BitAddict (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
 |
March 13, 2014, 02:52:32 PM
Last edit: March 13, 2014, 04:25:09 PM by BitAddict |
|
WTF is this https://blockchain.info/address/1FB1Wry957GoPuasrwP9AZXj63P1won3dSIt won't get confirmed but I'm curious. I never saw that  Edit: Now it shows 0 bitcoins again, probably just a bug. Edit2: I will mail blockchain.info to aware them if they had any kind of bug, so it can't happen again. DONE  Thanks to passerby1969 for the pic! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Joshuar
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:02:20 PM |
|
There are no transactions for that address dude...
No one has 10million bitcoins..
lame trolling.
|
| ❱❱ | | ██
█║█
║║║
║║║
█║█
██ | | | | |
▄██▄
▄██████▄
▄██████████
▄██████████▀ ▄▄
▄██████████▀ ▄████▄
▄██████████▀ ████████▄
██████████▀ ▀████████
▀███████▀ ▄███▄ ▀████▀ ▄█▄
▄███▄ ▀███▀ ▄███████▄ ▀▀ ▄█████▄
▄███████▄ ▄██████████ ▄█████████
█████████ ▄██████████▀ ▄██████████▀
▀█████▀ ▄██████████▀ ▄██████████▀
▀▀▀ ▄██████████▀ ▄██████████▀
██████████▀ ▄██████████▀
▀███████▀ █████████▀
▀███▀ ▄██▄ ▀█████▀
▄██████▄ ▀▀▀
█████████
▀█████▀
▀▀▀ | | e i d o o
██
| |
▄██▄
▄██████▄
▄██████████
▄██████████▀ ▄▄
▄██████████▀ ▄████▄
▄██████████▀ ████████▄
██████████▀ ▀████████
▀███████▀ ▄███▄ ▀████▀ ▄█▄
▄███▄ ▀███▀ ▄███████▄ ▀▀ ▄█████▄
▄███████▄ ▄██████████ ▄█████████
█████████ ▄██████████▀ ▄██████████▀
▀█████▀ ▄██████████▀ ▄██████████▀
▀▀▀ ▄██████████▀ ▄██████████▀
██████████▀ ▄██████████▀
▀███████▀ █████████▀
▀███▀ ▄██▄ ▀█████▀
▄██████▄ ▀▀▀
█████████
▀█████▀
▀▀▀ | | | | | ██
█║█
║║║
║║║
█║█
██ | | ❰❰ | | |
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:03:03 PM |
|
Its just an empty address? Am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
HostXBTC
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Ehms, hola que tal :D
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:04:03 PM |
|
Empty address... Bitaddict, revisate las gafas xD |
|
|
|
|
Buziss
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:16:54 PM |
|
I am confused now, as I see no transaction on that address. |
|
|
|
alexeft
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:17:20 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitAddict (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:20:39 PM |
|
And.... it's gone. Probably was just a bug. There was an unconfirmed 10 billion bitcoin transaction.
Sadly I didn't take pic, I will search if someone did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TTM
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:20:58 PM |
|
nice troll OP  |
|
|
|
|
BitAddict (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:24:41 PM |
|
nice troll OP Not me, blockchain.info is the troll  |
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:24:50 PM |
|
And.... it's gone. Probably was just a bug. There was an unconfirmed 10 billion bitcoin transaction.
Sadly I didn't take pic, I will search if someone did.
I dont remember you being a troll so I believe you, but c'mon! Everyone knows to screencap crazy shit nowadays |
|
|
|
|
BitAddict (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:26:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
softron
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:26:54 PM |
|
An attack?, an unused address should not be seen.
|
|
|
|
|
bennybong
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:29:31 PM |
|
Okay who just sent a dollar to that address.... Come on!
|
|
|
|
|
|
seriouscoin
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:30:43 PM |
|
Shame for a long time member like you made such a noob mistake : relying only on blockchain.info. Next time crosscheck it with blockexplorer will you? |
|
|
|
|
|
TTM
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:32:35 PM |
|
An attack?, an unused address should not be seen.
There is a chance that someone is trying to exploit Bitcoin protocols, it might have a security flaw which is currently unknown by devolopers and community. We should take this issue serious. |
|
|
|
|
BitAddict (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:33:16 PM |
|
Shame for a long time member like you made such a noob mistake : relying only on blockchain.info. Next time crosscheck it with blockexplorer will you? I don't need to confirm anything, it was obviously a blockchain.info bug. You can't send 10 billion bitcoins. I was just posting it for the funny side and to aware blockchain.info if they had any kind of bug. |
|
|
|
|
5flags
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Professional anarchist
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:42:01 PM |
|
Could you not create an invalid raw transaction which attempted to send 10 billion coins? The network would throw it out.
|
|
|
|
BitAddict (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 13, 2014, 03:59:08 PM |
|
They're doing it again. They probably want to spread panic and try to drop the price. Or maybe just a blockchain.info bug, I don't know. Just don't get scary, this transactions are invalid and WON'T CONFIRM. Look.   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
piuk
|
|
March 13, 2014, 04:02:54 PM |
|
Should be fixed now.
|
|
|
|
badon420
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 159
Merit: 100
abaddon
|
|
March 13, 2014, 04:06:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitAddict (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 13, 2014, 04:21:40 PM |
|
Should be fixed now.
