calling out Thule

[TMAN]

Why would you give somebody who is clearly slightly unhinged TMAN’s personal information?

technically he hasn't given any info.. anyway others seem far more concerned about this than I do.

Thule is mentally retarded, I bet if we got his medical records it would show a concerned doctor listing all 7 major kind of retardations. don't worry about it, thule couldn't raise an erection never-mind a legal case against me

[Quickseller]

He PM’ed me a few days ago asking me to confirm if your country of residence was one of two countries you lived in — he said he found someone to sell your dox and was trying to arrange escrow. I asked him what he was going to do with the information and he responded that he planned on filling a lawsuit (presumably for libel) against you. I told him I was away from my computer and would get back to him. I forgot about his request and he messaged me to follow up, I responded that if he gave me what he received I could confirm if it is correct — I haven’t received a response.

I do think he has a case for libel. Although the amount of damages he would potentially get will not make filing such a lawsuit worth his while.

Why would you give somebody who is clearly slightly unhinged TMAN’s personal information?

QS, I used to really, really respect you but it seems you’re always around to be semi helpful to the likes of cryptohunter, Thule etc, why?

In case my post was unclear (I don't think it is), I did not give Thule any personal information, I only offered to confirm if the information he had was accurate with a "yes/no" answer.

The purpose of my post was to lay out the facts as to what happened and allow others to form their own conclusions, however my conclusion is that Thule did not actually receive any personal information, and probably was not actually willing to pay for said information.

The only thing you actually said here was that you dont have the slightest clue how legal proceedings work. In order for TMAN to be guilty of libel, he must have said something that is observably disprovable. He must have said something as a statement of fact that can be proven as untrue. Since he doesn't even know who Thule is, it's impossible to prove or disprove anything about him (even if it's a him). And even if Thules identity was discovered after the fact it wouldn't matter because he made his statements about Thule prior to discovery.

Pretty lame QS, even for you.

I am going to have to disagree with your conclusions on this one. You are free to do as you wish, but I stand by my statement that a defamatory statement against an online identity can be a tort, even if the person's IRL identity is not known.

If you were to go up to a random person on the street and say they are cheating on their spouse, you would be slandering them (assuming this is untrue), even if you do not know who they are. If the person is not a "public figure" ignorance of the truth is not a defense to libel nor is relying on inaccurate information.

It is also possible to libel/slander a business, or an entity that is DBA (doing business as) in a particular trade name.

[Vod]

I am going to have to disagree with your conclusions on this one. You are free to do as you wish, but I stand by my statement that a defamatory statement against an online identity can be a tort, even if the person's IRL identity is not known.

Good.  When I find out your identity, you can pay for calling me a pedo.  Unless you have a police file number, of course.  

Hypocrite.

Added:  Still no action from Thule, QS or OG on their threats...

[Lauda]

Does anyone really believe in these lame defamation lawsuits? Quite pathetic actually.

Added:  Still no action from Thule, QS or OG on their threats...

Thule is all talk, 2nd most annyone after pajeethunter aka cryptohunter.

[TMAN]

guys can we keep the OG/VOD/QS  threeway in another thread?

this one is for Thule the pajeet who got no lawyer

[nutildah]

I am going to have to disagree with your conclusions on this one. You are free to do as you wish, but I stand by my statement that a defamatory statement against an online identity can be a tort, even if the person's IRL identity is not known.

K... Supporting example(s) please?

If you were to go up to a random person on the street and say they are cheating on their spouse, you would be slandering them (assuming this is untrue), even if you do not know who they are. If the person is not a "public figure" ignorance of the truth is not a defense to libel nor is relying on inaccurate information.

Again, not true. Not only do you not know who you are slandering (if the person is truly "random"), but somebody else (a third party) needs to be present in order for it to be considered defamatory. You can't defame somebody if you don't know who they are.

I found this from a legal blog:

Identification of the plaintiff in the defamatory statement is a one of the three elements[1] that a plaintiff must establish to succeed in a claim for defamation.

[1]     The other two elements are that the words are defamatory (in that they would lower the reputation of the plaintiff in the minds of reasonable members of society), and that the words were communicated to at least one other person beside the plaintiff.

This was an interesting article and in the court case mentioned it was shown that the identity of the internet pseudonym had already been previously disclosed several times, meaning chances are the defendants knew the actual name of the person they were libeling.

How much was Thule making in signature campaigns before getting red tagged for what you and he are considering to be "libel"? Like $100 a month, tops? No real lawyer is going to touch this "case."

this one is for Thule the pajeet who got no lawyer

He can probably hire QS for pretty cheap but I don't recommend it.

[TMAN]

How much was Thule making in signature campaigns before getting red tagged for what you and he are considering to be "libel"? Like $100 a month, tops? No real lawyer is going to touch this "case."

Please guys - stop advising Thule against this, I am so excited for some action, like I get a raging erection each time this thread is bumped thinking that the Pajeet has actually done something other than talk for once.

Pajeet Thule - come at me bro!

