Red Trusted Managers Don't Accept Red Trusted Participants

[Byakuga]

Im fine with bounty managers with red trust but devs should not give red trust bounty managers projects to manage for them because it can stain the projects reputation too but for me i will like to check why the bounty manager have red trust because we have many reasons why someone gets red trust.

[1714887298]

1714887298

[1714887298]

1714887298

[1714887298]

1714887298

[Periodik]

Isn't it unfair?

Most of the bounty managers has red trust but they never accept red trusted participants mostly on their signature campaign. If ico making this decision so why are they hiring a red trusted manager?

Everything falls on the developer teams themselves. At the end of the day, the decision will be theirs to make. If they give paramount importance to their brand, they should try to avoid managers with red trust and promoters with red trust as well. This is very basic here, at least on this forum.

[Ibizugbe1]

Some mangers have been given red trust when project team changed the terms of bounty engagement, and for not doing a good research before accepting to manage a bad project. If a BM is good at the job, I vote it should be given the bounty management regardless of the red trust. Although I personally avoid red trust manager. I fear the project might fail or hunters will run into problem.

[aioc]

Isn't it unfair?

Most of the bounty managers has red trust but they never accept red trusted participants mostly on their signature campaign. If ico making this decision so why are they hiring a red trusted manager?

If the red trust of the bounty manager comes from DT1 or DT2 then it's cast to his credibility as a bounty manager, and if the red trust has something to do on how he did his campaign, then we should stay away with that kind of manager, some red trust are not worth it, some of them are fake just to get revenge.

[suryapro]

If a bounty manager who owns Redtrust and holds a signature campaign and forbid a participant who also has Redtrust, I think it's only natural. because he was in charge of this bounty manager's campaign. and he has the right to determine the rules and who has the right to participate in the signature campaign he held.

[dcomomal]

It is very unfair, because if you was marked as a red trusted member, how you can require normal trust rating from your participants. Be honest with hunters and accept negatives as well, because as we all know, it is very easy to get marked on Bitcointalk.

[Ferris419]

There has a reason for every red trust. If it relates any kind of cheating, scamming, multiple activities in bounties then bounty manager can easily reject them! For example, Wapinter is red trust tagged bounty manager but there is no doubt that he is a reputed bounty manager and he is running many bounties successfully. But you will find in his every bounty that red trust people are not allowed! It is because they can cheat again, or the ICO owner doesn't allow this, but yet they hired wapinter because he has many successful campaigns, he has an active community and for others reason!

[martina14]

Most bounty managers now are accepting red trusted participants but it depends on the reason why they get the red flag.
This is much better than before which you can't join most of the campaigns once you are marked red.

[rodel caling]

Isn't it unfair?

Most of the bounty managers has red trust but they never accept red trusted participants mostly on their signature campaign. If ico making this decision so why are they hiring a red trusted manager?

Yeah it's unfair but We need to accept the reality, we can't command the choices of the project owner who manager they want to handle of their project to advertise.

There has a reason for every red trust. If it relates any kind of cheating, scamming, multiple activities in bounties then bounty manager can easily reject them! For example, Wapinter is red trust tagged bounty manager but there is no doubt that he is a reputed bounty manager and he is running many bounties successfully. But you will find in his every bounty that red trust people are not allowed! It is because they can cheat again, or the ICO owner doesn't allow this, but yet they hired wapinter because he has many successful campaigns, he has an active community and for others reason!

Agreed some of the manager they get red trust because didn't pay to participant for their participation, but we can't force ut because simetimes manager is also a victim of the fake project.

[Ferris419]

Most bounty managers now are accepting red trusted participants but it depends on the reason why they get the red flag.
This is much better than before which you can't join most of the campaigns once you are marked red.

Yes, you are right. After the new color in red trust accounts, most of the bounty managers are accepting them. Personally, I think this is a good move, they are getting the second chance to be loyal and real! Crypto needs supporters, only red color can't stop many people! Though we have to be strict against scammer.s.

[letyouearn]

Isn't it unfair?

Most of the bounty managers has red trust but they never accept red trusted participants mostly on their signature campaign. If ico making this decision so why are they hiring a red trusted manager?

Well, because ICO team doesn't care about bounty manager's trust, they may be totally unaware of this feature
And bounty manager is professional here and he knows the rules. And he sets such a requirements in his campaign, because he thinks that this is important.

[ene1980]

Isn't it unfair?
Most of the bounty managers has red trust but they never accept red trusted participants mostly on their signature campaign. If ico making this decision so why are they hiring a red trusted manager?

The managers that got red trust for a reason and if they are promoting any project why would anyone join their campaign to begin with, we have already seen a ton of scam projects that were promoted in this forum and if a project manager is involved in any of these promotions in the past how would you trust them and waste your time promoting a project that would end up scamming people. It is better to avoid promoting these dubious projects and that will help in reducing the scams in the ICO market.

[blackhawkeye1912]

Yes, I thought so. If the bounty manager does have red trust on his profile, then he should have accepted red trust participants because they fall on the same category. It seems unfair, but that how it is. We cannot do about it. Anyway, there is a lot of bounty campaigns that accepts everybody.

[lillobo]

Red trust members are mostly not allowed to participate in signature campaigns. But they can participate in other campaigns without any problem. The main reason why bounty managers dont accept red trust members is because they believe it will affect the brand value.

[sheba]

They are the one that manage the campaign so they should be the one to accept a participant or not whether they have red trust on their own. You can find any project that accepts red trust but I don't think they are reliable projects.

[kalstarzz]

yeah right, this sounds pretty weird and unfair. I am also not sure they did not accept participants with the red trust as an association of the project TEAM, but only the rules of the bounty manager. I think this needs correction.

[X-ray]

It is very unfair, because if you was marked as a red trusted member, how you can require normal trust rating from your participants. Be honest with hunters and accept negatives as well, because as we all know, it is very easy to get marked on Bitcointalk.

Even when it was getting red marked and then that's still fair consider about the bounty managers are only running what already ordered by the team. Remember this any bounty campaign will put the rules of the team or bounty campaign can add or change the rules anytime.
This is the bounty participant's risk.
But the red trust of bounty manager gives bad credibility for ico or bounty campaign.

[Marble777]

it depends on how the manager previously managed the project if they get red trust over and over again of course they have a bad reputation, but I see not all projects can accept managers and participants with red trust, but the point is if the project is really legitimate it will not accept managers or participants with red trust.

[furball64]

Absolutely true, there are some projects that has a bounty manager with red trust, and there some reasons why they have that red trust. They don’t accept red trust participants because they implementing rules and regulations of the project, and also if they accept the red trust it brings a bad image for their projects.

Pay attention to what is written in the red trust. I will not say that someone is abusing these inscriptions, but sometimes they do not refer to abuses during bounty campaigns or other economic frauds.

[Bitze]

Isn't it unfair?

Most of the bounty managers has red trust but they never accept red trusted participants mostly on their signature campaign. If ico making this decision so why are they hiring a red trusted manager?

one doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the other.
there are also bounty managers who have been badly rated for decisions made by the team.
the manager has no influence on that but is liable for it. so the 2 topics must not be mixed.