Craig Wright sues a podcaster for saying Craight Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto

[wattcrypto]

I think once craig sends btc from the genesis block we can all be at peace and move on. until then he is a not who he claims to be

[1714930160]

1714930160

[1714930160]

1714930160

[1714930160]

1714930160

[1714930160]

1714930160

[1714930160]

1714930160

[1714930160]

1714930160

[STT]

Gag orders and injunctions are extremely common in europe where they're utilized to essentially strip freedom of speech from citizens.

Freedom of speech via comedy is protected going back centuries and is unlikely to be over turned by any court.  In that respect I suggest we keep any discussion of craig wright suitably comedic as he is a complete Muppet and not close to credible on any account I've read of his accomplishments.      Suing anyone makes zero sense except in the context he wants to keep being paid by various conferences for the inference he has some connection to the original protocol and obvious discussion otherwise is not profitable for him.

Why is he hungry for attention though? What does it gain him to get into all these fights?

It gains him what it didnt gain Satoshi Nakamoto, an audience of influence.    He needs to bang an empty drum because he has no ideas otherwise to fill it with

sends btc from the genesis block

I dont think anyone has the ability to do that anymore.   That was my theory anyway for some time, Satoshi Nakamoto went quiet to let his work speak for itself there on and I doubt that is reversed now

[Bonsaiav]

There have been many posts on this forum where people discussed governments and banks conspiring to kill bitcoin, ICOs and crypto. Perhaps in this news story, we are witnessing the reality of how this topic plays out in the real world. One interpretation says banks and governments prefer to seize control over bitcoin, ICOs and crypto utilizing charlatans and shills like Craig Wright who an uinformed public might be fooled into believing is the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

If it's true Craig Wright's the original Satoshi Nakamoto I think he will not insist in such a way only to defend BSV coins (as a coin that will kill bitcoin). Supposedly Craig Wright thinks healthy and focuses on the development and security of bitcoin only so that bitcoin has high competitiveness in the crypto market. If judged by Craig Wright's behavior which's still childish and only thinking of personal interests, I'm 100% sure that he's not Satoshi Nakamoto.

[bitbollo]

"we  are all Satoshi"

anyway this is an endless drama, also enough boring.
I can't understand why he continue to promote himself as Satoshi... ok BSV but this can't be the only reason.

[Xampeuu]

"we  are all Satoshi"

anyway this is an endless drama, also enough boring.
I can't understand why he continue to promote himself as Satoshi... ok BSV but this can't be the only reason.

I think the real satoshi will be silent and develop what he created. no need to promote yourself to get recognition from the world. it's true that this drama will never end, even though the original satoshi appears, people don't necessarily believe it

[pushups44]

Yes, the lawsuit has been filed in the UK where defamation lawsuits are easier to win than in the U.S., but I still think there will be obstacles for Craig Wright, especially if blockchain experts cast doubt on his claims. This can also backfire on him if he loses - it seems like a high-risk bet.

[Caladonian]

Yes, the lawsuit has been filed in the UK where defamation lawsuits are easier to win than in the U.S., but I still think there will be obstacles for Craig Wright, especially if blockchain experts cast doubt on his claims. This can also backfire on him if he loses - it seems like a high-risk bet.

As by doing this he will gained attentions once more, just like what he's getting now, claiming that he's Satoshi Nakamoto without proving anything, this saga will continue as the court will make some ruling out from here, every information about this trial will be forecast and for sure we will see more and more updates about this, and the beneficiaries will be him (Craig Wright), he will keeps getting the scene.

Whatever happened there, Craig claimed will still a big doubt for people who believes in anonymity.

[Netnox]

I would say that the best solution for us right now is to publicly declare Craig Wright as a loser and ignore him. Also, we should boycott any project in which he is playing a major role. I have a feeling that he is doing all this for some publicity. So in case he doesn't get what he wants, then there is chance that he'll keep his mouth shut and leave us in peace.

[el kaka22]

You can literally sue anyone you want, that is never really an important thing, I can sue anyone for saying I am not satoshi too but that doesn't mean I will win. Hell even in a world like crypto when a judge who doesn't have a clue of who is who and what satoshi nakomoto even means the judge could rule in favor of Craig and it still wouldn't mean anything at all.

Does he think if he wins this we will all go "well if the judge said so he must have provided some proofs" and suddenly start believing. Dude literally knows that there is one 100% sure thing he has to do to prove and he is not doing that so there is no point of believing he is working towards anything else. He literally showed his credit card purchase for bitcoin domain as a proof that he was the bitcoin creator, he thinks we are that stupid.

[smyslov]

One of the main reasons why Bitcoin SV is removed by Binance CEO. Craig Wright as we know claims that he is satoshi, however cannot prove it's claim. He has even started attacking people on twitter who keeps on saying he is not satoshi, I mean it is pointless, why would you even be butt-hurt if you haven't even proved that you are satoshi. Filing a case for because of it is getting way too far.

If he is Nakamoto then there is no need to sue people if they do not want to believe him, it is very uncharacteristic for the real Nakamoto to do that, he is not self centered like Wright, if Nakamoto wants to shout out that he created Bitcoin, he should have done that long ago, I believe that he is not Nakamoto.

