THEYMOS, CYRUS, COBRA - RED TRUST THE SCAMMERS NEW WEAPON

[The-One-Above-All]

Local rules - only the most senior admin may comment on this thread.  

Only Cobra, Cyrus and Theymos may reply. Satoshi can chime in, if he feels strongly about the situation, which I expect he would.

Red trust is clearly being used by certain DT members as a weapon to silence whistle blowers and crush free speech here in general.

If anyone mentions the prior observable wrong doing of certain DT members they are immediately given red trust to silence them.
One needs to only say they will encourage others to review those DT's post histories and you will get red trust.
If one complains and tell the DT members they are not allowed to give red trust for presenting facts regarding them or their friends wrong doing. They they say " I can, I will, and I just have". Their abuse is brazen and open.

This is 100% perverting the very reason for having default trust.

I can bring clear observable evidence to demonstrate what I am claiming is true and taking place on this forum.

What are you going to do about this situation?  It seems a core of about 5 or 6 DT are doing this, but the entire DT system is full of others that will do NOTHING about this kind of abuse and will actually condone it.

There are numerous instances of clear double standards and corrupt behavior.

The implications for free speech here are quite bleak. It seems irresponsible to allow individuals that have been demonstrated untrustworthy on numerous occasions to be given leverage on this board to gain trust of the most vulnerable and silence any whistle blowers. Since their past untrustworthy behaviors are clearly observable there can be no sensible and responsible reason to let them continue in these positions of trust that leaves the entire board vulnerable to their actions.

Why are these people not blacklisted from the trust system?

At the very least bring them in line with a clear RULE. Red trust to be issued for proven scams and scammers or those you can present a STRONG case are about to scam or have scammed. All other red trust must be removed and those breaking this rule will be black listed?

What is so difficult about issuing this command to save the board from this abusive and corrupt bunch of DT members that have grasped control of the trust system?

Other members seem to have recognized this a while back

but this latest drama with Lauda has opened my eyes a bit...

Yeah, I've distanced myself with her.  What can you do?  You speak out and you get negative trust...

How do I defriend Lauda without getting negative trust from her and ruining five years?

Do you think it’s acceptable that Lauda hasn’t tagged aTriz yet? Do you think there is any reason why everyone shouldn’t tag aTriz for what he did?

Let me answer that this way - how can I leave negative trust for either of them without ruining my account?

As for your account being ruined if you tag one of them, I’m well aware. I guess the difference is that I do what I feel is right regardless of how it may effect me, and you appear to be having your true opinions silenced out of fear. So forgive me if I take your criticisms with a grain of salt.

[1715660490]

1715660490

[1715660490]

1715660490

[1715660490]

1715660490

[CryptopreneurBrainboss]

If you don't want other forum members responding to the thread then you should have sent them individual PMs, PASS

[The-One-Above-All]

If you don't want other forum members responding to the thread then you should have sent them individual PMs, PASS

If your post is not deleted then there should be a good explanation of why. I notice other persons (not DT members) not complying with the local rules are deleted. I am reporting it now. I will see what happens.

Please stop spamming your signature at every given chance. Or remove it. All of these huge mixing, gambling sigs in meta that are being worn by the DT members are blinding.

[mikeywith]

Since this seems to be an experiment week, i assume you trying to figure out whether or not a post like this will be deleted.

Why start a whole thread to discuss only with 4 members whom one is not an admin, another one invented btc and left ( probably won't come back only to read your b.s) and the other two are  probably too busy to reply you, whatever is it you smoking is killing the last bits of brains cells on you.

[yazher]

If you don't have something good to say, You better remain silent or go somewhere else with your Dog. 

[SaltySpitoon]

-snip-
At the very least bring them in line with a clear RULE. Red trust to be issued for proven scams and scammers or those you can present a STRONG case are about to scam or have scammed. All other red trust must be removed and those breaking this rule will be black listed?

What is so difficult about issuing this command to save the board from this abusive and corrupt bunch of DT members that have grasped control of the trust system?

Its been discussed ad nauseam. There aren't any intentions on forcing people to adhere to a standard set of rules for who you can or can't find suspicious. People have differences of opinions on what constitutes being red trust worthy. If someone makes a bad judgement call, then people will disregard their feedback. If that person has a history of poor quality feedback, they end up removed from DT.

