Red trust for asking questions and examining evidence now?

[The-One-Above-All]

I notice that asking questions and the public examination of evidence is now worthy of red trust?

Whistle blowers are getting a hard time lately?

[1714775449]

1714775449

[OgNasty]

You aren't allowed to question Lauda's associates here or point out their wrongdoings without receiving negative trust.  I suspect things will remain this way until theymos shakes up DT with something new again.

[hilariousandco]

Whistle blowers are getting a hard time lately?

Yep.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I notice that asking questions and the public examination of evidence is now worthy of red trust?

The only 'question' I saw you ask was a bullshit one about Hhampuz, and there was no credible evidence in that thread of any wrongdoing.  If you're going to go way beyond trolling and impugn a trusted member's reputation, don't come bitching about the red trust you receive.  No one should trust someone who makes up lies about people--especially ones who are clearly very trusted.

Just take a hike.  There have already been too many threads like this, and they all end the same.  Theymos doesn't respond to them, but I'm pretty sure he reads them.  That should give you an idea of the creedence he gives to all of this nonsense.  You're wasting your time, and you're annoying everyone else.

[bones261]

You aren't allowed to question Lauda's associates here or point out their wrongdoings without receiving negative trust.  I suspect things will remain this way until theymos shakes up DT with something new again.

     Theymos has already indicated that if he does another shake up, it will be to require that people set up their own custom trust lists. Many of the people that you are complaining about already have a certain amount of recognition and notoriety around here. I suspect that this move may dilute their influence a tad bit. However, I suspect the end results will still not be to your satisfaction.

[The-One-Above-All]

I notice that asking questions and the public examination of evidence is now worthy of red trust?

The only 'question' I saw you ask was a bullshit one about Hhampuz, and there was no credible evidence in that thread of any wrongdoing.  If you're going to go way beyond trolling and impugn a trusted member's reputation, don't come bitching about the red trust you receive.  No one should trust someone who makes up lies about people--especially ones who are clearly very trusted.

Just take a hike.  There have already been too many threads like this, and they all end the same.  Theymos doesn't respond to them, but I'm pretty sure he reads them.  That should give you an idea of the creedence he gives to all of this nonsense.  You're wasting your time, and you're annoying everyone else.

creeeeedence

Annonying? then do not read the thread.

The evidence can be examined if I wish it to be. The evidence will be reviewed in public. We have reviewed the evidence many times and it seems rather damning. Are you claiming that red trust should be given in this case?

There is no reason to allow persons to give out red trust if you wish to examine in public evidence they do not wish to be heard.

This is a very strange trust system.  

[Flying Hellfish]

When you show up to a place and present yourself as a raving lunatic you probably shouldn't be surprised when people treat you like a raving lunatic...