gdeglin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 02:34:11 AM Last edit: March 13, 2014, 03:00:31 AM by gdeglin |
|
A couple Verizon techs knocked on my door today with a bunch of equipment. Turns our my mid-sized mining setup (11 cards) is causing interference with a cell phone tower that's 800ft away. So much so that they've spent quite a while tracking down the source. They checked each rig separately (all mostly running R9 280x's from a variety of manufacturers) and found that each one was emitting the same amount of interference, ruling out any potential individual component that was causing the problem. They asked me to turn them all off until I can find a way to shield them from causing interference. They offered to come back and test again after I move things around and find a way to block the interference. I'm hoping that a makeshift faraday cage with some chicken wire will do the trick. If you're located near a cell tower and currently mining or plan to, be warned: You might get paid a visit by your local cell phone carrier and have to turn it all off ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 02:36:51 AM |
|
What can they do if you refuse to do so?
|
|
|
|
gdeglin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 02:53:08 AM |
|
What can they do if you refuse to do so?
They hinted that it may be against the law and that there could be penalties if I turned them back on. I didn't argue with them too much about it. But I'm interested in hearing if the community here has any thoughts on it.
|
|
|
|
Sukarti
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 03:31:08 AM |
|
Tell them you'll gladly turn them off if they compensate you monthly for your mining profitability + a percentage.
Otherwise tell them to piss off and get off your property!
It may be a crime to "maliciously" interfere with the tower but you could easily circumvent that.
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 03:33:38 AM |
|
Isn't the whole point of a FCC approval to make sure that communications equipment doesn't cause interference in neighboring systems, and to be as resilient as possible to nearby residual interference? If that's the case, then I'd say that they did a lousy job with whatever equipment is in that Verizon tower: Probably a CMDA or LTE antenna?
And 800ft seems kinda far. I mean BT and Wifi only have a range of a few hundred feet, and when you're talking almost 1,000 ft, that seems kinda far.
What kind of laws are you breaking by running NON-COMMUNICATIONS equipment that happens to be nearby to a cell tower? I mean my Gigabyte 280x all have a FCC approved label on them, and I'd assume all GPUs would. I don't see how they could fine you for running FCC approved, non-communications computer hardware in your own home. I'm no lawyer, but I'd keep running them regardless of what some technician tells me, and if they really do have a law or regulation somewhere that tells me I can't, then I'd consider stopping.
So in the end, I say it's bullshit, but what does my opinion matter? If you really want to keep them up, I'd say you gotta ask a few questions: 1) What kind of cell tower is nearby? What frequencies? 2) What kind of interference is being emitted? What specific frequencies? 3) What laws or regulations are there that say you can't run your hardware? 4) Are these laws or regulations enforced? What fines/consequences are there?
That's just to start. I'm sure I'll have more questions once you get those 4 answered.
|
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 03:40:54 AM |
|
Isn't the whole point of a FCC approval to make sure that communications equipment doesn't cause interference in neighboring systems, and to be as resilient as possible to nearby residual interference? If that's the case, then I'd say that they did a lousy job with whatever equipment is in that Verizon tower: Probably a CMDA or LTE antenna? if you're in the states, computers fall under 47 US code part 15 subpart b: "unintentional radiators" (lawl) http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/part-15/subpart-Bthis is why electronics are certified with a faraday cage (i.e. metal case) to contain the electronics which may cause interference. if the videocard is freeballin' outside a case, it probably does cause all sorts of short-range radio noise because no mfg. i know spends money to shield each individual component.
|
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
|
alani123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1468
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 03:50:21 AM |
|
How is this even possible?
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
gweedo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 03:51:48 AM |
|
A couple Verizon techs knocked on my door today with a bunch of equipment. Turns our my mid-sized mining setup (11 cards) is causing interference with a cell phone tower that's 800ft away. So much so that they've spent quite a while tracking down the source. They checked each rig separately (all mostly running R9 280x's from a variety of manufacturers) and found that each one was emitting the same amount of interference, ruling out any potential individual component that was causing the problem. They asked me to turn them all off until I can find a way to shield them from causing interference. They offered to come back and test again after I move things around and find a way to block the interference. I'm hoping that a makeshift faraday cage with some chicken wire will do the trick. If you're located near a cell tower and currently mining or plan to, be warned: You might get paid a visit by your local cell phone carrier and have to turn it all off ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) I would tell them to send the law. I doubt the FCC is going to take on one dude in one neighbor for one cell tower. Also I would tell them that it is compute equipment that you are not doing anything illegal with.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinQTlol
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 03:52:28 AM |
|
lol, spooky how they tracked u down
|
|
|
|
gdeglin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 04:04:07 AM |
|
Isn't the whole point of a FCC approval to make sure that communications equipment doesn't cause interference in neighboring systems, and to be as resilient as possible to nearby residual interference? If that's the case, then I'd say that they did a lousy job with whatever equipment is in that Verizon tower: Probably a CMDA or LTE antenna?