Anyway, local rules aren't absolute. You can use them to tell individual people that are harassing that they aren't allowed to post, but if you say that no one with a S, T, X, or Z in their username may post in my threads, the moderators won't help you out.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Its been discussed ad nauseam.

Yes, and that's because of all the threads cryptohunter started and all of the other ones he's posted in.  And now it appears he's at it again with a new account, rehashing the same old shit and thinking a new account with an unsullied reputation will convince everyone that the same BS arguments have any validity.

Don't be fooled.  Put OP on ignore just like I suggested everyone put cryptohunter on ignore, else it's going to be the same growing snowball of nonsense that the forum has already been hit with since this past December or so.

[Foxpup]

It seems a core of about 5 or 6 DT are doing this, but the entire DT system is full of others that will do NOTHING about this kind of abuse and will actually condone it.

Would it be optimistic to ask for a list of names, or are you just going to continue ranting vaguely?

[Lauda]

It seems a core of about 5 or 6 DT are doing this, but the entire DT system is full of others that will do NOTHING about this kind of abuse and will actually condone it.

Would it be optimistic to ask for a list of names, or are you just going to continue ranting vaguely?

Me, pick me! 

[The-One-Above-All]

Since this seems to be an experiment week, i assume you trying to figure out whether or not a post like this will be deleted.

Why start a whole thread to discuss only with 4 members whom one is not an admin, another one invented btc and left ( probably won't come back only to read your b.s) and the other two are  probably too busy to reply you, whatever is it you smoking is killing the last bits of brains cells on you.

This is turning out to be another great thread.

This newbie just turned into another chipmixer shill and sig spammer . Has no clue how the trust and merits systems operate or their implications for free speech.

SS is here breaking my local rules. Creating extreme and silly straw men and insisting that leaving red trust for persons who say they like lemons is a legitimate use of the trust system.  Seems to be changing his opinion on local rules. I can't see how I can be any clearer. This is not people with x y z in their surname. This is a clear debate I wish to have with people (only)that can enforce some simple rules to prevent observable scammers and liars using red trust to silence whistle blowers who mention their previous untrustworthy deeds, and crushing the free speech of everyone else on this board. How long has SS been spamming gambling sigs? the same gambling project as the core scam team are wearing I notice?

The others breaking my local rules are known supporters of the very DT scamming abusers that I refer to, plus the observable liar, scammer, trust abuser, probable extortionist who also looks to have possibly misappropriated escrow funds he was entrust with. This person now in a position of trust on this board? great C.V.

All evidence in the form of observable events will provided, when the admin I permitted to post arrive to examine this claim.

[Foxpup]

A simple "yes" would have sufficed.

[TheNewAnon135246]

A simple "yes" would have sufficed.

Cryptohunter prefers to provide a 2000+ word reply and bore people to death.

[The-One-Above-All]

A simple "yes" would have sufficed.

Cryptohunter prefers to provide a 2000+ word reply and bore people to death.

This thread is like a honey pot for observable dirt bags and their supporters. This could work out very nicely.

Hi fortunejack spammer. Are you here to protect your scamming and lying pals too? I thought only Huge Black Woman AKA the smarmacist was dumb enough to be first to protect them on every thread. Great to see the other usual suspects all lining up to be demonstrably untrustworthy with them.

This thread is going to serve too many ends.

Nice to see you littering my thread off topic nonsense that will be deleted on the grounds of breaking my local rules and being off topic. Low value junk, like the rest of your low brow output from that last few years.

[monero.org]

If you will give red trust to those who joined the campaign, you can also leave negative to all including those exchanges that scammed and the ones that did an ICO who did a bounty campaign. ICOs are scams too in a way. Those EIO are scams in a way. Those users in the mixers campaign, do you think those MIXERS didn't make them accomplices to crimes?

 Why don't you just ask yobit to redefine their rules and just let them post 5 to the max per day or just 3 and not accept red trusted users.

Be reasonable here. the forum is going good. if you don't wanna battle the spam,  just take out and DISALLOW SIGNATURES AND LETS SEE WHERE AND WHICH FORUM THE ADVERTISERS WILL GO.

