What will ICO's do with those unsold tokens?

[ogini]

Some project burn unsold token others only create tokens that will be in use which the total supply,burning of token gives the token a good value.And it is the best decision to control the value or quality of the token.

[edisystem]

Depends on the project owner and what it listed on the whitepaper. They usually just burn the unsold tokens or they give the rest as a bonus to the investors.

Actually they always explain it before the ICO start, what will happen to unsold tokens and etc.

[muratsink]

yes. some teams will decide to burn, or distribute by making airdrop, or the team can also extend the sale of tokens. but. professional teams always pay attention to sales and registration strategies on the exchange. if the team's orientation is a benefit, the team will register the coin in a large exchange, even if the coin is not sold all. like odem.

[killat]

The fairest option for unsold tokens is to burn them.

This will defend investor's interests, because the price should increase as total supply will decrease.

[Gontxi]

I have seen many ICO's selling tokens for cryptocurrencies. What will they do with those unsold tokens at the end of their ICO? Some say they will burn it so no one can use it. Are they burning it or is it really the good to burn those unsold tokens?

you can check it, because there is a mechanism for burning unsold altcoins.
usually the team or developer will announce on the telegram network. I think you need to explore a lot for your knowledge and experience, especially in investing in ico or participating in campaigns

[Boombull]

It all depends on the projectsvand their plan of actions. Some usually burn it off in order to reduce the total and circulating supply of the token ehy some keep it for other activities within their project ecosystem. So there's no fixed down rule on what to do about it.

[leea-1334]

As my experienced, there are only 2 ways what team do to unsold tokens. They will either burn it or just distribute it to all holders in a fair way so somehow all holders get some profit to it.

Correct. They will usually try to go for a burn option first to make the supply smaller and therefore all current holders expect to see value go up,,, but this never works in my opinion because it assumes there is already demand, which there is not.

I have definitely seen ICO refunds happen and cancelled,,, then they just switch to airdrop and distribute tokens out and hope that it gets listed and owners can dump it anyway!

[Fesatmas]

Burning unsold tokens is good, meaning the token will not be too much and I also wonder why the token has been burned but the price is still below.

[eann014]

I have seen many of ICO's selling tokens for cryptocurrencies. What will they do with those unsold tokens at the end of their ICO? Some say they will burn it so no one can use it. Are they burning it or is it really the good to burn those unsold tokens?

It is better to burn those unsold tokens so the value of the coin will increase and those who buy it will totally be sold their coins because of the increasing value of it, they will get profit.

[mcnocon2]

I have seen many ICO's selling tokens for cryptocurrencies. What will they do with those unsold tokens at the end of their ICO? Some say they will burn it so no one can use it. Are they burning it or is it really the good to burn those unsold tokens?

Depends mate. Sometime burning tokens are helping and sometime's not. If they have a huge supply of tokens and lots of tokens arent sold, it is approriate to burn those. Actually if they have legal actions or statement that announce of burning they must since it is duly noted on the contract. But if youre supply is limited, I think better to used those unsold tokens for marketing strategy such as bounty or exchange voting rewards. In that way it is used up on the benefit of the project and its price.

I agree with this, burning unsold tokens really gonna help the project directly. But if they write it down on their whitepaper that they will burned the unsold tokens they must do so to avoid confusion and for the community to trust their words.

[Frank Walters]

Usually they burn it!

[steveabrahams]

I have seen many of ICO's selling tokens for cryptocurrencies. What will they do with those unsold tokens at the end of their ICO? Some say they will burn it so no one can use it. Are they burning it or is it really the good to burn those unsold tokens?

It is better to burn those unsold tokens so the value of the coin will increase and those who buy it will totally be sold their coins because of the increasing value of it, they will get profit.

Not really, they can just hold it more if they think the price can increase. Unsold tokens usually will get burn but if the ICO is not reach softcap, then the project and the tokens will canceled, no more unsold tokens lol. The sad is there are always unsold tokens on every ICO, because investor no more invest on ICO again.

[irixo10]

Different things or approach for different ICOs, while some burn the unsold token thus reducing total supply others tends to share it as bonus to all investors. Those who share theirs as bonus most times causes the price of their token to crash as investors now have excess tokens to dump.

[Ucy]

They normally burn the unsold tokens to prevent inflation or lock it up for a specific number of years for thesame reasons.

Burning is the right thing to otherwise the developers could dump the unsold tokens in the future and crashed the price. An alternative to burning would be to locking the tokens for a long time.
.

[Fluxtorrence9]

For exampe bluenote project keeps there unsold tokens stating that it will be locked away for future use either from the teams or for the project development but I think the best way is to burn the tokens it will help the price of each tokens as the max supply will get lower

[HELLOFF]

For exampe bluenote project keeps there unsold tokens stating that it will be locked away for future use either from the teams or for the project development but I think the best way is to burn the tokens it will help the price of each tokens as the max supply will get lower

In fact, professional teams act differently about their tokens. Some unsold tokens burn, while others release all tokens to the stock exchange and then buy their tokens for a certain period, thereby reducing their number. I do not know which approach is right, but nevertheless, professionals know their work.

[No Pain No blood]

For exampe bluenote project keeps there unsold tokens stating that it will be locked away for future use either from the teams or for the project development but I think the best way is to burn the tokens it will help the price of each tokens as the max supply will get lower

In fact, professional teams act differently about their tokens. Some unsold tokens burn, while others release all tokens to the stock exchange and then buy their tokens for a certain period, thereby reducing their number. I do not know which approach is right, but nevertheless, professionals know their work.

I'm right, but it's normal if they don't burn unsold tokens that will make a problem. investors will be afraid to buy because the team may suddenly sell all unsold tokens to the market. this is very bad for the price of the token. I prefer projects that choose to burn their tokens.

[Annalise24]

I think some of the projects do airdrops with a certain percentage of unsold tokens while most burn the coins .
Some not too honest projects will say that they have burned the coins only to dump it on investors on listing to an exchange.

[Balzhi]

there is differennt options. they can burn them. they can lock them on years. or they can say that they lock them and than sold them on exchange and get more money

[Cocoincos]

good projects burn unsold tokens, but I know many projects are speculating on it and selling their coins for little money