Maybe she isn't stupid and the attack went a bit over your head. Take some more time to think about the name of the account that posted the image, the content of their post, and who the democrat in the picture is then check back with me here.
Make sure you read the fine print of the question they asked.
"Some members of Congress are proposing a “Green New Deal” for the U.S. They say that a Green New Deal will produce jobs and strengthen America’s economy by accelerating the transition from fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy. The Deal would generate 100% of the nation’s electricity from clean, renewable sources within the next 10 years; upgrade the nation’s energy grid, buildings, and transportation infrastructure; increase energy efficiency; invest in green technology research and development; and provide training for jobs in the new green economy. How much do you support or oppose this idea?"
Oh that's right, the question was phrased in such a way as to create the pretense that it is a given this plan is viable and nothing more given. Additionally from your own report you will see the majority of the 966 respondents have never heard of the deal, which means no one had any idea what they were saying yes to.
Thats the point. The question asks is what the Green new deal is and everyone likes it because "people like nice things" and it is only nice things. Then, when they "learn" what it "really is" from Sean Hannity, they hate it because of the lies that it bans meat, cars, and airplanes.
Moral of the story is that spreading misinformation about a piece of legislation is actually an affective strategy that can turn something almost everyone supports into a "controversy".