[Vishnu.Reang]

Personally, i think this CSW issue is getting unnecessary attention in the space and it's preventing us from seeing the other bright side of the space.
Honestly speaking if Craig was to be the real satoshi, he wouldn't have planned to kill BTC in the first place. Even if it is his, we all together have taken it over from him. We gotta move on. He can't force us to adopt BSV. Crypto is about freedom lol

I was holding some BCH in my wallet, and therefore I received the forked coins a few months back. After Craig Wright sued the podcaster, I decided to get rid of the BSV coins in my wallet. So today I transferred all of my BSV to my Gate.io wallet and converted them to BTC. My only regret is that I could have got more BTC if I had done this a few weeks ago.

[suzanne5223]

I think once craig sends btc from the genesis block we can all be at peace and move on. until then he is a not who he claims to be

He's definitely not the real Satoshi cause the evidence he provided was not genuine and he's a kind of person that usually make false claim. Besides, he also claimed he designed the architecture for possibly the world first online casino which was implemented in the year 1999  so I'm not surprised with his false claim of been Satoshi.

[pinoycash]

I would say that the best solution for us right now is to publicly declare Craig Wright as a loser and ignore him. Also, we should boycott any project in which he is playing a major role. I have a feeling that he is doing all this for some publicity. So in case he doesn't get what he wants, then there is chance that he'll keep his mouth shut and leave us in peace.

It was nothing but a PR Stunt that cost him dearly, Losing Binance and kraken listing due to his goldlike attitude suing everyone that contradicts to his beliefs. Only a matter of time before he realized his mistake and apologize to the whole crypto community.

[posi]

Who cares? Why is everyone diverting unnecessary attention towards this dumbass anyway? He wants to shut everyone up who don't agree with his stupid claims.

The best solution in this case is to simply ignore him and not provide him the attention that he is desperate for. Truly embarrassing.

Bitcoin SV (  Rank 14 )

Market Cap: $1 027 107 917 USD

Who buys this altcoin? this is the problem of the crypto world and people like faketoshi have gained a lot of attention because he knows he has a group of people that he can manipulate easily. and this group of people are people who have hate bitcoin because of the way that bitcoin is going, something that should not happen, the community should be united.

I was also surprised either that the coin still maintain it spot on the capital but I'm the buyers and the investors of the coin are mainly newbies or Craig created a group which purpose are to manipulate the price of the coin. But, if we have more exchange delisting the coin some of it holder will quit.

[beerlover]

These guys are all confused human beings; I taught government said they are not in support of cryptocurrency legally, so why would craig then succeed in suing peters over the false claim, since the case has to do with the cryptocurrency, so I expect court to dismiss the case.

If he even succeed in shorting peter up, will he succeed also in shorting us up and letting the world know how terrible a liar he is, if he is really satoshi, then he doesn’t need court, he only needs a live feed to really proof himself to lots of technocrats out there who would understand him, otherwise, he might be smoking stuff that is turning hi thinking faculty upside down.

[magneto]

There have been many posts on this forum where people discussed governments and banks conspiring to kill bitcoin, ICOs and crypto. Perhaps in this news story, we are witnessing the reality of how this topic plays out in the real world. One interpretation says banks and governments prefer to seize control over bitcoin, ICOs and crypto utilizing charlatans and shills like Craig Wright who an uinformed public might be fooled into believing is the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

Here we have Craig Wright suing Peter McCormack for "defamation" as McCormack said Craig Wright isn't Satoshi on a pocast. In addition Craig Wright is attempting to file a gag order (see: injunction) against McCormack to prevent him from discussing this topic in the future. Gag orders and injunctions are extremely common in europe where they're utilized to essentially strip freedom of speech from citizens.

I don't see this as defamation whatsoever. He's expressing his own opinion.

There is simply not enough evidence to suggest that he is the creator of bitcoin anyways. You're right about people being potentially misled into thinking that Craig Wright is in fact Satoshi, given his media presence.

I think that it's important for everybody to realise bitcoin is not something that depends on the founder of it to run, like a corporation. It is decentralised for this exact reason, there is absolutely no need to know the identity of satoshi, and if there never comes undoubtable proof that someone is indeed satoshi, people shouldn't even care this much.

[nerlial]

God, when this is over. Even a child knows that any statement needs proof. If there is no evidence, no one will believe you. But he still does not quit.

[jak3]

Now that is cruel and stupid. I mean how can someone sue any person because he said something and as we know podcasters are there to say things which people want to hear. they can say anything which they believe that doesn't have to pass 100 tests before it can be podcast even media spreads rumors. I don't see how can people in that country have democratic rights. and why people want to people that they are real Satoshi, what will they even get from this action? they are not only going to get fame but also a lot of trouble too.

[Airbuxf]

OMG, Does anybody still listening or reading what Craig Wright is talking? I thought this case was closed long time ago if he didn't have any evidences that he is satoshi and tried to cheat people sending public adress to some random old wallet and telling that is a proof he is satoshi.

[nutildah]

There are still people who do supports this coin no matter what happen to CW.

Perhaps but I do not understand why. 90% of this coins market cap value rests in the idea that csw is Satoshi. If it is revealed he is not then it simply becomes yet another altcoin. For all intents and purposes it really is just another altcoin.