Mass BSV delisting from the top exchanges is not totally justified in my opinio

[leech.]

Well, I understand that after Kraken has launched a poll and 71 percent of users voted for delisting BSV from the exchange, they decided to delist it. Earlier Binance delisted it too.

But isn’t it too much? Take into account the remaining coin holders, even if there is only 29 percent of them. What should they do? For me as a BSV holder it didn’t look quite fair. I didn’t hold much, but I’d still prefer to have it for the future. Now I had to transfer it to freewallet and I’m still searching for other services to hold it...

Imagine if all the Hillary supporters would have to leave the country after Trump won. This is inadequately hard decision.

You do not ban currency just because of its stupid founders who make idiotic statements. Think about people.

Also I’ll be glad if you name some other services where they still have BSV.

[1714764389]

1714764389

[1714764389]

1714764389

[coco23]

You do not ban currency just because of its stupid founders who make idiotic statements. Think about people.

Personally I have never used BSV or followed its story. I do own some due to the forks, but I have never tried to move them.

However, I find the procedure questionable to have a poll whether to delist a coin or not. An exchange should look at the actual demand (and if too low delist). I don't know how much trading volume BSV had, maybe it was too low? Kraken is not known for having many alts...

Apart from that there are probably enough exchanges where you can still trade. If BSV is such a popular coin than exchanges would only hurt themselves if not. But my guess is that most BTC clones are not really that popular and will dissappear soon...

[wedosgibas]

-snip-
You do not ban currency just because of its stupid founders who make idiotic statements. Think about people.
Also I’ll be glad if you name some other services where they still have BSV.

A person's statement is a mirror of himself, the same thing happens in BSV. Why defend coin with stupid founder? As you said above. Because it has damaged image or reputation of the community. Instead of a large community.

[Mianae]

Well, I understand that after Kraken has launched a poll and 71 percent of users voted for delisting BSV from the exchange, they decided to delist it. Earlier Binance delisted it too.

But isn’t it too much? Take into account the remaining coin holders, even if there is only 29 percent of them. What should they do? For me as a BSV holder it didn’t look quite fair. I didn’t hold much, but I’d still prefer to have it for the future. Now I had to transfer it to freewallet and I’m still searching for other services to hold it...

Imagine if all the Hillary supporters would have to leave the country after Trump won. This is inadequately hard decision.

You do not ban currency just because of its stupid founders who make idiotic statements. Think about people.

Also I’ll be glad if you name some other services where they still have BSV.

Before a coin gets delisted, don't the exchange give reasons why it's being delisted. Bsv delisting started with Binance I feel it's more a crypto cold war than normal. There shouldn't have been a chain split at the first place but forks have happened in other projects I don't see why Bsv should be delisted from exchange.

[mindrust]

If you are still hodling that shitcoin you deserve to lose money.

There is no other explanation can be made. It is a shitcoin, it shouldn't have any real world value, its main promoter is a scam artist and worst of all, that scam artist is suing everybody who says that he is a scam artist.

Fuck Craig and his shitcoin. BCH is next.

[Herbert2020]

Take into account the remaining coin holders, even if there is only 29 percent of them. What should they do?

that is the risk they should have knowingly took when they decided to invest in a centralized shitcoin abusing the name of bitcoin and scamming people while doing it.

You do not ban currency just because of its stupid founders who make idiotic statements. Think about people.

well centralized altcoins are defined by their founders!

as a matter of fact these exchanges should not have been greedy enough in first place to add this useless altcoin to their platform the day it was released instead of now thinking about removing it.

[green547]

If you are still hodling that shitcoin you deserve to lose money.

There is no other explanation can be made. It is a shitcoin, it shouldn't have any real world value, its main promoter is a scam artist and worst of all, that scam artist is suing everybody who says that he is a scam artist.

Fuck Craig and his shitcoin. BCH is next.

Dude I'm not a fan of SV but I wouldn't call it a shitcoin.  Millions of dollars of SV are traded daily and they have very wealthy people backing the development.  What you said just isn't fair man.  And BCH is a top 5 coin so calling that a shitcoin is just pure FUD.

[Herbert2020]

If you are still hodling that shitcoin you deserve to lose money.

There is no other explanation can be made. It is a shitcoin, it shouldn't have any real world value, its main promoter is a scam artist and worst of all, that scam artist is suing everybody who says that he is a scam artist.

Fuck Craig and his shitcoin. BCH is next.

Dude I'm not a fan of SV but I wouldn't call it a shitcoin.  Millions of dollars of SV are traded daily and they have very wealthy people backing the development.  What you said just isn't fair man.  And BCH is a top 5 coin so calling that a shitcoin is just pure FUD.

having a high volume or even a high market capitalization doesn't make a coin magically good!
any shitcoin that can get pumped will have a high volume and a high market capitalization.

what makes a coin good is its utilities and most importantly its innovations. all these fork coins did was copy bitcoin! that makes them a shitcoin. additionally they have the disadvantage of using bitcoin's name and blockchain which makes them even bigger shitcions because a real project will always start from scratch instead of abusing the "fame" of another project.

