Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 11:11:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Raspberry Pi cluster vs Graphic Card  (Read 265 times)
mitsos2017 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 09, 2019, 05:35:20 AM
 #1

I would like to know (if possible) if a Raspberry Pi Cluster could compeed a Graphic Card in a vanity address search (as a cheaper alternative).
I'll make an example:
You can buy a 1060 with $250 usd and make a cluster of 5 RPi3 with the same amount.
If the card "finds" a vanity address in 1 hour, would be possible for the cluster to find it earlier?
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714950697
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714950697

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714950697
Reply with quote  #2

1714950697
Report to moderator
1714950697
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714950697

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714950697
Reply with quote  #2

1714950697
Report to moderator
ABCbits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 7464


Crypto Swap Exchange


View Profile
May 09, 2019, 06:43:24 PM
Merited by dbshck (4)
 #2

Performance of a RPi3 very low, it's only as fast as Pentium III or IV (according to few benchmark i've seen as fast), there's no way it could beat GTX 1060.

But as a side note, NVIDIA release NVIDIA Jeston Nano which have powerful GPU (for barebone PC) with price $99, i don't know cluster of Jetson Nano could beat GTX 1060 for vanity address task, but it definitely far faster than RPi3.

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
charlie137
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 220


(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ


View Profile WWW
May 10, 2019, 09:29:50 PM
 #3

did you consider AWS instead?

regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

/__      ___ (  /    
\\--`-'-|`---\\ |      AXErunners
 |' _/   ` __/ / 
 '._  W    ,--'     
    |_:_._/
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4298
Merit: 3214



View Profile
May 12, 2019, 07:00:16 AM
 #4

I haven't been keeping up with hash rates, but I wouldn't be surprised if a GPU is 50 - 100 times faster than a CPU. Given that an RPi is pretty wimpy, my guess is that it would take 100 - 200 Rpis to match a GPU.

Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns.
PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
koch44
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 11


View Profile
May 13, 2019, 08:06:56 AM
 #5

regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

Specifically 472 GFLOPS on FP16 and 236 GFLOPS on FP32[1]. For comparison GTX 1060 performances are 68.36 GFLOPS on FP16 and 4.375 TFLOPS on FP32[2].

Jetson Nano overwhelmingly win on FP16, but only because GTX 1060 focused on gaming which often uses FP32[3]. So clearly even cluster of Jetson Nano can't beat a GTX 1060

Source :
1. https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-nano-ai-computing/
2. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb.c2862
3. https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/8rzsye/why_have_most_engines_settled_on_fp32_for/

Can this Jetson Nano run Ubuntu from a USB stick?

BTC Python developer of various tools. Contact me for programming help (python/cuda)
keychainX
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 374
Merit: 53

Telegram @keychainX


View Profile WWW
May 13, 2019, 11:41:01 AM
 #6

regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

Specifically 472 GFLOPS on FP16 and 236 GFLOPS on FP32[1]. For comparison GTX 1060 performances are 68.36 GFLOPS on FP16 and 4.375 TFLOPS on FP32[2].

Jetson Nano overwhelmingly win on FP16, but only because GTX 1060 focused on gaming which often uses FP32[3]. So clearly even cluster of Jetson Nano can't beat a GTX 1060

Source :
1. https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-nano-ai-computing/
2. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb.c2862
3. https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/8rzsye/why_have_most_engines_settled_on_fp32_for/

Can this Jetson Nano run Ubuntu from a USB stick?

Yes, it runs a special version of Ubuntu

look here, this guy just did it https://www.reddit.com/r/JetsonNano/comments/bi5k8l/i_just_updated_my_os_for_the_jetson_nano_to/

/KX

koch44
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 11


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 11:29:49 AM
 #7

regarding NVIDIA Jetson

Quote
472 GFLOPs of compute performance and consume as little as five watts.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/raspberry-pi-style-jetson-nano-is-a-powerful-low-cost-ai-computer-from-nvidia/

Specifically 472 GFLOPS on FP16 and 236 GFLOPS on FP32[1]. For comparison GTX 1060 performances are 68.36 GFLOPS on FP16 and 4.375 TFLOPS on FP32[2].

Jetson Nano overwhelmingly win on FP16, but only because GTX 1060 focused on gaming which often uses FP32[3]. So clearly even cluster of Jetson Nano can't beat a GTX 1060

Source :
1. https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-nano-ai-computing/
2. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb.c2862
3. https://www.reddit.com/r/gamedev/comments/8rzsye/why_have_most_engines_settled_on_fp32_for/

Can this Jetson Nano run Ubuntu from a USB stick?

Yes, it runs a special version of Ubuntu

look here, this guy just did it https://www.reddit.com/r/JetsonNano/comments/bi5k8l/i_just_updated_my_os_for_the_jetson_nano_to/

/KX


thanks for the info! appreciate it

BTC Python developer of various tools. Contact me for programming help (python/cuda)
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!