Lauda using red trust as a weapon to silence those differ from her politically

[BitcoinSupremo]

Are you people serious or crazy ?  Every connected account is tagged in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0 ( Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List )  and not all alts accounts are on same campaign, yet tagged.  

That should not be the case. Of course having multiple accounts doesn't deserve negative trust. However abuse does.
Do provide an example of accounts being tagged just for belonging to the same person, without any abuse.

Living proof here. I have bought 3 other accounts in 2016 and accepted it, now and even then, never did any abuse, never put two accounts in a signature campaign, yet here I am with Lauda and his army tagging the hell out of me , but I don't care, just wanted to point out that there are people who have accepted to have more than 1 account, and I already abandoned all of them since long time.

[suchmoon]

Living proof here. I have bought 3 other accounts in 2016 and accepted it, now and even then, never did any abuse, never put two accounts in a signature campaign, yet here I am with Lauda and his army tagging the hell out of me , but I don't care, just wanted to point out that there are people who have accepted to have more than 1 account, and I already abandoned all of them since long time.

Your trust ratings seem to disagree with that narrative. One of your reds is for self-vouching for example.

[BitcoinSupremo]

Living proof here. I have bought 3 other accounts in 2016 and accepted it, now and even then, never did any abuse, never put two accounts in a signature campaign, yet here I am with Lauda and his army tagging the hell out of me , but I don't care, just wanted to point out that there are people who have accepted to have more than 1 account, and I already abandoned all of them since long time.

Your trust ratings seem to disagree with that narrative. One of your reds is for self-vouching for example.

It is still in the same time I bought the accounts.I don't do it from ages.Just wanted to show that 90% of DT do wrong here intentionally.Cheers.

[suchmoon]

Living proof here. I have bought 3 other accounts in 2016 and accepted it, now and even then, never did any abuse, never put two accounts in a signature campaign, yet here I am with Lauda and his army tagging the hell out of me , but I don't care, just wanted to point out that there are people who have accepted to have more than 1 account, and I already abandoned all of them since long time.

Your trust ratings seem to disagree with that narrative. One of your reds is for self-vouching for example.

It is still in the same time I bought the accounts.I don't do it from ages.Just wanted to show that 90% of DT do wrong here intentionally.Cheers.

But you're claiming that you "never did any abuse" in response to EcuaMobi asking if anybody has been red-trusted merely for having alts. You've been red-trusted for what can be considered abuse, not just for having alts.

[vlom]

But the case is different with the extreme-leftist cabal led by Lauda. If they notice that someone is on the opposite side of the political divide, then they'll use the silliest reasons to nuke that account.

lauda is everything or nothing. but 100% not on the left wing.