Coin merger?

[Rogkim1]

Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?

How do you imagine the merger? For what?
I see no point in this. It is stupid to do it, it is difficult to do it. And most importantly, I do not see the point.

[Irvinn]

Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?

The merger of coins is actually a merger of business, and this process is very complicated. It is necessary to take into account that the teams that are behind these coins, in most cases, will be located in different countries and in different legislation. However, this process is already happening in practice. I participated in several ICOs, which already during the fundraising process announced that they were merging with other teams and that they would later conduct a joint ICO.
So this idea is not new and is used in the cryptocurrency as needed.

[rocku12345]

You are talking nonsense. Merging is not possible here. This is not a friendship, this is a business. There may be absorption or destruction. And no other options.

Business ? When two big companies in real life making a Corporation..it is ok? So why not to make the same in crypto world. Especially when too many coins are young and so difficult to get listed on stock exchanges. Also several of projects are tecnically vulnerable for hackers. Crypto unions may produce something big and more usefull for independant financial community.

[D ltr]

it is impossible, because every coin project also has a different vision and mission, the business that it runs is different. if it is forced to be merger, it means that the total supply will increase? it will affect the price of the two coins, the price will definitely decrease

[MakeMoneyBtc]

I am not sure if what you are saying is possible, at least no one has ever tried it before so we don't know if it's going to work or not. The idea is not bad, just like a big company would help a smaller company that is almost bankrupt to get back on the track and then be one and the same company but still we are talking about cryptocurrencies here and don't know how that's going to work.

[$Andreyka$]

Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?

Currently, more and more examples of the separation of coins (fork). I think in connection with the merger, there can be great difficulties. How do you imagine for example the merger of DASH and MONERO? And why should they need it?
Another thing is when projects that are at the very start are merged. It is precisely from such a merger that there can be win - win.

[harbin55]

Merger is a great thing wherein two or more companies megre into one entity to provide a better services to the public;  from this it opens new doors of opportunity which will leads you to success.  Just like what other people says "two heads are better than one". A partnership creates more money in future

[33bitcoin]

Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?

Currently, more and more examples of the separation of coins (fork). I think in connection with the merger, there can be great difficulties. How do you imagine for example the merger of DASH and MONERO? And why should they need it?
Another thing is when projects that are at the very start are merged. It is precisely from such a merger that there can be win - win.

A lot of these merged coins are complete scams.  like calling something ebitcoin and saying its bitcoin on an the ethereum network.  I'm not a buyer of forks and I wan't fall for any of this nonsense.

[Galantin]

Yes of course. Everyone is talking about product upgrades. And in fact, they create another waste that is not needed. I have already seen such coins here on the forum. And they all turned out to be scam projects.