red trust anyone promoting Yobit

[Dig Bicks]

Can't believe more people aren't tagging people wearing a yobit signature.  One of the biggest scams in the crypto world.

[marcotheminer]

Can't believe more people aren't tagging people wearing a yobit signature.  One of the biggest scams in the crypto world.

They may have non-token IEO's, but anyone investing in those cannot easily claim to have been tricked.. Many (all?) people enter voluntarily, try to compete against others who also enter voluntarily - trying to be first in, first out. Yobit actually has as much track record as PD and more than Livecoin (I think?), albeit from an anonymous standpoint.. Livecoin actually has just-as-questionable listings too.. If we start tagging everyone who has things "others disagree with" in their signatures - the forum is going to Mexican standoff itself into red trust everywhere..

[RajeshKarwa]

Can't believe more people aren't tagging people wearing a yobit signature.  One of the biggest scams in the crypto world.

I can't say much but i agree with your point in case of their INVESTBOX system. I was victim of their investbox system when they launched LIZA claiming their own exchange coin / token. After people invested in these investboxes the exchange used to denomination and come up with new fork coins in an average  once every month and that way they keep reducing the value and quantity of coins in even existing investboxes and steal users a lot of money.

So at some point i agree with your point that exchange is scaming and stealing money from users.

You can see many this kind of cases about the exchange - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4327871.0

[TheNewAnon135246]

Can't believe more people aren't tagging people wearing a yobit signature.  One of the biggest scams in the crypto world.

They may have non-token IEO's, but anyone investing in those cannot easily claim to have been tricked.. Many (all?) people enter voluntarily, try to compete against others who also enter voluntarily - trying to be first in, first out. Yobit actually has as much track record as PD and more than Livecoin (I think?), albeit from an anonymous standpoint.. Livecoin actually has just-as-questionable listings too.. If we start tagging everyone who has things "others disagree with" in their signatures - the forum is going to Mexican standoff itself into red trust everywhere..

Just out of interest, why are you wearing a YoBit signature?

Users with negative feedback from defaulttrust members are no longer permitted on the campaign. If you sign up you will be removed.[/url]

[Bttzed03]

Can't believe more people aren't tagging people wearing a yobit signature.  One of the biggest scams in the crypto world.

I don't think it's fair to do that. Many are still using yobit despite the many scam accusations.

It seems that none of the DT members are willing to tagged users here for simply wearing yobit signature (read the comments in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134204.0)

[Golgoth]

Can't believe more people aren't tagging people wearing a yobit signature.  One of the biggest scams in the crypto world.

You can't do that

Theymos had been very clear about that

I do not view it as appropriate for trust ratings to relate primarily to non-trust matters. By giving someone negative trust, you're basically attaching a note to all of their posts telling people "warning: do not trade with this person!".
[...]
- Giving negative trust for being an annoying poster is inappropriate, since this has nothing to do with their trustworthiness. If they're disrupting discussion or never adding anything, then that's something for moderators to deal with, and you should report their posts and/or complain in Meta about it.
 - Giving negative trust for merit trading and deceptive alt-account use may be appropriate, but you should use a light touch so that people don't feel paranoid.
 - You should be willing to forgive past mistakes if the person seems unlikely to do it again.
- It is absolutely not appropriate to give someone negative trust because you disagree with them.

[target]

The signature campaign of yobit were running for the longest time even before 2015, it was just close for new registrant but currently re-opened . If the participants of the campaign are to be red tagged, they would have done it to the users who were doing it since 2016. Yobit is an exchange, things happen to all exchange l.If they were planing to scam they would have done it and close the exchange last 2017.

[r1s2g3]

The signature campaign of yobit were running for the longest time even before 2015, it was just close for new registrant but currently re-opened . If the participants of the campaign are to be red tagged, they would have done it to the users who were doing it since 2016. Yobit is an exchange, things happen to all exchange l.If they were planing to scam they would have done it and close the exchange last 2017.

Because they are getting more BTC by keeping the exchange open that's why they do not closed it. (Earning BTC by their IEO, listing coins)
And you never know if they close on 2019. They have lot of negative feedbacks and "Yobit" is now not posting in this forum, so I guess they have no mood to resolve these cases.

