Coin merger?

[libert19]

Coin teams can abandon one, join the party with another and continue with the one project, that would mean the same thing, I guess?

[BitcoinHunt3r]

Never see coin that merge before, because each coin have their own chain and maybe it will hard to merge it. Maybe if 2 corporation which merge and make new coin from it, it still can be possible to do.

[BlueStackz]

Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?

The selfish factor would not allow this to be possible for many of them, as they would like to stand alone to gather all the profit instead of sharing, but this would not have been a bad idea, it will limit the number of coins we see on the market today without adding any meaning thing to the society.

The funny thing about them is that most of these coins that become shit later have similar concept which would have gone a long way of they had merged to execute such project, but the question is, who wants to approach who? Will some of their ago too create chance for such negotiation talk less of carrying it out, let just hope new projects will learn and do better.

[d1ceplayer]

Coin teams can abandon one, join the party with another and continue with the one project, that would mean the same thing, I guess?

Yeah, it will mean the same but will move the project forward and better, it would also limit or reduce the number of projects that we have in the market sharing the same ideas.

If the contract is properly signed, I don’t think any of them would try to abandon one another when the project peaks since it has legal implication, I guess it is only the crowd funding that has anonymity in it and not the project itself, they have to establish the project physically and before they can do so, it must have gone through a legal procedures. So I think it will be a very welcomed development if projects can merge.

[Levyathan]

You mean, both projects merge? Ah, I don't think even if there was a merger as the solution to help the investor to earn more profits. But, as you know that there are so many projects nowadays died, they just left it behind and create a new project instead.

[DreamStage]

Well in terms of network algorithms it might be complicated and causing issues with transactions, networks and people's wallets.
If we do ever get those merges (it might be possible) it will require some sort of advance technology for compatibility issues.

[Ailmand]

I think it wouldn't be possible since every coin has its own target goal. If they would have the same strategy and purpose, then merging would be easy but we could all notice that most coins these days are just cloning the old ones just to gain more investors again.  However, this idea is also helpful for some dying coins at some point.

[bitstalker]

I think it's an interesting idea, but as we know, each coin has a different purpose and function and also not to mention the ico and other token utilities, but it might be applied if the concept is similarly combined (maybe)

[Ucy]

I think this can be done.  But how are you going to merge the codes of very different projects/blockchains?  It'll probably be easy to merge the users but challenging to merge transactions from different blockchains .  Unless you use some sort of sidechain to link them together. Or maybe it is  possible already to merge blockchains? What do I know.

[Judge-Dredd]

There would have to be a technical reason and implementation  plan for two chains to merge. Otherwise  it's just a marketing ploy.

[futile-resistance]

Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?

Once two coins merge together, then it has automatically become one project, so the question is which team will want to give up their project for another team to become a star, I don't think most team and coin owners will want that to happen, and besides most of the coins in the market that don't have large trading volumes is as a result of not having something good to deliver to the crypto community because one thing I know in this space is that good project can't be left hidden for a long while and people will still fall back to it one way or another.

[jrrsparkles]

Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?

You don't understand how the cryptos were working,even if you merge token the prices won't increase until the demand increases so it is not a good idea if they don't have potential they will not survive for too long.

[steveabrahams]

Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?

Uh i'm not sure about that because it will takes a long time to do, i think it's called swap? I don't know, i think i never heard about this method coin merger. If both coins are trash, merger is kinda useless imo. People will still not buying the coins because it will have low price.

[beachbummer]

Guys I have one idea running in my mind. There are hundreds of coins in the market and much more are waiting for hitting the market. Some of them are have much potentiality to dominate the market and stay, but many of them cannot compete and disappear or die young age.
So in such case facing the market, what about merger? If a good coin is ready to merge with another one, are not these problems resolved? And there will be a win-to-win situation?

Your idea was for 2 coins to merge into 1 coin that overrides both coins. One coin implementation that comes close to your idea will be BTCP (Bitcoin Private) that combined both the Bitcoin and ZClassic chains to form a new coin. However, both the BTC and ZCL coins are still existing. So this comes close to your idea but is not exactly the same.

[cassavachips]

I don't think so, it's not as simple as you say, different platforms have different ideas, they cannot be combined just like that, approval also needed between the two different project teams

[anatolij.shishkin]

I think that many have come to such ideas. I do not think that merging is not possible. For all investors, you can simply release the exchange. Where everyone can exchange a coin. A merger can give a very serious growth. In fact, you increase the impact on the market.

[Soberb]

This maybe a good idea for a coin to merge with multiple like-hearted coins. But the question always remains that whether good and promising coins are ready to merge with shitcoins. If the merger happens, the market will get rid of so much numbers of coins and save the coins that are about to disappear due to lack of competition and their failure to perform well. Merger between various projects is beneficial from financial point of view and it will also result in making projects strong from other perspectives as well.

[beerlover]

You mean, both projects merge? Ah, I don't think even if there was a merger as the solution to help the investor to earn more profits. But, as you know that there are so many projects nowadays died, they just left it behind and create a new project instead.

I think the reason why its best for them to merge is because many of these people that wish to own a project runs out of idea, so they create a problem that does not exist and without solution as a project.

Instead of wasting time and energy to create a new one, the little good idea they have which we are very sure that one or two of the other projects have same, they can merge and solve the problem together as one, instead of having a split community, there will be more community to continue backing such project up and will cause the project value to rise to its pick.

[ivaf]

You are talking nonsense. Merging is not possible here. This is not a friendship, this is a business. There may be absorption or destruction. And no other options.

[MMA Rats]

I also believe that the merger of coins can not be in principle.  Because our people are very greedy.  And everyone wants to have their own coin.  Because now there are so many coins.