Bye Bye abusive trustfeedback

[The-One-Above-All]

Not to mention those nice escrow and campaign manager jobs that often seem to go to DT members.

Also the ability to destroy your competition. Very useful.

[TMAN]

Also the ability to destroy your competition. Very useful.

ok ill bite here, name 2 cases of decent campaign managers that were destroyed by DT

[The-One-Above-All]

Also the ability to destroy your competition. Very useful.

ok ill bite here, name 2 cases of decent campaign managers that were destroyed by DT

Because you are too dull to comprehend what that statement means...

Every person who had a flawless rep had the ability to go for campaign manager, escrow of be part of a gambling or mixing sig campaign. Every legend that is suddenly given red for far less than what you and lauda are observably guilty of is reducing competition for all of those positions. Does that help make sense of this very complex world into which you were unfairly thrust.

[TMAN]

Also the ability to destroy your competition. Very useful.

[TheNewAnon135246]

This forum is like Turkey, *If OP's opinion is true (I don't agree with him)

An elite group ''politicians'' (DT members) consistently accuses the majority of public (users) of being a terrorist/traitor (spammer)

All is about money/distribution of the wealth... as always

There is one person above all the most powerful/influential= theymos (RTE)

This makes no sense as there is no financial gain for being a DT member.

Just see your signature and many others DT members signatures and you will see the financial gains. 

Since when does wearing a signature require you to be a DT member? I'm getting paid the same amount as the rest of the participants.

[TheNewAnon135246]

This forum is like Turkey, *If OP's opinion is true (I don't agree with him)

An elite group ''politicians'' (DT members) consistently accuses the majority of public (users) of being a terrorist/traitor (spammer)

All is about money/distribution of the wealth... as always

There is one person above all the most powerful/influential= theymos (RTE)

This makes no sense as there is no financial gain for being a DT member.

Just see your signature and many others DT members signatures and you will see the financial gains. 

Since when does wearing a signature require you to be a DT member? I'm getting paid the same amount as the rest of the participants.

No, but Red trust do matter in joining a campaign. Many members of the forums including me have been given wrong Red Trust by DT and in some cases it rules out the competition.

Are you implying that some DT members are wrongfully giving people negative feedback to improve their odds at joining a signature campaign?

[suchmoon]

theymos took away the DT label from The Pharmacist

I don't think that making blatant nonsense up is going to help you in whatever vendetta you're involved in.

[The-One-Above-All]

This forum is like Turkey, *If OP's opinion is true (I don't agree with him)

An elite group ''politicians'' (DT members) consistently accuses the majority of public (users) of being a terrorist/traitor (spammer)

All is about money/distribution of the wealth... as always

There is one person above all the most powerful/influential= theymos (RTE)

This makes no sense as there is no financial gain for being a DT member.

Just see your signature and many others DT members signatures and you will see the financial gains. 

Since when does wearing a signature require you to be a DT member? I'm getting paid the same amount as the rest of the participants.

No, but Red trust do matter in joining a campaign. Many members of the forums including me have been given wrong Red Trust by DT and in some cases it rules out the competition.

Are you implying that some DT members are wrongfully giving people negative feedback to improve their odds at joining a signature campaign?

Are you claiming you can guarantee this does not or will not happen at any point?

[actmyname]

Are you claiming you can guarantee this does not or will not happen at any point?

Answering a question with another is rude.

TNA is not responsible for all of DT, which is fluid and changes on a monthly basis.
Let us assume that a user is wrongly tagging others.

They would surely be removed or at the very least have their feedback countered.^*

*given that we have awareness thereof

[Thule]

They would surely be removed or at the very least have their feedback countered.*

I don't see 6 negative feedbacks on my profile being countered where theymos made it very clear that giving negative trust for that is a clear abuse.


So where is your action ?

[TMAN]

They would surely be removed or at the very least have their feedback countered.*

I don't see 6 negative feedbacks on my profile being countered where theymos made it very clear that giving negative trust for that is a clear abuse.


So where is your action ?

Maybe theymos agrees that you were a waste of sperm? your mother should of swallowed instead of allowing your old man to jizz in her

[The-One-Above-All]

Are you claiming you can guarantee this does not or will not happen at any point?

Answering a question with another is rude.

TNA is not responsible for all of DT, which is fluid and changes on a monthly basis.
Let us assume that a user is wrongly tagging others.

They would surely be removed or at the very least have their feedback countered.^*

*given that we have awareness thereof

Rude you say? please take your council to Tman one comment above this if you want to demonstrate your are not clearly demonstrating double standards here. Then take a look through thenewnobodies previous attitude towards our own posts and again lecture him on being rude.

Actmyname is not responsible for all of DT and therefore can give no such guarantee. We see many wrongly applied tags that are not being countered.

What we do see is a lot of double standards and gaming of the current DT and merit systems.

[TMAN]

What we do see is a lot of double standards and gaming of the current DT and merit systems.

no double standards, DT's just dont act on the same level of cuntyness as you do CH, just use your original account - get banned and allow us all to move on

[The-One-Above-All]

What we do see is a lot of double standards and gaming of the current DT and merit systems.

no double standards, DT's just dont act on the same level of cuntyness as you do CH, just use your original account - get banned and allow us all to move on

that sounds rather rude?  actmyname, would you mind having a word with tman to demonstrate you wish to uphold the same standards for all members. 

Ban Ban Ban... the only false hope you have. You can not ban the truth TMAN. You can not ban observable instances. You can not ban new members presenting them. Why would anyone want to ban those that only ask for a set of transparent rules and guidelines that ALL members have to work within? why would they wish to prevent this?

[actmyname]

that sounds rather rude?  actmyname, would you mind having a word with tman to demonstrate you wish to uphold the same standards for all members.

Sure. TMAN is rude. This is a banal point, however: my remark was in relation to your deflection.

What we do see is a lot of double standards and gaming of the current DT and merit systems.

I care not about the one voicing concerns or points I disagree with. What I despise is when blanket statements are made when the impact thereof is significant.

[TMAN]

Sure. TMAN is rude.

No shit sherlock

[BitcoinSupremo]

I think that he means that being on DT has better chances to join a signature campaign rather than being on a negative trust feedback. It is as simple as that and I have nothing against it. It is just him that does not understand. I don't know what he wants to prove with these posts.

[josephdd1]

This forum is like Turkey, *If OP's opinion is true (I don't agree with him)

An elite group ''politicians'' (DT members) consistently accuses the majority of public (users) of being a terrorist/traitor (spammer)

All is about money/distribution of the wealth... as always

There is one person above all the most powerful/influential= theymos (RTE)

Thats the most absurd crap I've seen anyone write on this forum and I've seen a lot of crap.
DT membership is not a secret jerkoff club that's limited to someone, getting in it is fairly easy, but you must dedicate the time and effort along with the mental capacity to judge people.

I think that he means that being on DT has better chances to join a signature campaign rather than being on a negative trust feedback. It is as simple as that and I have nothing against it. It is just him that does not understand. I don't know what he wants to prove with these posts.

i don't think that is what is implied