Are IEO's bad?

[Metall303]

Of course, placement on the exchange helps to raise more funds than the usual ICO, but it still does not give any guarantees that the project will be successful. you can simply take into account on the listing, but if the listing is on an unknown exchange, then there is no point in this. it's important to understand

[1715010319]

1715010319

[1715010319]

1715010319

[1715010319]

1715010319

[1715010319]

1715010319

[AjithBtc]

With IEO the chance of an investment going worthless has got very small possibilities, because lot of users have invested on projects that never gets listed to any of the exchanges even after waiting for much longer time period. Through IEO within few days after the launch can find the token for trading on the same exchange which is truly good.

[minersday]

In my opinion, I don't see anything wrong with IEOs. The principle and ideology behind IEO's operate similar like the escrow system or like the smart contract protocol. The exchange platform acts as the middle man or medium between the crypto project team and investors contributing to help support the project. When the project looks to be a potential scam project, the exchange platform will be able to freeze the funds raised and redistribute them back to the investors who contributed during the IEO.

[aizen10]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

That was I'm thinking too many investors are just focus on how they can earn money on IEO or ICO, they didn't look at the project and give some time make a research if thats project was good or not they are just blind on how much income they will have in the end of the day, people just want to have a money and go in the hype and nothing else for them profit is profit.

[Kelvinid]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

That was I'm thinking too many investors are just focus on how they can earn money on IEO or ICO, they didn't look at the project and give some time make a research if thats project was good or not they are just blind on how much income they will have in the end of the day, people just want to have a money and go in the hype and nothing else for them profit is profit.

It is pretty obvious that investors will just be focusing of what they'll probably be profiting but not to look for the success for that certain project.
We know ICO how it make crypto image ruins of having a lot of fake projects and yet, we can't justify how IEO works in the coming days, whether it can be the same of ICO or it could be more safe than of previous system. 

[shinratensei_]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

That was I'm thinking too many investors are just focus on how they can earn money on IEO or ICO, they didn't look at the project and give some time make a research if thats project was good or not they are just blind on how much income they will have in the end of the day, people just want to have a money and go in the hype and nothing else for them profit is profit.

In IEO the important thing that must be considered by them all is exchange site's hype. If that was listed on the exchange site and exchange site itself has created verification to that ico. But the hype from exchange site itself will determine does it worth a lot after listed and traded or not.

[sulis sudibyo]

nobody says IEO is bad. and you know everyone thinks the IEO is a new hope for investment in crypto. maybe there are some people who think the IEO will eventually suffer the same as ICO. but at least we can still trust the exchange that does the IEO. there are many quality exchanges providing IEO services such as Binance, Bittrex and others. we can trust an exchange like that.

[No Pain No blood]

IEO is not bad, because the IEO is a new hope for projects that want to find development funds. ICO is dead, and many think the new project will no longer be accepted. but with the IEO many investors have returned to believe in new projects. and I'm very happy with this, maybe the impact hasn't been felt. but for the long term this will greatly impact the price increase in the market

[gaj ahmada]

I still believe that there are still many good projects that will give everyone involved in it to make a profit without even having to provide proof that their coin has been registered or the project is running, I will continue to do this, not leave because I have not found a project registered and tradable

[allanr]

Good or bad quality of the IEO, depending on which exchanger is running it, a good project will choose good exchanger to boost their token sale. 

[pushups44]

They are neither good nor bad necessarily. Just because a token is listed on an exchange does not mean it's automatically worthy. The market has matured beyond the point of ranking tokens according to the exchanges that list then. Far more important are use cases and actual software development.

[Kaneki11]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

IEO are not bad in the sense that it helps it the legitimacy of the project developers.. but bad in the sense that it gives to much power to exchanges like binance.  Which are now trying to pose a crypto monopoly

[adterna]

I don't think the IEO or Initial Exchange Offering is bad, even I think now many are investing in the IEO compared to the ICO (Intial Coin Offering), because in ICO many projects are scam, some even run away with investor funds.

[Boombull]

You are saying the obvious truth. Why will someone even invest in an IEO on Yobit in the first place. Exchange matters when one wants to invest in IEO because there are some exchanges that lack credibility and project on exchanges like that will receive lesser support and interest from cryptocurrency community.

[Twinkledoe]

You are saying the obvious truth. Why will someone even invest in an IEO on Yobit in the first place. Exchange matters when one wants to invest in IEO because there are some exchanges that lack credibility and project on exchanges like that will receive lesser support and interest from cryptocurrency community.

Though one big consideration is the reputation of the exchange itself, still investors should look into the feasibility of the project. But many people are now blindly investing in some projects. They are looking more on the hype surrounding the project rather than the technology that it will deliver afterwards. After all, most of them are just for fast return of their investments. They are not worried about the deliverables of the project.

[Xalata]

IEOs are not bad but the reason why i think it's getting this name tag is because of how most people are losing money due to the recent ones being launched on Binance and some other exchange sites. Investors should not only be interested in pumps and dumps but should look at the project very carefully before investing into these IEOs that are being launched recently.

[khiholangkang]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

I think not, investors are not that stupid, just follow the IEO just because it is held in a well-known exchange, of course investors will also conduct prior research about the projects to be followed

[TopT3ns]

I think it can't be considered as bad thing. I mean, those exchanger must not stake their reputation for project that not good and only make investors lose. But actually this hype already influence people, that is why some IEO can be done and sold in a minute only.

[olamidey]

A lot of projects are going for IEO now. Easy access to funds without seemingly tedious regulations. Obviously it has now become a norm for most projects. Nevertheless, ICOs are still active . The major advantage of IEO is that the token gets listed on the exchange that it holds the fund raising. Apart from that, it's a sure way if raising funds. On the long run, it will have implications on the exchange and crypto world. If the exchange gets hacked, that's becomes a bigger problem.

[H1N1]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

Yeah, IEO will be depends on the exchange who holding it. The more reliable the exchange, the more can be trusted the IEO will.
No, IEO is actually not a bad thing to project. Holding IEO for your project can guarantee the listing on that exchange, so every
investors of the project know they will be able to trade their coin after IEO on that exchange.