[Thule]

You guys can post as much shit as you want trying to discourage me.It won't happen anymore.
Suchmoon will get served as first should she not fullfill my offical request in next 7 days.
TMAN will get servered in the UK since he is a UK citizen even he lives in Bulgaria.So no TMAN even you claim your bs i don't need to vitis BG as everything will be handled in the UK.
Martin you are a big mouth and nothing more.You are a scarry little child who can only blast big words but ones i take you words you hide like a pussy.
I sent you again a request to your facebook profil to confirm you are Vod.Why are you pussy hiding now ?
You are lucky that theymos is protecting your IP currently since he requested me when talking to him to get a court decission in the US.
You little boy are so chicken that you are now doing anything so you can't be held liable but spreading false big proposals.
You want me to open a case against you ?I'm still waiting for you to confirm on your facebook profil that you are Vod.

How much was Thule making in signature campaigns before getting red tagged for what you and he are considering to be "libel"? Like $100 a month, tops? No real lawyer is going to touch this "case."

Let's see how my company will be counted in court.What i can say its even on a public blockchain viewable how much assets my company is administrating.Based on that and the loss of income will be counted in court.I got also evidences safed where i told suchmoon and vod that my company is facing losses because of their abusive feedbacks.


But you know what Martin.Since you are a big mouth and a scared chicken unable to deliver your claims i decided should you not provide identity proof which could be used in a court case i will accept your offer and ask a lawcompany to send you an email asking for your details and send you based on these details a legal letter asking if you confirm that you are Vod on bitcointalk.

Let the forum see what a grown up men you are and that you are not going to hide against that lawsuite.


You know why i don't have a problem to open a lawsuite with my company ?Because there is no dirt on me which they could use.Thats the big diffrence.I have no dirt and they can't threaten me with anything.
They can digg as much as they want.They won't find anything.

Have a nice one.

[TMAN]

@thule I’m looking forward to a lawsuite never had one of those before.

Fucktard mouthy pajeet. Just do it you fool, you won’t as you are nothing more than an account trading pajeet.

Laters my little flower, looking forward to the next post with a ticking clock and a load of horse shit from you

[Vod]

Thule and Quickseller are great examples of what I pointed out in my poll.

The more red trust you get, the less you care about truth or consequences.  Those two can't be hurt any further. 

I'm going to have to start a spreadsheet to keep track of lawsuit(e) threats from Thule, QS and OG.  :/

[Thule]

Thule and Quickseller are great examples of what I pointed out in my poll.

The more red trust you get, the less you care about truth or consequences.  Those two can't be hurt any further.  

I'm going to have to start a spreadsheet to keep track of lawsuit(e) threats from Thule, QS and OG.  :/

How often do i need to ask for it till you answer that request ?
Why did you deleted nearly all your content from that profil ?

Didn't you begged to get a lawsuite and that you will deliver all details so i can open that case ?

Where is the issue now to confirm that you are Vod Martin ?

[Vod]

Round and round we go, seven months now.

 

[Thule]

Round and round we go, seven months now.

 

You are just proofing to everyone that you are a big mouth hiding and being scared to provide real proof of your identity which could be used in court.
Martin i hope you at least stick to your word that you will send details to the legal representant when mailing you since you already proofed over 7 months long that you won't at any cirriumstances proof that you are M.L in a way which could be used in court.

You are just a big mouth, a liar and manipulator.Like OG said a weasel who always finds an answer to not provide your claim.

[Vod]

You are just a big mouth, a liar and manipulator.Like OG said a weasel who always finds an answer to not provide your claim.

Sorry.  what is your lawyer's contact info again?

[Hhampuz]

Imagine paying a lawyer to file a bunch of defamation/libel lawsuits over things happening on bitcointalk.

[Thule]

You are just a big mouth, a liar and manipulator.Like OG said a weasel who always finds an answer to not provide your claim.

Sorry.  what is your lawyer's contact info again?

You can chose anyone from Toronto.I will hire one of your choice.

Imagine paying a lawyer to file a bunch of defamation/libel lawsuits over things happening on bitcointalk.

And ?You know how many lawsuite have been already opened because of content on forums ?
If you think this is peanuts than i can tell you you are wrong and courts take it very seriously.

[TMAN]

Imagine paying a lawyer to file a bunch of defamation/libel lawsuits over things happening on bitcointalk.

Visiting an imaginary lawyer - nothin is off limits

[Vod]

Imagine paying a lawyer to file a bunch of defamation/libel lawsuits over things happening on bitcointalk.

Imagine owing close to a million dollars in taxes, and using government money to threaten someone into silence?  

If what he posted was true, wouldn't his legal representative have told him to STFU already?  

Unless it's his mom giving him the legal advice - who knows?

[suchmoon]

Suchmoon will get served as first should she not fullfill my offical request in next 7 days.

Just do it, there is no reason to wait 7 days.

You can chose anyone from Toronto.I will hire one of your choice.

That's... not how lawyers work.

[Foxpup]

You can chose anyone from Toronto.I will hire one of your choice.

You can't choose a lawyer for your opponent. It's a conflict of interest. Besides, I thought you already had a lawyer?