And 800ft seems kinda far. I mean BT and Wifi only have a range of a few hundred feet, and when you're talking almost 1,000 ft, that seems kinda far.
What kind of laws are you breaking by running NON-COMMUNICATIONS equipment that happens to be nearby to a cell tower? I mean my Gigabyte 280x all have a FCC approved label on them, and I'd assume all GPUs would. I don't see how they could fine you for running FCC approved, non-communications computer hardware in your own home. I'm no lawyer, but I'd keep running them regardless of what some technician tells me, and if they really do have a law or regulation somewhere that tells me I can't, then I'd consider stopping.
So in the end, I say it's bullshit, but what does my opinion matter? If you really want to keep them up, I'd say you gotta ask a few questions: 1) What kind of cell tower is nearby? What frequencies? 2) What kind of interference is being emitted? What specific frequencies? 3) What laws or regulations are there that say you can't run your hardware? 4) Are these laws or regulations enforced? What fines/consequences are there?
That's just to start. I'm sure I'll have more questions once you get those 4 answered.
800ft does seem relatively far for me too, but one of the four antennas on the tower is pointed directly at us with line of sight so that may be a factor. I don't know much about FCC approval. My theory is that the cards weren't intended to be used in this way, and maybe they would have failed FCC tests if they were. Just speculation on my part though. They suggested that I contact the manufacturer and complain, but I doubt that would get me anywhere. As for leaving the rigs running, it's not worth the few $ a day to risk the FCC knocking at my door next. The technicians seemed relieved that they finally found the source of what seems to have been a big issue for them, so I didn't want to be a jerk and refuse to turn it off. They said the interference was around the 835mhz range. Wikipedia indicates that Verizon and ATT run their voice service at 850mhz, so I guess that's pretty close.
|
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 04:34:27 AM |
|
And 800ft seems kinda far. I mean BT and Wifi only have a range of a few hundred feet, and when you're talking almost 1,000 ft, that seems kinda far.
800' seems far for BT and WiFi IFF it is operating within FCC limits ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) if you install open firmware on your router you can boost the signal strength to the limit of your hardware. They said the interference was around the 835mhz range. Wikipedia indicates that Verizon and ATT run their voice service at 850mhz, so I guess that's pretty close.
did they mention what their measured signal strength from your interference was from the antenna? this may look ridiculous, but you can get 100db of noise reduction by literally wallpapering your mining room with kitchen tinfoil. http://www.thesurvivalistblog.net/build-your-own-faraday-cage-heres-how/make sure you save some for hatmaking.
|
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
Korporal
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 04:44:28 AM |
|
For starters, why the hell did you admit anything to strangers knocking on your door? Unless they have: A) A gun with a corresponding badge with arresting authority B) A Search Warrant Tell them to piss off.Now that the cat is out of the bag, turn your rigs back on. If they come back tell them they are still off since the last time they visited. If they question you, tell them to kindly leave your property. If they insist on staying or want to gain access, call the police immediately. By the time the FCC convinces a Federal Judge to obtain a search warrant (a long time), the scrypt diff will be so high you probably switched to ASICS by then, lol. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) You do have rights you know.
|
|
|
|
msc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 04:47:49 AM |
|
if the videocard is freeballin' outside a case, it probably does cause all sorts of short-range radio noise
Yeah, that would be my thought. Running without a case probably voids the FCC compliance. There may or may not actually be a law, but the "F" in FCC means that won't stop them.
|
|
|
|
Korporal
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 04:54:21 AM |
|
if the videocard is freeballin' outside a case, it probably does cause all sorts of short-range radio noise
Yeah, that would be my thought. Running without a case probably voids the FCC compliance. There may or may not actually be a law, but the "F" in FCC means that won't stop them. There is no law on what sort of case you need to use. You don't legally need a case. The cards are tested alone for interference. I have miners in 1/2 case, no case and even a lexan full case! Am I not allowed to use lexan? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I've seen Dell cases that could probably withstand a friggin EMP pulse and I've seen cases made out of wood. All "legal".
