Are IEO's bad?

[Dr.Osh]

There is a new round of development of the industry,which came to replace the ISO,as of course it will manifest itself not who will say,but one thing for sure that perhaps soon he will be popular,but can then also witiw past,time flies very fast

IEO no doubt is a bad thing for those who had been making money by scamming people on ICO back then. IEO right now is a lifesaver and has been a sign of success in the crypto space. All the good projects are launched on exchanges by conducting IEO. The best exchange would no doubt achieve their hard cap within minutes like Binance does. Try to target the best IEOs on the best exchange.

Yes you're right. IEO is even very good for those who want to take part in the project, but minimize the risk. I think the IEO is better than ICO, moreover when big markets accept them, it certainly has great trust.

[1714482960]

1714482960

[1714482960]

1714482960

[1714482960]

1714482960

[1714482960]

1714482960

[1714482960]

1714482960

[Maslate]

Yes you're right. IEO is even very good for those who want to take part in the project, but minimize the risk. I think the IEO is better than ICO, moreover when big markets accept them, it certainly has great trust.

True that IEO is good, but the big problem here is our capacity to participate in good project as it normally sold out easily.
If we cannot invest, we can only avail by buying it after the sale or when it's live in a certain exchange.

[antsam]

I think the IEO is one of the best crypto fund raising techniques at the moment, because there will be guaranteed coins or tokens to be listed in the exchange where the IEO is running. Investors will feel comfortable and safer with the IEO because there will be stricter selection for each IEO

[herfianto]

For me IEO is a new way for invest in the new crypto project. Especially the IEO at Binance Launchpad i am very like it. For me IEO is better than ICO and there will be no fraud.

[SomeCryptoDude]

IEO is definitely the way to go at this current point in time. STO's, yeah, you can. But ICO's is already a big no-no for me. IEO's provides much more security for the investors and so far everything looks good. I just participated in a project that sold out their private sales and their IEO in Bitforex. That goes to show that people are trusting IEOs now and feel confident about it.

[HodlerKing101]

IEO is definitely the way to go at this current point in time. STO's, yeah, you can. But ICO's is already a big no-no for me. IEO's provides much more security for the investors and so far everything looks good. I just participated in a project that sold out their private sales and their IEO in Bitforex. That goes to show that people are trusting IEOs now and feel confident about it.

The exchange does necessarily legitimize the IEO project by default. The differentiator between an IEO and an ICO is the safety of the investment process.

IEO is everything ICO should have been. Safer, more reliable, better controlled. There is no longer a need to sling your personal data at hundreds of different providers, hoping to gain "exclusive" access to an ICO.

[OTC]

No. I don't think IEOs are bad. We actually need IEOs at this time to curb the scam in ICOs since there are lot of scam in ICO now which is driving investors away from the crypto business.

[Chrystora123]

I saw that more than 100 new Exchanger issued coins (IEO) and many of the new Exchange is dead, no longer operating and even lost (the site was deleted), to be honest I'm very disappointed with this.  but there are still very profitable IEOs and not bad such as Binance which issues BNB, IDEX, and Yobit that are about to issue their own coins (IEO) soon.  IEOs from large exchanges have a greater chance of making a profit  

[mannybitcoins]

There is nothing that relates solely to good or bad. Yet it is multifaceted and depends solely on our vision.

[dainoran]

My view of the IEO is not bad, because of better security, to avoid scams, and secure investor investments. that in my opinion.

[nikola22]

there is no nothing bad in IEOs. it's a good way for the projects to raise money and for the investors to receive tokens of promising projects at low price.

[andrearz]

I think IEO is very good for short-term investments because every IEO is held, many IEOs are successful in a short time even before 1 month they are able to sell all coins. but, of course there are also some IEOs that I think are pretty bad.

[Fesatmas]

I think IEO is very good for short-term investments because every IEO is held, many IEOs are successful in a short time even before 1 month they are able to sell all coins. but, of course there are also some IEOs that I think are pretty bad.

A good IEO is that those in large exchanges such as Bittrex and Binance are always sold out in a short time, so if you want to really participate in investing in the IEO, then on that exchange is my advice.

[baeva2]

I think IEO is good and more reliable than ICO. In IEO there will be fewer scams. But I don’t like that in IEO only exchanges and investors and start-ups can earn, and there’s no place for bounty hunters.

[mekar sari]

I think IEO is good and more reliable than ICO. In IEO there will be fewer scams. But I don’t like that in IEO only exchanges and investors and start-ups can earn, and there’s no place for bounty hunters.

You are too pessimistic without checking before I see that there are more IEO bounties popping up, now you go to thread bounty, and you will find the IEO bounty

[jvdp]

I think IEO is good and more reliable than ICO. In IEO there will be fewer scams. But I don’t like that in IEO only exchanges and investors and start-ups can earn, and there’s no place for bounty hunters.

Like how the ICO's growth is relay on the private investors. This IEO are really need to be listed on big exchanges. If the coin has listed on fake and small exchanges means we will not get the reach or anything for that.
So be closely look at the IEO where it is listed. Even that coin listed on exchanges then it will dropped bigger in few seconds for huge volume of sellings.

[Renampun]

The IEO or included in the Exchange Token category is not too bad for me, there are 10 Exchange that I know that their IEO is a big success and very profitable that are KuCoin, Bibox, Huobi, BridgeCoin, Qash, OKB, Binance, DEW, Idex and Fcoin but we still must to be more careful in making choices, before investing in the IEO we have to first check how the developer works.

[KryptoKai]

Most people are only in it to make a buck and do not care less about the project. This is just giving investors exactly what they want and encourages more people to risk their coins knowing that it will be listed straight away

[TheHas]

I think IEO is good and more reliable than ICO. In IEO there will be fewer scams. But I don’t like that in IEO only exchanges and investors and start-ups can earn, and there’s no place for bounty hunters.

And why is that bad. The only reason for bounties is to help spread the word about a project. If a project already gets advertising through an exchange, then there is potentially no need for bounty.

It should be seen as a positive that IEOs are likely better for investors since they are actually spending money on the project.

[dolores13]

This thread is the answer for your question: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5144119.0