I am pretty certain that almost everyone who argues with cryptohunter enjoys it, since there is no one who is obligated to do so, it makes sense that they actually do enjoy it, i do too "sometimes" , it's human nature.
my take on cryptohunter is that he does have a few valid points buried underneath the bullshit of conspiracy and gang theory - however, his way of doing things is terrible, he is annoying to say the least, but this also does not justify some member's attack on him to this extent, I am sure things would have worked out if the others were a bit wiser in their discussion with him, i know it's hard because he is so annoying it makes you want to curse him and go offline, but perhaps , someday , we all would start taking things with an open-mind and avoid personal attacks.
I don't know that you have any discussion experience with CH or not but honestly its really hard to talk with an open mind with him. Avoiding personal attacks is always a sign of a gentle behaviour but it is to notify you mate that CH loves to start his discussion with personal attacks. You will not have any chance to attack him from your side rather than being attacked by himself.
I always believe that everyone should have the mentality to reconsider anyones fault if he commited anything by mistak. But what if anyone make this everytime from a premeditated idea.