[FaucetKING]

Is that even logical? Some peoples are still using the platform even when it has an invest box which is somehow called " a shady investment'' by some members here .. Peoples still use the platform even with the bad reputation, and even DT members sayed that we can wear the signature.. how could you just say '' tag all the persons wearing the signature" ?
I highly recommend that you prove to us all that yobit is a scam, we will opt out.. or just stay silent

[The Cryptovator]

I don't think average tag is appropriate for ware signature. Most of they are spammers but admin isn't encourage about tag to spammer. This subject to be handle by moderators. Yes, there is few scam accusation against them. If we compare, then we will found scam accusation against every exchange. And how we believe every accusation is true? My 0.1BTC was blocked by Yobit a years ago. But I was able to withdraw almost after 6 months. So it's not easy task to determine which is valid accusation. Sometimes they block account due to users mistakes for violates of terms and conditions.

So I am not agree to tag average to all signature participants.

[acharias]

Anyone who breaks the forum rules multiple times should get a red tag. I don't see any issues with the Yobit campaign, as long as the participants follow the forum rules.

[Findingnemo]

Anyone who breaks the forum rules multiple times should get a red tag. I don't see any issues with the Yobit campaign, as long as the participants follow the forum rules.

Anyone who break the forum rules will get temporary or permaban,so red tag isn't appropriate even we can use the forum as before while having red tag only it will hurts if you are going to join on the signature campaigns.

About Yobit the story continues everywhere...

[acharias]

Anyone who breaks the forum rules multiple times should get a red tag. I don't see any issues with the Yobit campaign, as long as the participants follow the forum rules.

Anyone who break the forum rules will get temporary or permaban,so red tag isn't appropriate even we can use the forum as before while having red tag only it will hurts if you are going to join on the signature campaigns.

About Yobit the story continues everywhere...

Getting a negative rating (from a DT member) means you can't join the Yobit campaign, or any other signature campaign. That will hopefully encourage users to cut down on the spam and nonsense posts. I don't see the issue at all.

[Harlot]

I like to see how other DT members will respond to this Yobit campaign since clearly Yobit isn't in the clear yet anf all their tags are not yet resolved. It's like if they allowed this participants to wear their signature they are as if allowing them to promote an untrusted exchange in the forum which is really a bad thing overall. Looking at the 2nd opinion from other DT members would be interesting, I just want to know what is their part on Yobit's comeback in the forum.

[Findingnemo]

Anyone who breaks the forum rules multiple times should get a red tag. I don't see any issues with the Yobit campaign, as long as the participants follow the forum rules.

Anyone who break the forum rules will get temporary or permaban,so red tag isn't appropriate even we can use the forum as before while having red tag only it will hurts if you are going to join on the signature campaigns.

About Yobit the story continues everywhere...

Getting a negative rating (from a DT member) means you can't join the Yobit campaign, or any other signature campaign. That will hopefully encourage users to cut down on the spam and nonsense posts. I don't see the issue at all.

Theymos never want to tag the spammers,the use of DT system has other roles.Spammers has to face the merit system and it will be hard to get merit if someone spamming so yobit has to handle the signature campaign in the right manner,if they don't have any criteria then everyone will join on it.

[The-One-Above-All]

Yobit is a clear clam site. They deactivate coins wallets even when there are 100% working versions on other exchanges and do not even engage with the project developers when they try to contact them.

They take coins off line and will not reactivate the wallets. Some have been offline for years.

They create their own isolated markets and steal from those that deposited their coins there in good faith.

[2girls]

Can't believe more people aren't tagging people wearing a yobit signature.  One of the biggest scams in the crypto world.

Yobit is not a scam exchange and we can wear the signature of any campaign we want. You need to understand the read the rules of Red trust before commenting on this topic.

[Thule]

They would need first to red trust anybody promoting the casinos

[crairezx20]

Can't believe more people aren't tagging people wearing a yobit signature.  One of the biggest scams in the crypto world.

Yobit is not a scam exchange and we can wear the signature of any campaign we want. You need to understand the read the rules of Red trust before commenting on this topic.

The only reason that they were called yobit as scammers it's because most of the shitcoin wallets are locked that there's no chance to withdraw them even contacting their support and another reason is Yobit support is the worst support ever that I experienced before but even though you can still withdraw your major coins unlike shitcoin that mostly turn into scam.

I don't see any reason of tagging people by wearing yobit sigs what they need to do is to find alt accounts who abuse their sig campaign if you guys found alt accounts in the same campaign we can give them a negative trust for being abuser and cheater on the campaign.