[flash101k]

Take into account the remaining coin holders, even if there is only 29 percent of them. What should they do?

that is the risk they should have knowingly took when they decided to invest in a centralized shitcoin abusing the name of bitcoin and scamming people while doing it.

Through Hard fork taking advantage of the popularity of Bitcoin to create that Altcoin at high prices is one of the stupid things. Developers only create FOMO to be able to earn profits based on its popularity. You're stupid to believe what they say so accept this rejection because this is a good choice to remove shitcoin.

[NeuroticFish]

Dude I'm not a fan of SV but I wouldn't call it a shitcoin.  Millions of dollars of SV are traded daily and they have very wealthy people backing the development.  What you said just isn't fair man.  And BCH is a top 5 coin so calling that a shitcoin is just pure FUD.

Bcash and bsv were both born as the "true Bitcoin", "Satoshi vision" (lol!) and so on.
Weren't they the ones continuously FUD-ing?
Weren't they the ones continuously saying that Bitcoin is shitcoin?
Weren't they the ones continuously telling that Bitcoin transaction fees are high?
Why did they get Bitcoin name in their name? Why not CSW Coin?
Why all this "I am Satoshi" drama when he cannot prove it?

Ah, some fools were caught by greed and "invested" into this pure speculative (forked!) coin with no substance? Well, too bad. "Never invest what you cannot afford to lose".

[fallensky7]

In my opinion, a bad creator cannot have a good brainchild! The exchanges went in the right direction. They supported the community in the person of the people Craig opened the hunt for. Such people should be beaten in their pocket!
OKEx seems to have refused to delist BSV

[amrulshare]

so far I have never traded or interacted with this coin. Furthermore, they do not respect the community and are stubborn to get personal benefits. I appreciate every exchange that delinquates on coins that has a level of arrogance and manipulation that they are the best.

[Indrawan77]

Well the exchanges delist it because there is not enough transaction volume, and its only being delisted not being banned forever, you can start your own campaign to attract more users, when people see it's useful and the transaction volume is enough then the exchanges will accept it back, but for now most of us knows that BSV performance is really bad and the support is low

[rijaljun]

If you buy a stock, you must be supporting them and hope them succeed and the you can have a good return. It's the same, you buy crypto that you support the team to do something good and hope you can have a good return. It is nothing wrong, you just need to be more careful in what you are supporting.

[Shatterlean22]

Yes been able to delist coins from exchanges because  of one statement is cruel, bitcoinSV deserves a chance at least even if it won't do well on the long run,i feels like power struggle is in crypto space  now

[sandra_x]

Craig Wright ,founder of BSV commuted a "treasonable" offence by calling our dear bitcoin fraud,claiming to be Satoshi, attacking those who pointed out his errors and trying to usurp his authority over everyone, dividing the community. All in an attempt to promote his business coins.We are satoshis and we protect bitcoins.

[dark08]

This is deserve for BSV to delist in top exchange site why? Because Craig Wright claiming BSV as a true Bitcoin  if you hold BSV then sell it now while the price is in good condition because anytime it can be dump so hard and also one reason Wright claiming he is Satoshi Nakamoto haha what a sham for this person.

[bttmember]

Yes i agree with you as crypto is decentralized concept we should not let centralized decisions happen but at the same it it was vastly the fault of craig wright and his false claims to which the crypto market and community reacted strongly i still think that he should have apologized and closed the chapter but it did not happen unfortunately.

[ccsang]

that is exchange owner decision to delisting BSV and it's just because of founder statements, I'm not a BSV holder but I hate it because BSV hardfork lead to market crash in last year november, top 20 coin doesn't means anything, do you know bitconnect? It's a top 10 coins before with high daily trading volume, but it's still scam exit and become shitcoin. I'll sold all of my BSV if I were you, current situation is maybe other exchange will follow and delisting BSV too.

[edmundduke]

Well, I understand that after Kraken has launched a poll and 71 percent of users voted for delisting BSV from the exchange, they decided to delist it. Earlier Binance delisted it too.

But isn’t it too much? Take into account the remaining coin holders, even if there is only 29 percent of them. What should they do? For me as a BSV holder it didn’t look quite fair. I didn’t hold much, but I’d still prefer to have it for the future. Now I had to transfer it to freewallet and I’m still searching for other services to hold it...

Imagine if all the Hillary supporters would have to leave the country after Trump won. This is inadequately hard decision.

You do not ban currency just because of its stupid founders who make idiotic statements. Think about people.

Also I’ll be glad if you name some other services where they still have BSV.

It really comes down to what the exchanges want to do. The hing is, just because BSV exists doesnt mean that exchanges have to list it. Besides it looks like the volume on it wasnt good either, combine that with the optics of what the people "leading" have been doing and it suddenly makes sense.