Are IEO's bad?

[Ozero]

I do not think that IOO projects are bad. In any case, this is a temporary solution for a very bad situation with ICO projects. Fundraising and distribution of new tokens through the exchanges so far give good results in terms of improving the security of investments for investors. This is still the main question to ensure that this activity does not cease to exist. In the future, in any case, the situation will change.

[1715404570]

1715404570

[1715404570]

1715404570

[1715404570]

1715404570

[1715404570]

1715404570

[trash321]

The IEO process, which also has the shape of an ICO process, but for the time being I cannot say that there is clearly a big difference, so I can also assume that there are any opportunities to invest may not be crowned well.

[louisBSAS]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

I also think that new coins are growing in price not because of the prospects of the project itself, but because the exchange itself artificially creates an increase in the price of these coins. That is why many people do not care what a project is and they don’t even read information about it.
However, for those whose goal is to get a quick profit, this is a good investment option.

[siorapokk]

I agree with you and think that the real value of an ICO does not matter anymore. If an awesome project will hold an IEO on Yobit, it will not collect a third of those funds that a fraud project on Binance or Huobi will.

[Icologies]

what i know IEO is the solution to ICO, where ico is already bad in the eyes of investor , because the IEO project is a project that has been filtered in terms of quality by a large market, besides it, advantages of the IEO we don't need to wait for the market anymore, after the IEO project is finished we can sell on the market directly

[bitstalker]

For bad I haven't seen it, but maybe some IEOs are certainly bad, for example the IEO held by  launchpad that is not good enough / famous exchange but has a bad volume of trades in altcoin could have an impact on IEO project

[matveyeff]

I don't think IEO's are so bad. That's a good chance to launch a project in a weak market. In my opinion the main thing is that the exchanges do not let out a scam.

[nekonyun]

The current IEO is the best way for investors because currently many ICOs are failing, and investors are losing money. But the lack of IEO is not possible for long-term investment because after the altcoin from the IEO is launched prices will rise high and prices of dumps. and investor immediately left the altcoin. And the altcoin could have died because it had been abandoned by investors

[Denongels]

I don't really follow the IEO but there is a possibility that the IEO has a slight adverse effect because some IEOs are sometimes very fast to get ROI, but the problem is that after that what happens is just a dump, and maybe bad luck for those who buy when they reach ATH

[sieemma]

I think IEOs are quite better than icos in a sense that in ieos, the investors get their tokens on a well known exchange and further more,  they get listed in due time unlike in icos which can take more than 6 months before listing their coins on a shit exchange and more than a year to get a better exchange to list on.

Where u do your IEO determines the outcome of it and for now, we all know that ieos done on Binance are the best and most investors who get the chance to buy the coins are happy.

For me, I think an IEO is by far better than an ICO

[Bitmagister]

Actually I do not see a substantial improvement in the business model promoted by the ICOs, because in essence they are the same than before and the only thing they have modified is the means of financing. While they do not make a real effort to promote really innovative and useful projects there will be very little credibility in this type of business, which until now have only meant a source of wealth for developers, but not for investors.

[xOdiumNostrumx]

They are good when it comes to providing liquidity for projects, especially the lesser known ones. The ICO scene is pretty much still close to being dead, so IEOs give the smaller projects a much higher chance of being funded as well.

[daporivera]

Till this point, they are no known controversies about IEO projects for now. And I really hope it is been kept that way, since it is safe for all. Don't allow his scammers to come pollute IEO projects because, right now they are already setting up strategies to scam people of their hard earned money.

[mahibul49]

i think ieo is very good at least from icos.
at least low risk than icos now a days.buy from an exchange and trade in similiar exchage thats really great !and i can see big project is going for ieo.

[Ressurection]

Initial Exchange Offerings are not bad but because most of the projects that performed IEOs have either come to a stamd still or its token has reduced siggnificantly. This is why many crypto enthusiasts are raising claims that IEOs are bad.

[efxtrader]

Initial Exchange Offerings are not bad but because most of the projects that performed IEOs have either come to a stamd still or its token has reduced siggnificantly. This is why many crypto enthusiasts are raising claims that IEOs are bad.

I am agree, IEOs are not bad because exchanger already make research about the project prospect and make research about developers team. But its better to choose IEOs from big and reputable exchanger because big exchanger wont put their reputation on bad project

[duyduc256]

i think ieo is very good at least from icos.
at least low risk than icos now a days.buy from an exchange and trade in similiar exchage thats really great !and i can see big project is going for ieo.

IEO on big exchanges is the dream of many ICO projects that are on this market but to do that, the project will have to go through the testing process from their team. This is a huge obstacle and that helps us stay away from scam projects. I think the IEO is being considered a very interesting investment channel and if you are lucky, the profitability of 200% -300% is only a matter of time because the demand for investment in IEO is increasing and everyone wants to earn high profits

[yogeko]

I disagree with you. Just because a project is on Binance means nothing, except that it will be launched on one of the top exchanges. In fact, I don't like the due diligence process of Binance. The result is a project (I won't name) which they recently did an IEO, but it has nothing to show. The team was probably sharing some made up facts to Binance based on which they picked the project. This is from first-hand experience. I am with Farm2Kitchen, we are doing an IEO on ProBit. Our application is still pending on Binance. We were planning an ICO in Nov 2018, but we pulled out of it because of the bad market and instead we went to development with the seed funds and build a Marketplace that we launched last month. We build an app which is in Beta on Android. So we just did not quit because the ICO was pulled off, we carried on with the plans with whatever limited resources we had. Now we have a MVP to showcase and we are proud of the progress we have done with the resources. We are top rated on ICO Bench and ICO Marks (which to me does carry weight because of the due diligence they do). We are looking forward to a successful IEO so we can use the funds to develop the Blockchain network for traceability and market the platform across our primary market. So trust me my friend, not all IEOs are bad and being on Binance is not a validation.

[Sacramentus]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

IEO are not totally bad, I said so because investors might face some hiccups on some IEO offering. But so far I see it as a more better option than the ICO so I suggest you look at the positive side of the IEO which I believe is more than the negative

[sirohige]

My understanding for IEOs is basically instead of project handling raising funds etc. It will be for an exchange to do so.

An IEO hosted by Yobit or Binance can clearly not be compared. In other words, the exchange gives more credibility to the project regardless of whether it's worth it or not.

Am I the only one who thinks this is actually a bad thing and make people focus on the exchange hosting rather than the actual project and what the team is offering etc.?

IEO are not totally bad, I said so because investors might face some hiccups on some IEO offering. But so far I see it as a more better option than the ICO so I suggest you look at the positive side of the IEO which I believe is more than the negative

I think the IEO is the best fundraising method for now because when you saw some time ago you had a fundraising method using ICO and now there are many cases of ICO being used for fraud places so I think the IEO is now better.