Cryptocurrency idiots donate 30K in bitcoin to Rothschild banks!

[anticonformist]

wikileaks and Assange are part of the Rothschild Family banking dynasty, see here http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/wikileaks-rothschild-operation-rothschilds-use-wikileaks-wound-rival-bank/

and some fools are still sending them more bitcoin! https://bitcoinist.com/julian-assange-20k-bitcoin-donations-wikileaks/

[pushups44]

wikileaks and Assange are part of the Rothschild Family banking dynasty, see here http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/wikileaks-rothschild-operation-rothschilds-use-wikileaks-wound-rival-bank/

and some fools are still sending them more bitcoin! https://bitcoinist.com/julian-assange-20k-bitcoin-donations-wikileaks/

Oh please! This sounds like Alex Jones. The bankers are not behind everything, contrary to what some people believe. They certainly would not release their own classified dirt and then chase themselves publicly for 7 years.

[okala]

The bank may be publicly against bitcoin but most of they top management teams are still greatly involves in bitcoin and are taking advantage of the opportunity the bitcoin network brings. Rothschild is a households name in the banking sector but have never publicly spoken against bitcoin lately.

[anticonformist]

do you not read the article, facts are facts...


1. a sister-in-law and second cousin of the Rothschilds posted bail for Julian Assange

2. The Economist (a Rothschild magazine) gave Assange its New Media Award in 2008

3. Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn a judge’s ruling to order a web host to shut down the Wikileaks site

4. The Guardian and The New York Times, two of Assange’s media partners, are linked to the Rothschilds

5. The owner of the mansion where Assange was eventually put under house arrest has links to Rothschilds

6. Assange’s lawyer is also Rothschilds’ lawyer

7. US Senator Joe Lieberman who was ultimately responsible for making Assange the largest media personality of the decade, is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations (a Rothschild organization)

[Haunebu]

do you not read the article, facts are facts...


1. a sister-in-law and second cousin of the Rothschilds posted bail for Julian Assange

2. The Economist (a Rothschild magazine) gave Assange its New Media Award in 2008

3. Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn a judge’s ruling to order a web host to shut down the Wikileaks site

4. The Guardian and The New York Times, two of Assange’s media partners, are linked to the Rothschilds

5. The owner of the mansion where Assange was eventually put under house arrest has links to Rothschilds

6. Assange’s lawyer is also Rothschilds’ lawyer

7. US Senator Joe Lieberman who was ultimately responsible for making Assange the largest media personality of the decade, is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations (a Rothschild organization)

Damn. That is a lot of evidence which does prove that there is some kind of relation between Julian and rothschild bank at the very least.

The supporters are basically donating to free Julian which is why I don't blame them in any manner whatsoever.

[poptok1]

Oh please! This sounds like Alex Jones. The bankers are not behind everything, contrary to what some people believe. They certainly would not release their own classified dirt and then chase themselves publicly for 7 years.

Well actually it does not. Not any more at least. Have you heard this guy recently?
He's basically off the track for years, it's the globalists now, the neo-cons but the actual names are left in the shadows. To many "steins" and "baums" I guess He is so called controlled opposition and as it turns out, so is Assange. I think Jones was bought around 2007, after huge success noted by loose change, that he was the executive producer of. Obvious point of no return for him.
Thanks anticonformist for this piece of info, always good to throw some of the hard questions here and there.
Luckily 30K means nothing and was seized or burned anyway.  

    

[Indamuck]

The bank may be publicly against bitcoin but most of they top management teams are still greatly involves in bitcoin and are taking advantage of the opportunity the bitcoin network brings. Rothschild is a households name in the banking sector but have never publicly spoken against bitcoin lately.

The rothschild have unlimited money because they own the banking system.  They can put any number they want to on their little computer screens.

Don't be fooled, Jeff Bezos is not the wealthiest person in the world.  There are much wealthier people hiding in the shadows.

[anticonformist]

there's more....

https://www.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2010/07/27/911-truthers-hate-on-wikileaks-founder

https://www.timesofisrael.com/wikileaks-posts-removes-anti-semitic-tweets/

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2018/03/01/rt-accidentally-busts-assange-and-wikileaks-as-cia-front/

[Beerwizzard]

Even the name of the source from the first post already sounds like the website about conspiracy theories. It is impossible to take it serious.
But anyway, if even he is a part of some rich and powerful dynasty then why shouldn't people donate him when it is needed? We should blame Rothschilds just because they got more money than you?

[lyks15]

Be carefull on doing good. You don't know if your donation is truelly came on the right person or beneficiary. Sometimes the term donation use as a scam keyword. It is not bad to give help but be carefull because if not you will give the chance to make a scam and it is like you tolerate bad activity.

[Ailmand]

I totally think it is none of our business, so what if it is Rothschild, so what if it's a bank. We don't actually know whether if banks or bankers are secretly investing in bitcoin or not. We know that cryptocurrency is created for us to break-free from banking system, but it doesn't mean that they might not be using crypto. It's a donation, it's the donor's money, we have nothing to say about it. The question is will the donation be worth the beneficiary.

[pushups44]

do you not read the article, facts are facts...


