 AM |
|
The above practice is analogous to the government refusing to impose modest regulations on the actions of an oligopoly, which results in the oligopoly imposing many restrictions on what citizens can and cannot do, and acting unfairly in the process. It is nearly impossible to rid the oligopoly of its power, due in large part to high barriers to entry. While on the other hand, if the government were to impose modest regulations unfairly, voters could vote the government out of power.
It's not like that at all. What you're proposing would put all decisions into the hands of one individual - theymos, and that doesn't seem to be something he wants. Nor is he elected in any way so if the community doesn't like his decisions - SOL. On the other hand, the current system is based on voting and the community has a lot of influence on how DT is formed. Perhaps you'd have more success if you actually exposed the "massive regulation by a select few who are accountable to no one" using facts and not some cockamamie theories. Simple math shows that this mythical group would need more than "few" of the ~80 DT1 members to have any sort of control. |
|
|
|
|
logfiles
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1653
Top Crypto Casino
|
|
April 11, 2019, 02:55:11 AM |
|
I thought this forum is supposed to be decentralized, why are the few mobsters holding power over all of us.
Mind sharing who they are and what they did to break your heart? What's the points of creating a brand-new account if you cannot even properly state what happened? Man up or "woman up" and go straight to the point. It's just a bitcointalk account anyway. Nobody is gonna shot you or beat you up for clearly stating your dissatisfaction. |
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
|
|
April 11, 2019, 03:02:40 AM |
|
The above practice is analogous to the government refusing to impose modest regulations on the actions of an oligopoly, which results in the oligopoly imposing many restrictions on what citizens can and cannot do, and acting unfairly in the process. It is nearly impossible to rid the oligopoly of its power, due in large part to high barriers to entry. While on the other hand, if the government were to impose modest regulations unfairly, voters could vote the government out of power.
It's not like that at all. What you're proposing would put all decisions into the hands of one individual - theymos, and that doesn't seem to be something he wants. Nor is he elected in any way so if the community doesn't like his decisions - SOL. On the other hand, the current system is based on voting and the community has a lot of influence on how DT is formed. Perhaps you'd have more success if you actually exposed the "massive regulation by a select few who are accountable to no one" using facts and not some cockamamie theories. Simple math shows that this mythical group would need more than "few" of the ~80 DT1 members to have any sort of control. I would refer you to this thread. There are many people who agree lauda should not be on DT (if you don't believe me, look at the below list of the 1st 75 people who have excluded lauda), and the person behind the thread did not come anywhere close to achieving its stated goal despite stacking the deck in its favor by using 5 alts to boost its goal. Despite being involved in an extortion scheme, and multiple other controversies, he has successfully excluded everyone that has left him negative trust. The same is true for others with high trust scores who selectively scam people. |
|
|
|
|
H8bussesNbicycles
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
▄▀ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT
|
|
April 11, 2019, 03:13:09 AM |
|
the person behind the thread did not come anywhere close to achieving its stated goal despite stacking the deck in its favor by using 5 alts to boost its goal.
none of them are my alts |
▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA and Corruption FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103988
|
|
|
CryptopreneurBrainboss
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 4152
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
|
|
April 11, 2019, 03:19:56 AM
Last edit: April 11, 2019, 03:40:35 AM by CryptopreneurBrainboss |
|
How far are those decentralized forum you speak off doing? Bitcoin is decentralized not Bitcointalk so your assumptions are wrong. it'll result to an unlivable environment if the forum was to be controlled by the scammers and cheaters all asking for power through decentralization. A little centralization isn't that bad and that's the only way a forum as big as Bitcointalk can be operated. The new DT system have given power to the people to vote in or out DT members so what else do you want? You complain of centralization yet you use centralized exchange at least Bitcointalk isn't asking for your KYC everyone is free to be anonymous here if you choose to and discuss or trade peer2peer somethings involving escrow, isn't that what satoshi wanted? You just have to do things right here and you'll be fine. Avoid scam like activities, avoid defaulting any forum rules and abusing them. Do this things and you'll enjoy your stay here. Remember this guys are mostly volunteers & they're giving their best so if you find a flaws in the system, do well to alert them & always appeal your case if you know you're innocent of the accuse crime.