Thanks for your fast answer  Here you go (edit: the original one OP referenced):
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
yaffare
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
March 13, 2014, 05:22:52 PM |
|
the transaction is real, but nothing to worry about.
it is only Mark Karpeles cashing out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitCoinsLOL
|
|
March 13, 2014, 05:23:58 PM |
|
Ten Birrion BitCoins Oh my a god! Nice level dude.
|
I never thought my life could be. Anything but catastrophe. But suddenly I begin to see. A "BIT" of good luck for me. Cause I've got a golden ticket!
|
|
|
|
mustyoshi
|
|
March 13, 2014, 05:34:24 PM |
|
If they weren't trying impossibly large transactions, would they be able to succeed?
|
|
|
|
|
BitAddict (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 13, 2014, 05:52:47 PM
Last edit: March 13, 2014, 07:13:43 PM by BitAddict |
|
If they weren't trying impossibly large transactions, would they be able to succeed?
If you don't have the funds is also an invalid transaction. You can only do it with a 51% attack. |
|
|
|
|
|
FeedbackLoop
|
|
March 13, 2014, 06:01:37 PM |
|
Helicopter Ben, Super Mario Draghi or another baby squid trying to "fight unemployment" with trickle down billions and discovering the Bitcoin protocol is a bit different than the USD or EUR.  |
|
|
|
|
Jan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1043
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 13, 2014, 06:03:03 PM |
|
If they weren't trying impossibly large transactions, would they be able to succeed?
If you don't have the funds is also invalid and invalid transaction. You can only do it with a 51% attack. Not even 100% would suffice. No (real) nodes would accept blocks with invalid transactions. |
Mycelium let's you hold your private keys private.
|
|
|
Bigeyeone
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 13, 2014, 06:15:53 PM |
|
Other then a bug on blockchain.info i not yet seen a real explanation for this, if it is not a bug on blockchain.info then bitcoin nodes must have relayed this malicious transaction onto the network, why it was relayed on the network by the nodes but not included in a block beats me.
Maybe the node that sent this transaction was one hop away from the blockchain.info node and their custom node does not follow bitcoin protocol and displayed and relayed this fraudulent transaction when it was supose to ban the node that sent this transaction to it ?
|
PMC: 19dNRVPcjsESqo8isdauc1gQ6PbUrAZor9
|
|
|
|
FeedbackLoop
|
|
March 13, 2014, 06:21:49 PM |
|
Other then a bug on blockchain.info i not yet seen a real explanation for this, if it is not a bug on blockchain.info then bitcoin nodes must have relayed this malicious transaction onto the network, why it was relayed on the network by the nodes but not included in a block beats me.
Maybe it was fed directly to blockchain.info and to no other nodes. Maybe blockchain.info just displayed it momentarily and did not actually relay it either. I would also assume that inclusion in a block has a lot more checks than a relay: no one likes to mine orphan blocks or end on the wrong side of a fork. |
|
|
|
|
|
waldox
|
|
March 13, 2014, 07:31:57 PM |
|
if this 10 Billion BTC transaction was paired with a 51% attack by the same people
could this invalid transaction be made valid and screw up the blockchain ledgers?
|
|
|
|
|
coinft
|
|
March 13, 2014, 08:05:07 PM |
|
if this 10 Billion BTC transaction was paired with a 51% attack by the same people
could this invalid transaction be made valid and screw up the blockchain ledgers?
No, with a 51% attack you can only double spend bitcoins you have legitimately. |
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
March 13, 2014, 08:11:49 PM |
|
if this 10 Billion BTC transaction was paired with a 51% attack by the same people
could this invalid transaction be made valid and screw up the blockchain ledgers?
No, with a 51% attack you can only double spend bitcoins you have legitimately. Correct. You can't produce insane amounts of coins. |
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion) |
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
|
March 13, 2014, 09:50:40 PM |
|
Any miner including such transactions in their own blocks would be starting their own fork. No one else will accept their blocks.
|
Buy & Hold
|
|
|
|
sgravina
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:16:45 PM |
|
That is an invalid transaction. All the miners ignore it. You can make bogus transactions an broadcast them. Bloockchain.info will show them at first and then stop showing them. They will never be included in a block because it has a negative fee. Here is one I saw a while ago created by gmaxwell: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=106434.msg1168214#msg1168214 |
|
|
|
|
bountygiver
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:33:24 PM |
|
That is an invalid transaction. All the miners ignore it. You can make bogus transactions an broadcast them. Bloockchain.info will show them at first and then stop showing them. They will never be included in a block because it has a negative fee. Here is one I saw a while ago created by gmaxwell: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=106434.msg1168214#msg1168214I see, someone try to act smart and use a modded client to do a transaction with negative fees, but they can't outsmart the bitcoin developers that obviously make the transaction invalid. All is safe, no panic required. |
12dXW87Hhz3gUsXDDCB8rjJPsWdQzjwnm6
|
|
|
|
