Theymos is a Scammer? Let's talk

[olcaytu2005]

Now I see Moderators delete a lot of post from me. That means Theymos and moderators also are involved.

Why I wrote this?

Because some bitcointalk trusted(!!!) members are attacking us and Theymos do nothing. I am asking all of you,


Most of the scam projects had banner ads on bitcointalk??? YESSSSS

Who published them?  theymos

Why??? Because he needs money as everyone


So, we have managed over 100 projects and a few of them turned into scam. Even they passed KYC procedure on ICObench, Coinschedule etc. So should we accused by scammer? If you say yes, then theymos must be the biggest scammer in bitcointalk. He never do KYC while selling banner spot.


do you support bitcointalk trusted members gang? I'm an old member of this forum and everyone knows my identity. Do you know who is trusted members??? Noone knows, even theymos.


Let's talk then. Who is more scammer? Me or Theymos or Trusted Members?

What do you think if someone acts like a client and steal your secrets?? This is ethical or unethical??



Note: Lauda and her puppets(Especially Suchmoon one of the best dogs) don't allow to post this thread.

[DireWolfM14]

Because some bitcointalk trusted(!!!) members are attacking us and Theymos do nothing. I am asking all of you,

Trust is deregulated and unmoderated.  Deal with those who've left the feedback.

Most of the scam projects had banner ads on bitcointalk??? YESSSSS

Examples, please.

So, we have managed over 100 projects and a few of them turned into scam.

A few?  Lol, once those "few" were exposed as scams, how did you react?  With the community's best interest in mind, or you wallet's?

[olcaytu2005]

Trust is deregulated and unmoderated.  Deal with those who've left the feedback.

Trust is not deregulated and unmoderated?  are you sure??? look at this.

[Steamtyme]

Yes we are sure. What you just posted is providing unregistered or logged out users some idea of how the content creator is seen by the community.

It's a little thing to help people outside the forum not get suckered into a scam.

Your feedback is lacking in a reference at the very least which makes it pretty much useless. Can you point to any specific cases of theymos taking advertising dollars for a scam, and him continuing to promote them once he was aware of this??

I have reviewed a significant amount of theymos's posts and I saw extreme care and diligence in projects he accepted and denied for advertising.

Or do you mean signatures?? This is again something unmoderated by the forum... until it affects the forum.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Can you post examples of scam advertisements that Theymos has posted?

[olcaytu2005]

Yes we are sure. What you just posted is providing unregistered or logged out users some idea of how the content creator is seen by the community.

It's a little thing to help people outside the forum not get suckered into a scam.

Your feedback is lacking in a reference at the very least which makes it pretty much useless. Can you point to any specific cases of theymos taking advertising dollars for a scam, and him continuing to promote them once he was aware of this??

I have reviewed a significant amount of theymos's posts and I saw extreme care and diligence in projects he accepted and denied for advertising.

Or do you mean signatures?? This is again something unmoderated by the forum... until it affects the forum.

Hi Steamtyme I don't need to provide anything and How can I? Banners not like threads. There were a lot of cloud mining banners, gambling banners on bitcointalk a few of them has scammed people. You can search. Do you think Theymos care about it? No.

[suchmoon]

So, we have managed over 100 projects and a few of them turned into scam.

You promoted blatant ponzi scams and shit like that, which didn't "turn into" a scam, it was a scam that you wanted to make money from. I hope it was worth it.

Note: Lauda and her puppets don't allow to post this thread.

Horrible. How were you able to post it then?

Would you like to talk about the title? Are you scared? puppet!!!

Based on your barely coherent OP it looks like you're agreeing that you're a scammer as long as theymos is called a scammer too, and you have posted a negative trust rating for theymos to indicate that. So that question seems to be resolved. If you want others to call theymos a scammer you'll need to provide proof and convince those other users. So far you're not doing too well in that area. Nearly a year after your scams had been exposed you started a rampage of retaliatory trust ratings and other shit-stirring actions. I don't think that's gonna work.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Theymos has the following rule in the advertising auctions:

For the purposes of forum ads, an ICO is any token, altcoin, or other altcoin-like thing which meets any of the following criteria: it is primarily run/backed by a company; it is substantially, fundamentally centralized in either operation or coin distribution; or it is not yet possible for two unprivileged users of the system to send coins directly to each other in a P2P way. The intention here is to allow community efforts to advertise things like Litecoin, but not to allow ICO funding, even when the ICO is disguised in various ways.

Seems to me that he has taken enough precautions to prevent scam projects from advertising here.

[vit05]

Trust is deregulated and unmoderated.  Deal with those who've left the feedback.

Trust is not deregulated and unmoderated?  are you sure??? look at this.

Theymos is a Scammer?

NO

Warning about possible fraud is a correct attitude from admin. It's just a warning that makes clear the positioning of the forum and from theymos. Frauds may not be deleted by mods, then it is essential for each user to check the potential risks of getting involved in a project that has a negative reputation among the USERS.

[The Cryptovator]

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.

Have you seen it below the advertisement? Your feedback's nothing for theymos since its untrusted. Scams isn't moderated by forum, so there is no any point to call him scammer. All scam accusation isn't valid, so admin will not determine which is scam. But I don't think any likely scam or scam website will promote by forum advertisement. That's why forum not allowing ICO advertisement. If you have found any confirmed scam website promotion by forum then open a thread on meta.