|
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 05:07:02 AM Last edit: March 13, 2014, 05:17:20 AM by kalus |
|
if the videocard is freeballin' outside a case, it probably does cause all sorts of short-range radio noise
Yeah, that would be my thought. Running without a case probably voids the FCC compliance. There may or may not actually be a law, but the "F" in FCC means that won't stop them. There is no law on what sort of case you need to use. You don't legally need a case. The cards are tested alone for interference. I have miners in 1/2 case, no case and even a lexan full case! Am I not allowed to use lexan? the FCC doesn't give a shit what your case is made of, or if you have no case. they only care if you are generating interference. No federal law prohibits lexan cases, if its components do generate interference, the case must contain a faraday cage/EMI shielding to control interference if your hardware happens to emit radiointerference on the frequencies they care about. e.g. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM29CWQp.png&t=665&c=GbXZtaQYkqnY_Q) if you are selling computers, you technically need to comply with FCC guidelines. that's why prebuilt computers, radios, printers, monitors, and even mobile phones have FCC certification logos on them. there are different regulations covering assembled computers for sale. I've seen Dell cases that could probably withstand a friggin EMP pulse and I've seen cases made out of wood. All "legal".
a wooden case can be made with EMI shielding on the inside; it's extremely simple to be compliant as mentioned above, some times it can be a sheet or two of metallic foil. an anti-static bag is also a faraday cage. it's not that hard to meet FCC regulations. frequently it's the knockoff crap (e.g. imitation or imported phone chargers, counterfeit light ballasts, grey market goods) that have fake logos or certifications that are causing the problem. it's not only in US either: butterflylabs had asics siezed by germany for faking european CE certifications http://buttcoin.org/butterfly-labs-caught-allegedly-faking-ce-certification-bitcoiner-gets-his-miner-seized-in-germany
|
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 05:26:28 AM |
|
For starters, why the hell did you admit anything to strangers knocking on your door? Unless they have: A) A gun with a corresponding badge with arresting authority B) A Search Warrant Tell them to piss off.Now that the cat is out of the bag, turn your rigs back on. If they come back tell them they are still off since the last time they visited. If they question you, tell them to kindly leave your property. If they insist on staying or want to gain access, call the police immediately. By the time the FCC convinces a Federal Judge to obtain a search warrant (a long time), the scrypt diff will be so high you probably switched to ASICS by then, lol. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) You do have rights you know. this is correct. (i'm not a lawyer) verizon technicians don't have any authority over you and you can tell them to go away. however, OP will probably get a letter from verizon. then verizon will make a report to the FCC. then the FCC will write OP another letter, and may come visit OP. this is what you should do if the FCC visits: these are your rights. http://www.roguecom.com/rogueradio/fccknocks.htmlOTOH, If the op gets rid of the interference himself, there is no complaint and all of this hassle goes away. verizon is not asking anything unreasonable; they don't give a shit about your mining operation if it doesn't affect their phone operation. it's far simpler to do some research, and shield your mining operation with a faraday cage than to have a showdown in federal court.
|
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
slightboyme
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 07:13:02 AM |
|
Are we talking about potential health issues with mining rigs?
|
|
|
|
maardein
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 13, 2014, 08:03:41 AM |
|
There actually was someone in the Netherlands that had about the same happen to him. It was a thread in the Dutch subforum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488572.0
|
BTC: 1788UegKXGXXicfPcbZ1bmSUJ99ZWRCF7p LTC: LZ2rCcoxK4X8wRRynqdxoimd4d3TDNk7Lk PMP: PApSSdorQds5tQysymwDXPAN3viJLFTUs8
|
|
|
ThePeePs
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
https://cryptassist.io
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 14, 2014, 03:05:43 PM |
|
Two things: 1) If your rigs are emitting enough RF "noise", then it wouldn't be that hard for VZ techs to find the source. 2) 835 MHz != 850 MHz. I know the numbers look like they are "close" but not when it comes to RF. Look at how many channels we have for Wifi. The non-overlapping ones are 25 MHz apart (same as 835 to 850). You can have two wifi networks running right next to each other, one on channel 1 and one channel 6, and have them work perfectly. I too call BS.
|
|
|
|
|