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
|
|
April 11, 2019, 03:27:25 AM |
|
the person behind the thread did not come anywhere close to achieving its stated goal despite stacking the deck in its favor by using 5 alts to boost its goal.
none of them are my alts I have my doubts to the accuracy of your statement, but your denial is noted. |
|
|
|
|
H8bussesNbicycles
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
▄▀ REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT
|
|
April 11, 2019, 03:56:15 AM |
|
the person behind the thread did not come anywhere close to achieving its stated goal despite stacking the deck in its favor by using 5 alts to boost its goal.
none of them are my alts I have my doubts to the accuracy of your statement, but your denial is noted. no other past or present list user is my alt I thought this forum is supposed to be decentralized, why are the few mobsters holding power over all of us. They throw out red trust like they are giving out halloween candy. Why do we continue to let them abuse and use us like this. Its just about the principle at this point, people going around bullying others What gives them the right, that guy doesn't even understand shit about bitcoin. This soundsl ike I'm frustrated, yes I am I really do care about this forum but we have bullies here that come and act like this is their house and their the kings. I've provided knowledge and help to the community and I get bunched in with the scammers and spammers for doing nothing wrong. Why is this corrupt trust system even is place, bitcointalk is falling in shambles and I know for a fact these gambling sig shillers are taking bribe money and doing backdoor deals all the time. So much corruption so much power tripping on a virtual forum that used to be a place of great discussion.
vote them out https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103988.0 |
▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ REMOVE LAUDA and Corruption FROM DT ▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄ bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103988
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
April 11, 2019, 04:00:56 AM Merited by yahoo62278 (3) |
|
I would refer you to this thread. There are many people who agree lauda should not be on DT (if you don't believe me, look at the below list of the 1st 75 people who have excluded lauda), and the person behind the thread did not come anywhere close to achieving its stated goal despite stacking the deck in its favor by using 5 alts to boost its goal. All this tells me that the system is reasonably resilient to manipulation by sockpuppeting assholes. If "many people" translates into enough DT1 exclusions then Lauda will be excluded. There are ~80 members in DT1 and only 30 or so exclusions are needed to kick Lauda off. Unless you want to show proof that 50+ DT1 members are colluding it seems that you're full of shit as usual. Despite being involved in an extortion scheme, and multiple other controversies, he has successfully excluded everyone that has left him negative trust. The same is true for others with high trust scores who selectively scam people.
Ah, the nebulous "others". Instead of throwing this nonsense around random threads you should post proper scam accusation topics (not pill addiction BS) and let the DT1 members decide if the accusations are credible and serious enough for the alleged perpetrators to be excluded. Or convince theymos to blacklist them. BTW you have excluded most DT members who negged you. But I bet there is a reason why that's totally not hypocritical. |
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
April 11, 2019, 06:16:55 AM Merited by yahoo62278 (3) |
|
I thought this forum is supposed to be decentralized
It's not decentralized. Its just about the principle at this point, people going around bullying others What gives them the right,
With the amount of time we have been here, the community gives us the right. I get bunched in with the scammers and spammers for doing nothing wrong.
Of course you did something wrong - that's why you made a new account.  |
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
TECSHARE
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
April 11, 2019, 07:27:23 AM |
|
The above practice is analogous to the government refusing to impose modest regulations on the actions of an oligopoly, which results in the oligopoly imposing many restrictions on what citizens can and cannot do, and acting unfairly in the process. It is nearly impossible to rid the oligopoly of its power, due in large part to high barriers to entry. While on the other hand, if the government were to impose modest regulations unfairly, voters could vote the government out of power.
It's not like that at all. What you're proposing would put all decisions into the hands of one individual - theymos, and that doesn't seem to be something he wants. Nor is he elected in any way so if the community doesn't like his decisions - SOL. On the other hand, the current system is based on voting and the community has a lot of influence on how DT is formed. Perhaps you'd have more success if you actually exposed the "massive regulation by a select few who are accountable to no one" using facts and not some cockamamie theories. Simple math shows that this mythical group would need more than "few" of the ~80 DT1 members to have any sort of control. I would refer you to this thread. There are many people who agree lauda should not be on DT (if you don't believe me, look at the below list of the 1st 75 people who have excluded lauda), and the person behind the thread did not come anywhere close to achieving its stated goal despite stacking the deck in its favor by using 5 alts to boost its goal. Despite being involved in an extortion scheme, and multiple other controversies, he has successfully excluded everyone that has left him negative trust. The same is true for others with high trust scores who selectively scam people. Notice how almost everyone who excludes Lauda is also excluded from the default trust list? I am sure this is just a coincidence... |
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
|
|
April 11, 2019, 07:37:19 AM |
|
Notice how almost everyone who excludes Lauda is also excluded from the default trust list? I am sure this is just a coincidence...
Ummm, obviously. It would only take approximately 30 people to exclude lauda from being in DT. Just read this explanation, and you will believe beyond a reasonable doubt, no beyond any doubt the trust system is working perfectly: All this tells me that the system is reasonably resilient to manipulation by sockpuppeting assholes. If "many people" translates into enough DT1 exclusions then Lauda will be excluded. There are ~80 members in DT1 and only 30 or so exclusions are needed to kick Lauda off. Unless you want to show proof that 50+ DT1 members are colluding it seems that you're full of shit as usual.
/s incase it was not obvious |
|
|
|
|
marlboroza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270
|
A brand new account creates a thread to complain about trust system giving zero information in topic and thread slowly become another " lauda discussion" thread. Classic sockpuppeting  OP if you don't mind, point us to your account, I would like to see reason behind this thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
