Shalecoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2019, 04:13:58 PM Last edit: June 03, 2019, 03:19:47 PM by Shalecoin |
|
Definition of "shalecoin":
Mined coins with no access to the address. (Nobody has the privatekey)
If that address is a coinbase address: 1 year after mining Other addresses: 10 years after last output transaction (If there is no output transaction then 10 years after first input transaction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Shalecoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2019, 04:23:13 PM |
|
"Don't send to 1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE. These coins are lost."
One day computers will be able to hash the privatekey for this address or for addresses with no access to it. Therefore coins should be removed after mining from the coinbase address to show that someone has access to it. Otherwise they are shalecoins waiting to be "remined" or "fracked" one day.
|
|
|
|
WebCoinInfo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2019, 04:29:18 PM |
|
"shalecoin ASIC":
ASIC to "frack" shalecoins. (Get the privatekey)
|
|
|
|
ABCbits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7463
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
"Don't send to 1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE. These coins are lost."
One day computers will be able to hash the privatekey for this address or for addresses with no access to it. Therefore coins should be removed after mining from the coinbase address to show that someone has access to it. Otherwise they are shalecoins waiting to be "remined" or "fracked" one day.
That's not how it works, you generate public key (using ECDSA.secp256k1) from private key then perform RIPEMD-160 and SHA-256 Also, the only way to prove some has access to that address are by sign message or spend coins from that address. Even Quantum Computer won't able to obtain private key of that address because it's public key isn't known.
|
|
|
|
muslol67
|
|
April 21, 2019, 05:42:08 PM |
|
Even Quantum Computer won't able to obtain private key of that address because it's public key isn't known.
My biggest question this is. Really we can't? Even if this is not possible in today's technology, what will be the future? I think there should be some progress on this issue.
|
|
|
|
Haunebu
|
|
April 21, 2019, 06:00:18 PM |
|
Even Quantum Computer won't able to obtain private key of that address because it's public key isn't known.
My biggest question this is. Really we can't? Even if this is not possible in today's technology, what will be the future? I think there should be some progress on this issue. ETFBitcoin just mentioned that quantum computers themselves cannot crack the private key which is why I don't understand why you are confused here. People assume that sophisticated technology in the future can somehow crack these addresses, but it is clearly not that simple. Many BTC will stay lost forever unless someone finds a solution to this problem which is highly unlikely.
|
|
|
|
|
Shalecoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 04, 2019, 02:53:18 PM |
|
Coins with no access to the address. Nobody has the privatekey. Quote from: tacotime on April 14, 2013, 12:31:47 AM I think the likeliest scenario is that hundreds of people downloaded and ran the client then, got a bunch of blocks that were at the time useless because they were valueless, then deleted their client. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=175996.msg1834484#msg1834484
|
|
|
|
Shalecoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 04, 2019, 03:01:55 PM Last edit: May 06, 2019, 02:11:36 PM by Shalecoin |
|
The idea behind declaring coins as "shalecoin" is to indicate whether an address has a holder or not and therefore to have an open and clean blockchain. (Concerning longterm UTXO)
- As mentioned before - Definition of "shalecoin": Coins with no access to the address. (Nobody has the privatekey) If that address is a coinbase address: 1 year after mining Other addresses: 10 years after last output transaction
Longterm holders of coins should transfer their coins to a new address within 10 years, so they wouldn't become shalecoins. All other coins with no access to the address can't be transacted to a new address and will become shalecoins after 10 years / or after 1 year if it's a coinbase address. Owners of possible computers with the ability to "hash" the privatekey would use these computers only for shalecoins. (Coins with no holder)
|
|
|
|
Ailmand
|
|
May 04, 2019, 03:07:56 PM |
|
The idea behind declaring coins as "shalecoin" is to indicate whether an address has an holder or not and therefore to have an open and clean blockchain. (Concerning longterm UTXO)
- As mentioned before - Definition of "shalecoin": Coins with no access to the address. (Nobody has the privatekey) If that address is a coinbase address: 1 year after mining Other addresses: 10 years after last output transaction
Longterm holders of coins should transfer their coins to a new address within 10 years, so they wouldn't become shalecoins. All other coins with no access to the address can't be transacted to a new address and will become shalecoins after 10 years / or after 1 year if it's a coinbase address. Owners of possible computers with the ability to "hash" the privatekey would use these computers only for shalecoins. (Coins with no holder)
Then what would happen to shale coins? So, it will require holders to move or make transactions on their wallet for their coin not be considered in active?
|
|
|
|
Shalecoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
May 06, 2019, 02:20:02 PM |
|
Through transactions within that timeframe holders indicate that their coins are not shalecoins. The owners of these special computers will only hash privatekeys of shalecoins (coins with no holder) and bring them back to the blockchain as usable coins. They will transfer them to their own addresses. Without that shalecoin declaration they could not know which coins have holders and which not.
Fairplay for both sides (holders of coins and owners of special computers)
|
|
|
|
bitmover
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 5917
bitcoindata.science
|
|
May 06, 2019, 07:49:18 PM |
|
My biggest question this is. Really we can't? Even if this is not possible in today's technology, what will be the future? I think there should be some progress on this issue.
That´s not how it works. You know the public address, not the public key. It´s a matter of processing power. It is not possible mathematically to break a privatekey without a public key.
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
qubitasic
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 1
|
|
May 07, 2019, 01:29:49 PM |
|
Shalecoin 'fracking' is the next challenge.
|
|
|
|
qubitasic
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 1
|
|
May 13, 2019, 03:07:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
qubitasic
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 1
|
|
May 13, 2019, 03:39:52 PM |
|
Shalecoin 'fracking' is the next challenge.
Shalecoins have no owners and can't be moved. These coins will be 'fracked'.
|
|
|
|
qubitasic
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 1
|
|
May 21, 2019, 01:31:00 PM |
|
According to the definition all addresses with no outgoing transactions or last outgoing transactions older than May 2009 are shalecoin addresses. And all coinbase addresses older than May 2018. These are addresses with no holders.
|
|
|
|
qubitasic
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 1
|
|
May 22, 2019, 02:37:16 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
qubitasic
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 1
|
|
May 31, 2019, 02:28:13 PM Last edit: May 31, 2019, 03:29:55 PM by qubitasic |
|
|
|
|
|
qubitasic
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 1
|
I think it's fair to say that Bitcoin as it exists today is not quantum secure, period. Pieter Wuille https://twitter.com/jb55/status/11335330681976750101. The first owners of possible computers with the ability to 'frack' the privatekey will use these computers only for shalecoins. (Coins with no holder) 2. Bitcoin will get an update. (QC secure) 3. In the meantime all owners can transact their coins to these new addresses. 4. Then there will be other QC owners who will 'frack' all remaining coins. - As mentioned before - Definition of "shalecoin": Coins with no access to the address. (Nobody has the privatekey) If that address is a coinbase address: 1 year after mining Other addresses: 10 years after last output transaction (If there is no output transaction then 10 years after first input transaction)
Longterm holders of coins should transfer their coins to a new address within 10 years, so they wouldn't become shalecoins. All other coins with no access to the address can't be transacted to a new address and will become shalecoins after 10 years / or after 1 year if it's a coinbase address. Owners of possible computers with the ability to "hash" the privatekey would use these computers only for shalecoins. (Coins with no holder)
|
|
|
|
|