1. a sister-in-law and second cousin of the Rothschilds posted bail for Julian Assange

2. The Economist (a Rothschild magazine) gave Assange its New Media Award in 2008

3. Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn a judge’s ruling to order a web host to shut down the Wikileaks site

4. The Guardian and The New York Times, two of Assange’s media partners, are linked to the Rothschilds

5. The owner of the mansion where Assange was eventually put under house arrest has links to Rothschilds

6. Assange’s lawyer is also Rothschilds’ lawyer

7. US Senator Joe Lieberman who was ultimately responsible for making Assange the largest media personality of the decade, is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations (a Rothschild organization)

And don't forget - you share 99.9% of your DNA with the Rothschilds. You likely have read these publications at some point, possibly being subliminally influenced by them. You have used the modern banking system, and may have relatives who have invested in them. You may have shared ancestry with some crypto Jew from the 16th century who may have converted to avoid persecution. Possibly you have entered a building owned, financed, or visited at some point by a Rothschild or someone close to or intermarried with them.

You may be a part of this and not realize it.

[stompix]

do you not read the article, facts are facts...
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

8. Satoshi was Rothschild also....

Now, seriously, we talk right now 8.3798139 BTC right now.  What's that, the price of a new Ford Mondeo?
Notre-Dame fund has already close to 450 millions $, enough to buy a car plant

[avikz]

do you not read the article, facts are facts...


1. a sister-in-law and second cousin of the Rothschilds posted bail for Julian Assange

2. The Economist (a Rothschild magazine) gave Assange its New Media Award in 2008

3. Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn a judge’s ruling to order a web host to shut down the Wikileaks site

4. The Guardian and The New York Times, two of Assange’s media partners, are linked to the Rothschilds

5. The owner of the mansion where Assange was eventually put under house arrest has links to Rothschilds

6. Assange’s lawyer is also Rothschilds’ lawyer

7. US Senator Joe Lieberman who was ultimately responsible for making Assange the largest media personality of the decade, is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations (a Rothschild organization)

These may be facts! But considering the contributions of Julian Assange to the world of free information and exposing powerful government personalities, I don't necessarily see him as a threat to the crypto community, even though he may be related to Rothschild!

Julian Assange is probably one of the most important media personalities of our time and we should respect that fact! People are donatinh to show their gratitude, they must not be called idiots!

[amposed]

It seems to me that the project lacks a more active audience, and users would like to have more live communication with the team, and not with the admin in the chat. After all, no one else as a team member can explain how to competently interact with the platform. You did not try to share strategies in Taklimakan?

[jvdp]

wikileaks and Assange are part of the Rothschild Family banking dynasty, see here http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/wikileaks-rothschild-operation-rothschilds-use-wikileaks-wound-rival-bank/

and some fools are still sending them more bitcoin! https://bitcoinist.com/julian-assange-20k-bitcoin-donations-wikileaks/

May be this is fake information or the person who sent the money might receive cash equivalent to that bitcoins. I do not believe crypto investors and hodlers are stupid to do such work with Rothschild family.


If you have proof to show the transaction then we can confirm the receiver address is Rothschild's family right? Can I have addresses. We can track the centralized banking giant with the power of blockchain. Lets trash them.

[toleomasd]

It seems to me that the project lacks a more active audience, and users would like to have more live communication with the team, and not with the admin in the chat. After all, no one else as a team member can explain how to competently interact with the platform. You did not try to share strategies in Taklimakan?

I agree, I would like to directly interact with the team, not a bot, but what does the named platform have to do with it?

[amposed]

It seems to me that the project lacks a more active audience, and users would like to have more live communication with the team, and not with the admin in the chat. After all, no one else as a team member can explain how to competently interact with the platform. You did not try to share strategies in Taklimakan?

I agree, I would like to directly interact with the team, not a bot, but what does the named platform have to do with it?

Differently. For example, team members could share expert opinions and directly receive feedback from users. What also benefits the project itself, because the reputation and loyalty of users is earned. Or you can post reports about the project, how it develops, what achievements already exist. This is a social network, not a blog, because the audience is more active and always yearns for new knowledge

[dunfida]

wikileaks and Assange are part of the Rothschild Family banking dynasty, see here http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/wikileaks-rothschild-operation-rothschilds-use-wikileaks-wound-rival-bank/

and some fools are still sending them more bitcoin! https://bitcoinist.com/julian-assange-20k-bitcoin-donations-wikileaks/

Those aren't fools but those are people who do support WikiLeaks and making out some donation thru BTC. I don't see anything wrong on it yet those people aren't forced out to sent out those amounts on that given wallet. I don't care if they are attached with Rothschild's yet this is already an another segment.

[CaVO32]

These may be facts! But considering the contributions of Julian Assange to the world of free information and exposing powerful government personalities, I don't necessarily see him as a threat to the crypto community, even though he may be related to Rothschild!

Julian Assange is probably one of the most important media personalities of our time and we should respect that fact! People are donatinh to show their gratitude, they must not be called idiots!

people have different takes on this matter but i don't think calling idiots to those who are donating him is appropriate. maybe at some point, they are believers of wikileaks or have been benefited by those exposures or been happy that someone got the guts to expose those activities and the least that they can do is contribute to this person via sending btc to him. at least, being anonymous, they won't be the subject of prying eyes.