[target]

He never ask KYC to advertisers just ask they didn't ask KYC to bitcointalk users, I think that is just. Now if you consider him scam, that will make us all accomplice to this scam but lets not go there. We are all adults.  Whether trust is regulated or not, it doesn't mean we are allowed to find victims of our schemes.

I'll delete Lauda's and her puppets posts. Because they are cowards. They scare about to talk about theymos. They worship the power not the democracy.

None of them wrote about anything about theymos is scammer or not. They just write bla.bla bla.

Does self moderated thread speaks of  democracy to you?

[yahoo62278]

Instead of blaming the administration for your decisions, why not act like an adult and accept the blame and disappear? You decided to promote these projects, not the admins. If theymos lets a project buy a banner ad and it's found out later to be a scam, all banners are removed for that project.

You from what i read, decided to lie about the number of eth/tokens a team is giving away in their bounty. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3913709.msg37585718#msg37585718

You also decided to offer ICO bumping services http://archive.is/IkQXx which is highly frowned upon here.

The blame is 100% on you, not administration or other members. You decided what projects to promote. Whomever paid your fee was accepted IMO. No due diligence done at all.

We as managers cannot know if/when a project will or will not scam. If they are a scam from the get go you should not be promoting them at all. If they turn out to be a scam in the middle of your campaign for them, you should always cease all activity for that company. Make a post with your evidence and warn the community.

I'm going to assume you did none of this but continued to promote any and all companies and now because you were tagged for it, it's the admins fault. Amazing view you have. Hope the tokens you made were all worth it.

Just an FYI, everyone who has a different opinion than yours is NOT a puppet. They have morals unlike you it seems.

[lucky80]

Did you know that admin is the owner? you must be a crazy man. You said that you were an old legendary here.

[olcaytu2005]

You also decided to offer ICO bumping services http://archive.is/IkQXx which is highly frowned upon here.

Is this ethical?? one of the trusted members acting as a client and steal the secrets? Do you think an unethical person should be in trust system?

[yahoo62278]

You also decided to offer ICO bumping services http://archive.is/IkQXx which is highly frowned upon here.

Is this ethical?? one of the trusted members acting as a client and steal the secrets? Do you think an unethical person should be in trust system?

I did not say I agree with the users tactics on getting the information. You're free to ~Lauda in your trust list if you wish as is anyone else. The fact is you did admit to offering the bumping service and as I stated already it is heavily frowned upon by the community.

I'm sure many companies or users here have tried the same tactics on me but have found I do not offer shady services to companies.

[olcaytu2005]

You also decided to offer ICO bumping services http://archive.is/IkQXx which is highly frowned upon here.

Is this ethical?? one of the trusted members acting as a client and steal the secrets? Do you think an unethical person should be in trust system?

I did not say I agree with the users tactics on getting the information. You're free to ~Lauda in your trust list if you wish as is anyone else. The fact is you did admit to offering the bumping service and as I stated already it is heavily frowned upon by the community.

It was just offered we don't provide such service. Action must become reality. Lauda(thief) doesnt have any proof me or my team bumped any thread. We have only 3 accounts. Me needmoney and radnom. But lauda and her puppets have hundreds alt accounts. They may bump the thread easily

[khaled0111]

Trust is not deregulated and unmoderated?  are you sure??? look at this.

Trust is unmoderated and the warning says: "One or more bitcointalk.org users" not Theymos and bitcointalk.org moderators.

Most of the scam projects had banner ads on bitcointalk??? YESSSSS

It comes with a warning that:

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.

But lauda and her puppets have hundreds alt accounts. They may bump the thread easily

Can you provide evidences to prove your claims?

[olcaytu2005]

Most of the scam projects had banner ads on bitcointalk??? YESSSSS

It comes with a warning that:

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.

Ok then I can type " Bounty Program isnot endorsed by the Bounty Manager. It may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. "

Does that protect me???

[olcaytu2005]

hmm no one talks. why are you afraid? you won't be banned. I promise.


Theymos rule is;

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.

He protects himself in this way.

So what if we type;

" Bounty Program is not endorsed by the Bounty Manager. It may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. "

Does it protect bounty managers?


I don't see any difference but Theymos never receive negative trust but we do

[shasan]

Theymos could earn a lot if he wanted to do any illegal activity. Even he could earn many more only if he can open view donation fields for a badge. The community offered but he denied because according to him to operate the forum no more extra fund requires.
And think yourself you had started your self airdrop on tokendrop for 5 eth 5$ for each participant but you have not sent the payment yet. Can you imagine how long ago the airdrop finished? And on your token drop 80%+ projects are unpaid though they have been ended more than 6 months ago.

Hi Steamtyme I don't need to provide anything and How can I?

You can't as probably there is no one and if there is any you don't know you have told scam as you are just blaming for the negative feedback you received.

Ok then I can type " Bounty Program isnot endorsed by the Bounty Manager. It may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. "

Does that protect me???

You are scamming on your site on your self airdrop you have not distributed your self airdropped token. You, your team and your managed sites all are scams. So you cant write

Bounty Program is not endorsed by the Bounty Manager. It may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.

Anyway, if you used this phrase and stopped once you understood then probably you could stay away from the negative trust. But you usually do not do that and also you promote scam knowingly and even you did not send payment which is your own project as I told earlier so how you can avoid negative trust by saying quoted text? Think of yourself twice what you are and what you are talking about theymos.

He never do KYC while selling banner spot.

Why cryptocurrency has been invented? What is the purpose and if you can find out the reason then you would be able to find out the answer of it on yourself.