[The-One-Above-All]

If you will give red trust to those who joined the campaign, you can also leave negative to all including those exchanges that scammed and the ones that did an ICO who did a bounty campaign. ICOs are scams too in a way. Those EIO are scams in a way. Those users in the mixers campaign, do you think those MIXERS didn't make them accomplices to crimes?

 Why don't you just ask yobit to redefine their rules and just let them post 5 to the max per day or just 3 and not accept red trusted users.

Be reasonable here. the forum is going good. if you don't wanna battle the spam,  just take out and DISALLOW SIGNATURES AND LETS SEE WHERE AND WHICH FORUM THE ADVERTISERS WILL GO.

Did you post this in the wrong thread? please delete it and put it in the correct thread.

[tranthidung]

There is no Yobit supporters appeared here, so far, looks a 'good topic'.  You should add one more rule into your local rule list:

• Yobit supporters can not join here. If posts made here, OP will delete it all.

[The-One-Above-All]

There is no Yobit supporters appeared here, so far, looks a 'good topic'.  You should add one more rule into your local rule list:

• Yobit supporters can not join here. If posts made here, OP will delete it all.

Well unless cobra, theymos or cyrus are spamming yobit sigs or pumping yobit, then I think it is safe to leave the OP as it is. Also for your information you can not adapt local rules after the intial post is submitted.

[coinlocket$]

Its been discussed ad nauseam.

Yes, and that's because of all the threads cryptohunter started and all of the other ones he's posted in.  And now it appears he's at it again with a new account, rehashing the same old shit and thinking a new account with an unsullied reputation will convince everyone that the same BS arguments have any validity.

Don't be fooled.  Put OP on ignore just like I suggested everyone put cryptohunter on ignore, else it's going to be the same growing snowball of nonsense that the forum has already been hit with since this past December or so.

Probably he got a temp ban and he is avoiding the ban with an alt account? (It's unlikely that he is offline for 10+days with the spamming posting he was doing)

Hard to tell, maybe mods can check if is he temp banned, BPIP doesn't track them.
This account seems to have the same stylish of posts and post against the same people as nutildah.

[The-One-Above-All]

Its been discussed ad nauseam.

Yes, and that's because of all the threads cryptohunter started and all of the other ones he's posted in.  And now it appears he's at it again with a new account, rehashing the same old shit and thinking a new account with an unsullied reputation will convince everyone that the same BS arguments have any validity.

Don't be fooled.  Put OP on ignore just like I suggested everyone put cryptohunter on ignore, else it's going to be the same growing snowball of nonsense that the forum has already been hit with since this past December or so.

Probably he got a temp ban and he is avoiding the ban with an alt account? Hard to tell, maybe mods can check if he temp banned BPIP don't track them.

This account seems to have the same stylish of posts and post against the same people as nulitad.

Nulitad? do you mean that scam enabling account seller DT member Nutildah?


Off topic. irrelevant nobody newbie sig spamming troll coinlocket$. Why are you mentioning the account seller and scam enabling member Nutildah on my thread? I am surely not a scam enabler like them. Please do not make such accusations.

 Please take heed of my local rules. I do not think your broken down 3rd world grasp of the English language can be taken as conclusive analysis of identical post styles. Although, we have already stated we are doing our "uttermost" to post in a style that the true legend would recognize as his own impressive and comprehensive presentation whilst he for whatever reason is prevented from continuing his fight for fair and equal treatment for all members.

This derailing must stop, or mods must be held accountable for allowing it to continue. I will be report all posts not made by those we specifically permitted in the initial post.

[coinlocket$]

Why are you mentioning the account seller and scam enabling member Nutildah on my thread?

You talk a lot about him, you must have a crush on him like your "friend" cryptohunter".

Off topic. irrelevant nobody newbie sig spamming troll coinlocket$.

Use your brain if you have one, my signature do not pay for posting on meta so you can accuse for everything but not for the signature spamming.


Report my post as offtopic then.
Let's play this game, reporting you as probable alt of cryptohunter.
If you are right, my post will be deleted, if I'm right and cryptohunter is temp banned (most likely since he is offline for 10 days) and you are his alt, you and your main account will be permabanned for ban evading.

Edit, if you are faking a temp ban, chapeau.